Since the year before last, I have spent less and less time on the Get app, and I have basically stopped listening to it this year. So far, I have listened to 4,653.8 hours on Get, 62 courses of various types, and listened to 2,273 books every day, with the top credits reaching 840 points. But I have basically stopped listening to it in the past two years, and there are a few reasons for it.
1. The content no longer matches your needs. Some of the courses taken by
before "Get" are quite valuable to me. I also spent more than 5,000 bills and to purchase various courses. I must listen to them for purchases, and some even less than twice. As I listen to more and more courses, I also teach more and more books. I don’t know when it will start. I feel like I’m just chewing wax after listening to these contents, and there is not much touching thing. This gradually reduces the number of times you listen to it.
Of course, the most important reason here is that as the content I listen to increases, many of the courses and books I have launched in the future will not have much stimulating effect on me. To put it simply, I feel that I have heard of it and the content is repeated, so there is no meaning of learning. This includes improvements in one's own level and constraints on the scope of knowledge in "Get" itself. After all, the breadth of knowledge supply cannot be compared with "Himalaya" and the depth cannot be compared with reading by oneself. People always like to explore some unknown things. If there is always something that has been seen before, no one has the desire to continue.
2. The level of the interpreter restricts the height of improvement.
Like the listening book in "Get", the level of interpretation depends on the level of the interpreter. The height of the interpreter's cognitive height is the ceiling that the listener can reach. In other words, listening to these second-hand content cannot exceed the level of producing these second-hand content. Of course, if you only want to expand your knowledge, quantitative accumulation does not matter at the level, but when you need to explore the internal logic between things, it is impossible to get you to the level you expect through such learning.
There are two factors in this. Listening to books itself is a passive information input. Many key factors will be lost during the input process. It is also difficult to digest this information in a timely manner through careful thinking. It is probably because the input content during the listening process will not stop inputting because of your thinking, and you will continue after you finish thinking. In fact, the listening process is not suitable for telling too logical content. The content involved is also shallow and difficult to have in-depth descriptions. This is because the auditory input information method will filter out a lot of key content and leave only content that you can accept at the moment. In other words, people will only remember what they can understand, and filter out what they cannot understand, and cannot receive it.
On the other hand, the listening process is difficult to deal with complex knowledge, and some content that requires highly logical thinking. At this time, listening to the reading will cause a downtime and feeling. I once said that the essence of reading is to expand your own decoding ability. Listening to reading itself does not have the ability to explore high-density knowledge and logical knowledge. Because when the decoding ability is limited, the decoding content will inevitably be limited, and you can only decode some content that can be quickly digested. This decoding method of slightly deeper content may fail. This is also the reason why some people can't listen to many courses, because for these people, when their decoding capabilities are limited, their knowledge density will be too high, and they will feel downtime, and they will feel disgusted, so they are unwilling to continue listening.
But if the decoding ability improves, the knowledge density that was originally felt will become more and more familiar, and eventually become as bland as water. At this time, the old model will be difficult to arouse the desire to continue.
3. Transformation from the input side of information to the output side.
Since last year, I have changed a lot from a single information recipient to an information outputer. The original simple learning process was adjusted to a process from learning to output, which made a big difference to my previous thinking pattern.In the past, as a consumer of knowledge, he could receive bombardment of various kinds of knowledge information in disorder, but at present, as an outputer who writes something every day, he needs to consider organizing these disordered knowledge into logical content, which has undergone a huge change from thinking mode to learning purpose. When you think logically, you will find that there are huge loopholes inside it. At this time, you need to rethink yourself. This process of rethinking will actually help you cross cognitive barriers and step into another level.
At this time, when you open "Get" again, you will feel that they are all the same as you, just thinking about it. At this time, what you see will feel, and that's it!
To be honest, I have gained a lot from "Get". To put it simply, from a knowledge perspective, those more than 2,000 books and more than 60 courses are the marks of my growth and the cornerstone in the process of climbing the peak of my knowledge. Of course, it is not just the courses in "Get", but also the knowledge in "Himalaya". Of course, the most important thing is the books I have read to base it. Of course, what is more important is actually the transformation from a knowledge recipient to an outputer, because this indicates that one is breaking up and reorganizing this knowledge and forming one's own ideological system, which is the real sublimation.
