To be fair, Zhang Feng failed to win the award, and everyone has his own opinions. Some people say that if Zhang Feng was a European and American scientist, he would definitely be among them, which implies that the Nobel Prize Committee's outstanding contribution to discrimination against Chinese scientists. Some people also say that originality and innovation are the most important considerations of the Nobel Prize Evaluation Committee. Although the methods and processes developed by Zhang Feng are most widely accepted and used by biologists, it is also an expansion and development of the work of the two Nobel Prize winners. He has also obtained important patents and won the patent war.
Zhang Feng appeared on the cover of Times Weekly , demonstrating his recognition of his important scientific and technological contributions.
Thinking of yesterday's physics award, some people argued about the contribution between Professor Zellinger, an Austrian physicist, and Professor Pan Jianwei, a Chinese scientist, because in the introduction of the reasons for the award, the world's first quantum science experimental satellite "Mozi" launched by China was specifically mentioned. The main Chinese person in charge of this project is Professor Pan Jianwei, a disciple of Professor Salinger, and the person in charge of the European acceptance station is Professor Salinger.
This once again illustrates the importance of original research and the original intention of scientific researchers, which is interest and persistence, not for papers, titles, false reputations and awards.
There are still one and a half hours before the announcement of this year's Chemistry Award. Will this year's award be related to the research results of the new coronavirus? Let's wait and see.
