The highest general in the United States - What is the responsibility of General Mark Millie ?
In addition to defending the United States normally, is probably the only way to study the opponents of the US military, so that the US military can win in the future game.
The US military identified the PLA as their opponent.
, Mark Millie, as the highest active general of the US military, once stated at a meeting that China and Russia currently have the ability to change the current international order.
implied that China and Russia may challenge the US's global hegemony.
His purpose is to make the United States prepare relevantly so as not to be difficult to stop in the future.
Of course, he also has another purpose, which is to explain the "China threat theory" to the outside world again.
To put it bluntly, it is to serve the interests of the United States.
US military expert Matthew analyzed the following points by summarizing Mark Millie's speech.
First, China has clear strategic goals.
He believes that China has the ability and willingness to replace the United States in the future, and at the same time realizes the modernization reform of the People's Liberation Army.
The PLA's current modernization reform is carried out by China according to its own needs.
China is a peace-loving country. How could it replace the United States (make trouble)?
Secondly, China currently lacks relevant talents, but the US military will lack talents in the future.
At present, the main gap between the People's Liberation Army and the US military is not entirely in the field of weapons and equipment, but in the field of talents who can control these weapons and equipment and have practical experience.
However, the US military will not have an advantage in this field in the future.
The US military is now facing an embarrassing problem - "difficulty in recruiting" .
In fact, Americans with high education are not willing to join the army.
To put it bluntly, The treatment of the US military is not very attractive to highly educated Americans.
You should know that Americans attach great importance to their own interests. Do you think they will do things that are of no benefit to themselves?
If this continues, the United States may lack relevant talents.
Nowadays, China does not have the problem of "difficulty in recruiting". Nowadays, a large number of soldiers with high education join the PLA every year, and they will help the PLA realize modern reform as soon as possible.
tries its best to make up for the People's Liberation Army's shortcomings in the field of talent.
In other words, China will not lack relevant talents in the future.
In other words, the US military will be at a disadvantage in the future talent field.
In fact, this is not the case.
US military talents have a strength that the People's Liberation Army rarely has- Practical experience .
The US military has issued relevant regulations, and some senior generals must have certain practical experience.
Third, China's navy has great potential for development.
Currently, China's naval power is not comparable to that of the US Navy. After all, the United States has an absolute numerical advantage in the fields of aircraft carrier battle group , nuclear submarine and Aegis ship .
However, the U.S. Navy is facing huge problems now.
First, there are few military shipyards in China, and the unit price of shipbuilding is expensive.
Second, a large number of ships in service, have a long service life, and frequent accidents.
These are the biggest problems that plague the US Navy.
However, compared with it, the Chinese Navy has not encountered such a problem at all.
First, China has a large number of shipyards, which have fast shipbuilding speed, good quality and low unit price.
Compared with American shipyards, it is almost in the sky and in the underground.
Second, China's related technologies in the field of shipbuilding have achieved huge breakthroughs, and some have caught up with or surpassed the United States.
We use the performance of the electromagnetic resistive system on the Fujian ships to be no worse than similar systems on the US Navy's Ford nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. Moreover, the all-electric propulsion system is one generation ahead of the United States.
Fourth, The resources obtained by the People's Liberation Army will exceed those of the US military.
Although the United States has the highest military spending every year in the world, the United States requires the U.S. military to be competitive on a global scale. The military expenditure distributed evenly in each place will be relatively small.
He believes that China only needs to maintain military strength at the doorstep.
Through comparison, it was found that the US military did not gain an advantage.
Is the truth really as it says?
The fact is not what he said.
Although the military expenditure it spent at the military base of at the entrance of China's country was almost the same as he said, don't forget that the US military is implementing a globalization strategy.
is the same as "breaking the whole into the zero".
Although the US military seems to have spent less military expenditure in a certain area, it is distributed to other places evenly, and can provide quick support from other places at any time when necessary.
Let’s take The 7th Fleet under the US Indo-Pacific Command as an example.
It often maintains aircraft carrier battle groups.
If there is a war requirement in the Western Pacific, the four aircraft carrier battle groups deployed in , the 3rd Fleet on the West Coast of the United States, can quickly support them, and the aircraft carrier battle groups of other fleets can also provide support.
May I ask, is the US military spending less military expenditure in a certain area?
Fifth, The United States' influence is reduced and it will fall from the throne of global dominance.
He believes that through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, it was discovered that the unipolar world originally dominated by the United States was gradually disappearing. And China's continuous rise has also impacted this pattern.
If the United States wants to maintain its original pattern, it has to join forces with its allies to curb it, so as to prevent itself from falling from falling from the throne of global dominance.
and this also reflects the hegemony of the United States, etc.
The sixth, he believes that in Mark Millie's eyes, it will pose a huge threat to the US military, hypersonic weapon .
hypersonic weapon will shine in future wars. With its super penetration ability, it can easily destroy the enemy.
first, The United States does not serve this type of weapon . The AGM-183A hypersonic weapon developed by the United States is still being tested.
However, China has already served Dongfeng-17, which has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers and is difficult to intercept for anti-missile system .
It is said that the longer range and more powerful Dongfeng-27 seems to be stepping up its development.
Second, The United States lacks relevant infrastructure-hypersonic wind tunnels.
China has built a JF-22 hypersonic wind tunnel, which can generate wind speeds up to 30 times the speed of sound.
Use it to test hypersonic weapons, which is the most appropriate!
However, the United States does not have wind tunnel that can reach such a high speed. If they want to test data for hypersonic weapons, they can only conduct actual launch tests. Testing methods like
are not only extremely costly, but also prone to accidents.
We can find from the speech summarized by US military experts Mark Millie that the Americans affirmed the growth of China's military strength and deliberately weakened their own advantages.
The meaning behind it is self-evident, it is to use the "China threat" method to obtain the greatest benefits for them.
In fact, China strengthens its military strength to protect its legitimate interests from any infringement. Instead of damaging the legitimate rights and interests of other countries like the United States.
