It is reported that on August 19, the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier strike group returned to the US Naval Base in Yokosuka, Japan. Prior to this, the United States had threatened to send warships to patrol the Taiwan Strait. As a result, "Reagan" moved closer to the Taiwan Strait. This caused strong criticism from China.
But why has the trend changed again?
Some commentators believe that this is the result of my country’s diplomatic victory. it goes without saying!
This cannot help but talk about the issue of Qin Gang, my country’s ambassador to the United States, engaging in a verbal quarrel with the American press corps on August 16.
Some netizens jokingly said: Ambassador Qin alone is as powerful as two aircraft carrier strike groups. This is not an exaggeration. A good diplomat is a reflection of national strength. It is not an exaggeration to be on top of an aircraft carrier strike group.
Once upon a time there was a TV series, about the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party . The leader of the Communist Party of China once praised the "underground workers" lurking behind enemy lines, saying that one person could withstand three divisions.
In other words, no matter what a person is worthy of, it is the embodiment of this person's value.
American " Reuters " reporter Martin provocatively said:
U.S. warships passed through the Taiwan Strait and continued to sell weapons to Taiwan, just like in the past.
While indirectly expressing the US attitude, Martin tested Ambassador Qin and asked whether (China) would take a stronger response?
Ambassador Qin also stated China’s position on the incident of the US ship passing through the Taiwan Strait. China's attitude has always been tough and has never changed. The implication is: Since the United States does not want to change the status quo, China has no choice but to accompany it to the end.
Ambassador Qin said: In the past few years, the United States has violated the commitments of the three joint communiques between China and the United States, especially the "August 17th Communiqué" signed on August 17, 1982, and sold many weapons to Taiwan...
Qin The ambassador seemed to have expected it. He took out the "August 17 Communique" document and read it out, as if he were interrogating the prisoner at a court trial with both witnesses and material evidence.
Ambassador Qin said: The U.S. government declares...the performance and quantity of weapons sold by the United States to Taiwan will not exceed the level supplied in recent years after the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States, and it is prepared to gradually reduce arms sales to Taiwan...
The words in black and white were clear and clear, and the American reporter was immediately speechless. Because the document does have legal effect. And at the press conference, which was broadcast live to the world, it was indeed undeniable.
Forty years have passed. Has the United States solved this problem? No! We have not seen the United States fulfill its commitments...
China has always been opposed to the United States selling weapons to Taiwan.
Why are you opposed?
This is mainly based on the peaceful reunification of both sides of the Taiwan Strait. China's internal affairs and its own affairs do not want to be resolved through force; and providing weapons means provoking a war. Taiwan independence elements will use the above weapons to fight civil war . China does not want similar things to happen.
After a tit-for-tat contest, Ambassador Qin rejected all the stupid questions from the US side one by one. It not only expresses China’s position, but also demonstrates its tough attitude in the face of temptations and provocations. This cannot but arouse reflection among American journalists.
The tough attitude is not only reflected in the normalization of military exercises, but also at the negotiation table. This is the embodiment of my ambassador to the United States, Qin Gang, who represents the dignity of the country and his personal charm.
Prior to this, on August 15, when our Foreign Minister Wang Yi received the Geneva envoy, he made a domineering statement in response to the US's "sausage-cutting" provocation: I will stay with you until the end!
I will stay with you until the end! It represents China’s firm position, belief and determination on the Taiwan Strait issue.
Throughout the press conference, Ambassador Qin Gang perfectly interpreted the theme of "Follow me to the end!" which represents China's position.
Perhaps, the United States has to reconsider its role in the Taiwan Strait dispute and the mistakes of its strategy of "protecting Taiwan and resisting China."
Because Taiwan's "China Times" reported on August 16: This Taiwan Strait crisis will damage the international image of the United States.
Now it seems that the international image of the United States is not just "damaged". It should be completely gone.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-