1. On September 30, 2022, lawyer Li Moulei released a work. The content is as follows:
2. The work that the analyst responded to is as follows:
3. The conflict between lawyer Li Moulei and analyst began with the Lao Wang incident, and in which event, why the two were in the position of being sentenced to a lawsuit for private prosecution, Lao Chen is unknown. But everyone has a gossipy heart, so Lao Chen still wants to discuss this topic. And in the current 28 events, analysts can be said to be a "significant" role. The analyst first became a fan of Du and then a fan of Xu. When he was a fan of Du, he gave Xu Fang many ugly nicknames, and after becoming a fan of Xu, he began to scold Du Fang.
4. For such a character, lawyer Li Moulei also emphasized the analyst who paid attention to the "28" incident. It has to be said that lawyer Li Moulei also disagrees with the analyst's character. The two sides have a grudge in the Lao Wang incident, and the trial results have been released, and the time span is at least more than one and a half years. As a lawyer, the process and result of suing such online lawsuits are so difficult. You can think about the difficulty of an ordinary person fighting a lawsuit online.
5. What Lao Chen noticed is the following content:
It can be seen that at that time, lawyer Li Moulei's lawyer delivered an illegal crime notice to a group of netizens led by analysts, and it also stated that in the previous incident, the analyst established a Douyin group specifically for malicious complaints, reports, and insulting lawyer Li Moulei.
This is a few points that Lao Chen repeatedly emphasized
The first point is to advise netizens not to participate in the so-called "blue-selling" behavior and not to make malicious offline reports. Don’t participate in the group sharing of other people’s live broadcast room to “sell the blue”. Participating in this kind of behavior is the navy, because the navy controls public opinion through malicious reporting to achieve its goal. If you think that the anchor's live broadcast behavior seriously violates the platform rules, you can report it reasonably, but you cannot "sell the blue" when you see someone who starts the broadcast. This is the behavior of the navy. Through this malicious reporting, it will affect other people's normal live broadcasts.
The second point is not to be influenced by the anchor, nor should we empathize with the anchor and . Because of empathy, we will think about the problem from the anchor's perspective and thinking, which will affect our objective judgment. Do something beyond the legal red line. As Li Moulei said, the analysts did in the Lao Wang incident, who organized netizens to make malicious complaints and reports, and helped analysts carry out these behaviors, invisibly became the analyst's naval army.
The third point is that when you see obvious violations of laws and regulations, you can of course report them, but the facts must be clearly listed and clear, and the behavior cannot be exaggerated.
Regarding this legal dispute between lawyer Li Moulei and analysts, we netizens cannot convict analysts. Everything is mainly based on court punishment, but Lao Chen also has his own subjective judgment. First, like lawyer Li Moulei, I do not recognize the character of an analyst. Second, the analyst is indeed a cyber-raider who uses hot events to attack and humiliate others and achieves his own goal of making profits from it. He will also become the defendant in the 28 incidents, because he really has no bottom line, and I have also collected a lot of evidence in this regard. Let us look forward to analysts going to court to sue again in the future!
