Hu Xijin also worked hard to promote Pfizer new coronavirus drugs. He published two identical manuscripts within an hour, which was groundbreaking in his work. However, his view is a bit far-fetched, and it also reflects extreme double standards. Everything in this world is relative, and there is no completely correct truth. Since there are those who support it, there must be those who are against it. The freedom of speech that we have always advocated, why is it that your discussion about Pfizer is not feasible?
People can freely discuss whether the introduction of Pfizer is correct; they can freely discuss whether Pfizer is effective; they can also discuss whether American pharmaceutical companies have ulterior motives for us. These are the rights given to a citizen by law. How can I ask you to stop just when you say stop? Because now that the country has relaxed epidemic control, I ask you, a "relaxation promoter", to stop discussing issues related to the new coronavirus. Is this acceptable to you? Everyone has a different starting point and standpoint when looking at issues. You can't say that you let yourself speak freely but don't let others speak up. This world doesn't make sense, and you don't have the qualifications and abilities.
