With the adjustment of anti-epidemic policies, the lockdown has been fully relaxed, which has become a general trend. I have been hiding at home for more than 20 days, and I dare not go anywhere. As I get older, I am afraid of contracting the new crown and causing negative consequences. Occasionally I go out to buy some necessities, and I wear a mask and go back as soon as possible. I just write one article a day and never stop. Unexpectedly, the article I posted yesterday caused controversy?
The thing is like this. When the government was first relaxed, I was an out-and-out opponent. I believed that the new coronavirus was more serious than the common cold and that the government would be more disadvantaged if it was relaxed. This view always runs through the articles I published. However, after more than 20 days of development, the actual situation is much better than I thought. Mild cases account for a large proportion. Taking friends and relatives around me as an example, there are no severe cases.
Fortunately, in the district, county and village where I live, there are relatively few severe cases of the disease, so I listed a few examples and drafted an article, which I posted last night. The perspective is completely different from when I first let go, and I tend to let go completely.
The controversy was caused by comments made by two netizens. I will post the original words below: one just said "Haha!" and the other said: "You represent yourself. You know that many rural clinics now see 60 to 70 people every day, and they are all giving slings."
For this reason, I made a special call to the doctor at the village clinic today to ask about the epidemic situation in our village. She said that there were more patients with mild symptoms and not many people who were given sling bottles, only about 10 a day. Compared with the influenza epidemic at this time in previous years, it is definitely more serious. But we are a large village with about 3,000 people and several hundred households, so the proportion is still small.
Considering that there is a difference between lightly affected areas and severely affected areas, we can’t blame the netizen. There must be severely affected areas with a relatively severe epidemic. The most important thing in writing an article is to be truthful. I am afraid of making mistakes, so I review and review everything I write. I will investigate clearly before writing. If I see any inaccuracies, I will correct them in time.
It’s too late to find the truth. Wherever you dare to make lies, who would have thought that a small article would cause such a big response. This shows how big the psychological shadow the epidemic has caused on people.
Two of my family members had fevers and sore throats. They took medicine at home and did not go to the hospital for intravenous injections. The symptoms were really like a severe cold, especially sore throats and coughs. It took several days before they recovered.
I live in a rural area, far away from the city, so there are relatively few people who are sick or in need of treatment. This is true. The epidemic is so serious and spreads extremely quickly. It is impossible to write random articles and deviate from the rhythm.
However, according to my friend’s experience of the disease, after the fever is gone, there are signs of recurrence. Let me take a chess friend of mine as an example a few days ago. He has been sick for about ten days now and feels better. Yesterday, he went to Zhutai to attend the wedding of his chess friend.
Today in the online chess friends match, he was unable to participate as scheduled. He had already signed up, but because he was not feeling well, he found a substitute to participate. He is the chess player who is a good drinker whom I introduced in my article a few days ago. When he had a fever, his drinking friend suggested that he drink high alcohol to kill the virus. He said he did not want to drink water yet and continued to drink. He was also mentioned in yesterday's article.
