In recent years, with the development of society, China has become overrun with experts and professors. Some experts and professors often talk unscrupulously on various occasions. Their way of thinking about problems and their perspective on problems are different from us ordinary people, so they often put forward some very special suggestions. not only causes great confusion in people's minds, but also brings great trouble to the national economy and people's livelihood, and has a very bad impact on society.
I don’t know since when, these experts and professors have become a derogatory term, and they are jokingly called "bricks" and "beasts" by the masses. These "bricks" and "callers" can be roughly divided into three categories of people. The first category is bad people, the second category is fools, and the third category is good people.
Let me share with you a very real expert. This expert is a great citizen. He is definitely a good expert with a certificate for , and is a good expert worthy of the respect of the people. He is: Guan Qingyou, president and chief economist of the Institute of Financial Research..
Experts suggest: Send money directly to low- and middle-income groups for 3 to 5 consecutive years, and the amount should be large enough
" In order to stimulate consumption, the state should directly send money to low- and middle-income groups. It cannot just be done once, but every month for 3 to 5 years, and the amount of money should be large enough. Plans should be made immediately, a timetable should be given, and consumption should be boosted first. " This is the suggestion of Guan Qingyou, president of the Institute of Financial Research and chief economist. As soon as the advice of Guan Qingyou experts came out, many netizens praised it. Everyone said that this is a good expert for the people, and we should give 100 likes to such an expert. Experts from
Guan Qingyou said: In recent years, due to the impact of the epidemic, many low-income families have fallen into difficulties. Money can be directly distributed to low- and middle-income groups, and we must learn from some successful experiences of the United States and some European countries in responding to the epidemic. Many people say that Chinese people will save their money and not spend it, or that we don’t know how to count, and that there will be corruption and other problems. That is an underestimation of our government’s ability to govern. Do the people have money? In the era of big data, the bottom line is very clear. Absolutely crystal clear. Low-income groups are really poor and they don’t have any extra cash on hand. In order to stimulate consumption, the only way is to directly send money to low- and middle-income families. is the best way.
Guan Youqing is different from other experts. He is a good expert who specifically considers low-income groups. He is a good expert who is actually certified. It is hoped that the country can adopt the opinions and suggestions of Guan Qingyou experts, immediately promulgate relevant policies and implement them immediately, and provide monthly cash payments to low-income groups to stimulate consumption, and this payment must be continued for 3 to 5 years.
Giving out money is not the purpose. The real purpose is to revitalize the economy and stimulate consumption
Directly giving money to low-income groups is not new. In fact, many Western countries have done this, especially in the past few years of the epidemic. Many Western countries have been unable to hand out money directly to low-income groups. Giving out money is not the purpose. The real purpose is to stimulate consumption and drive the economy. Especially in the three years since the epidemic, many micro-enterprises have closed down, especially many low-income groups who are really penniless, resulting in the failure of economic development. Let’s take the United States as an example. The United States has distributed money to low-income families for several rounds. Therefore, the suggestions and opinions put forward by Guan Qingyou are in line with the public sentiment.
Some netizens believe that when middle- and low-income groups have no income, the state will directly give them money, which will develop the habit of getting something for nothing. They hope that experts can provide more opportunities for low-income groups to make money, especially so that more unemployed and low-income people can not only work, but also develop industries, and make more money themselves. Only with this kind of money can we get stability and peace of mind.
Some netizens believe that the low- and middle-income groups are indeed pitiful. They basically have no cultural knowledge. Especially due to the impact of the epidemic, many companies have closed down, making it more difficult for them to make money. The state should directly provide cash or consumer vouchers to the low- and middle-income groups and designate the consumption locations of these cash and consumer vouchers. Only in this way can it drive economic development and stimulate the national economy. Therefore, we strongly support the advice of Guanqingyou experts.
Some netizens also thought: If cash is given directly to low- and middle-income people, then everyone in this group of low- and middle-income groups will have money in their hands, and the money comes very easily, which will cause some people to become lazy. Anyway, they can get money without having to work, so they can just lie down and sleep at home every day. Will it be difficult for many factories to recruit workers? And will it cause inflation?
Then again, it is indeed a good thing to directly send money to people in low- and middle-income groups. Who would agree? When distributing money, we need to clarify who belongs to the low- and middle-income groups? Where does this money come from? If the local government is really wealthy, it should be possible to give some money to low- and middle-income groups appropriately, but the money must be given clearly. If the money that should have been distributed to middle-income groups is transferred to the hands of high-income or powerful people, wouldn't it be contrary to our original intention?
directly distributes money to low- and middle-income groups. Such an expert has a good intention. He is not like other experts who specialize in doing bad things and coming up with bad ideas. What he has in mind is people from low-income groups, and what he is thinking about stimulates consumption and drives the economy.
This expert's advice should be very difficult to implement. But such an expert should be a good expert with a certificate. As a citizen, I want to give this expert 100 likes.
