June 24, Vice Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Gurulev said on the Russian Channel 1 program that the West’s blockade of Kaliningrad is likely to cause misfire in this area. If we are forced to take Opening up land channels through military operations may trigger NATO Article 5 commitments on collective defense, thus triggering the Third World War.
Gurulev, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation
Gurulev said, "We will destroy the enemy's entire space satellite constellation in the first air operation," "No one will care whether they are Americans or British , we will treat them all as NATO. "
Second, we will destroy the enemy's entire anti-missile defense system everywhere and 100%.
Third, we will definitely not start with Warsaw , Berlin and Paris, but adopt a leapfrog tactic. The first one to be hit will be London, England.
Gurulev was once a senior general of the Russian army and is currently the deputy chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. His statement is by no means groundless, nor is it just a casual talk. It shows that Russia has researched and formulated a detailed nuclear war plan, from the level of nuclear deterrence to the actual operational level of nuclear attack on .
has touched upon nuclear issues many times since February 24, but basically at the level of nuclear deterrence. The situation now is more severe than ever before. Whether a nuclear war will break out is difficult to predict and is full of great uncertainty. In the past, the words used were "unpredictable results may occur", "our strategic nuclear weapons have been put on alert, ready to respond to anything that may happen" and so on. In fact, these words have hidden meanings and give people enough room for imagination, but their purpose is to intimidate and have no substantive operation.
But this time it is not the case. Russia has not only deployed and taken actions, but has also formulated a detailed nuclear strike plan. There are goals, priorities, steps, and deductions. Although it also has the meaning of deterrence, it also has the possibility of dealing with unexpected events and entering the actual combat level at any time.
The reason why Russia has reached this point is also due to the pressing steps of the West and other countries. They besiege and besiege Russia, and continue to stir up trouble around Russia, trying to prevent Russia from taking care of each other and make Russia overwhelmed. However, how can the "stubborn" Russia be willing to let it be manipulated? But if it wants to confront Western countries such as NATO and the European Union on its own, the only way for Russia is to show off its powerful nuclear power and make a "fight of life and death."
The current situation is that Russia has been forced to the point where it has no way out and it is impossible to retreat. It depends on how Western countries led by the United States grasp the scale. If the West makes concessions, does not engage in tit-for-tat confrontation, does not push Russia to a "dead end" and returns to normal, a nuclear war can be avoided. Even if Russia launches military operations again like Ukraine , it will not lead to a nuclear war.
I believe that this time there will be differences in the Western camp on issues involving nuclear war. After all, no one wants a nuclear war to break out. A nuclear war means death and destruction, and it means shared destruction. Whoever angered Russia and forced Russia to use nuclear weapons is equivalent to who triggered a nuclear war. Especially this time, the United Kingdom has been named by Russia and has become the primary target of nuclear strikes. The Johnson government should restrain itself.
