From September 16, 2022 to the present, starting from Tehran, the capital of Iran, it has gradually spread to people's gatherings in nearly 30 provinces in Iran. I believe everyone should know something.

From September 16, 2022 to the present, starting from the Iranian capital Tehran , it has gradually spread to people's gatherings in nearly 30 provinces in Iran. I believe everyone should know something. There is a very interesting point here in

.

, the slogans of the people, have developed to the present, and are not focusing on Iranian Kurdish woman Amini, but using various slogans and slogans to directly criticize the Iranian political system.

and Iran's supreme leader Khamenei, the current Iranian president Ibrahim.

is to demand the establishment of a democratic, free and people with votes.

Then a few days ago, US President Biden , as if he was not interested in the big deal, and chose to support the Iranian people's rally in a high profile.

What is the reason for him to do this? I will say later.

But before talking about this, Damu felt that it was necessary for us to talk about the possible outcome of the Iranian people's rally.

I thought of Türkiye before 1945, and a series of small African countries with political turmoil. The historical changes of these countries are surprisingly similar to those of Iran today.

But what does these slogans that shout democracy and the so-called Western democracy and freedom bring to these countries and the people of these countries? Is

a life that is becoming more and more liberal and democratic? Or is it a better and better living standard? There is no

.

only has false economic prosperity, or repeated political turmoil.

. I won’t talk about small African countries. . Since the end of in World War II, the number of coups in various African countries has accumulated nearly 300 times.

Starting from 2000, as of 2021, more than 20 large-scale coups have occurred worldwide, of which 15 of them occurred in Africa.

Whether successful or not, has the living standards of African people improved?

How many African people have enjoyed the benefits of national resources?

Is there anything else other than bringing pain to these African people?

Let’s talk about Türkiye.

1923, Kemal was determined to throw away the title of Caliph , break the feudal theocratic shackles, and give the new Türkiye a chance to set off again and realize modernization.

promulgated the Civil Law, established a one-party governance system, abolished polygamy, promoted the separation of church and state, and strengthened social welfare construction.

was a good thing for the Turkish people at that time, right?

But by 1945, Türkiye's multi-party reform broke all the beauty.

In 1950, Türkiye's Democratic Party, which was calling for democracy and freedom, defeated the People's Party with a ratio of 87.19%, and became the largest party in Türkiye.

The result is that in 1952, Türkiye joined NATO , and Türkiye's national defense development prospects were ruined.

Let’s talk about people’s livelihood. Under the rule of the Turkish Democratic Party, has Türkiye really realized democracy and freedom?

does not have it, it is still a variety of political shady situations. There are not many problems that promise people before the election that have really solved.

Then in 1995, another prosperous party came that opposed the separation of church and state and advocated highlighting religion and national consciousness, and became the largest party in Türkiye.

It turned out to be another coup. In 1997, the Turkish military's coup was successful and he said that nothing could reverse history.

The Prosperity Party has left, and another Justice and Development Party has come. The name looks quite positive, but it also opposes the separation of church and state, and advocates governing the country strictly in accordance with Islamic doctrine.

Then there is a series of false prosperity, and looking at the bright future, Türkiye's GDP growth rate in 2021 was 11%, ranking first in the G20.

, but what is actually? is actually a serious inflation , and there is also a serious currency depreciation, which makes it worse. The economic growth before

was also entirely based on the severe inflation in Türkiye in 1999, and then at the cost of 's crazy promotion of privatization reform .What is the concept of

privatization reform? Everyone should understand it. To put it bluntly, it means that land annexation , and resources are gradually concentrated in a very small number of large landlords. The average is very high, but the gap between the rich and the poor in society has further widened.

Refer to the rise and fall of various dynasties in ancient my country's history. Among the reasons for the destruction of each dynasty, land annexation accounts for a large proportion.

So, no matter what, privatization is absolutely not possible, this is the foundation of the people's foothold.

Then Turkey is like this now. Behind the false economic prosperity is a serious debt problem. As of 2021, there are even plans for the 450 billion US dollars of foreign debt to deal with Turkey as a national bankruptcy, which is not the case for Türkiye's debt default.

Political, opposing the separation of religion and politics, and religion has a huge impact on people's livelihood. Suddenly, it brought the political situation in Turkey to before the Kemal era in 1923.

This is the result of Türkiye's democratic reform.

Is it democratic? Is

free?

Did religion’s impact on the people disappear?

Apart from the one in your hand, I don’t know whether it works or not, the Turkish people think it is equivalent to freedom. What is left of the Turkish people? Is the land under their feet still Turkey’s own land?

Return to Iran, the Iranian people gathered and made suggestions to the official.

This is not surprising, but after confirming that the contents of the slogans and slogans are really realized, will Iran really achieve democracy and freedom?

This is a bit too naive.

will inevitably have a big conflict before it is implemented, which is something that no one wants to see. Of course, the United States, which deliberately advocates the gathering of Iranian people and even intends to create conflicts, is not included.

is considered assuming that the slogan is implemented.

Next step, where does this so-called democratic and free regime come from?

airborne by the United States?

Is Iran or Iran?

In the end, it is not necessary to be elected by the Iranian people themselves.

The current political situation in Iran is contrary to the Shiite views supported by the Iranian authorities, Sunni .

If that assumption is realized, then the next Iranian ruling party will most likely come from Sunni supporters. The faction's proposition is also more in line with the interests of the United States.

The most critical thing is that Sunni political thought, one of which is that the Caliph, that is, the heir of the Prophet Muhammad in the Islamic system, should be elected by the world.

This is quite in line with the democracy and votes that the people of Iran gather.

But there is another point. In the eyes of Sunnis, the Caliph wants to govern society based on " Quran ". The Caliph will not automatically deprive his posts if he makes mistakes. Even if he is incompetent in governing, tyrannical and tyrannical, and the people should not rebel.

There is also a concept that is not a hard rule, but is also quite interesting. In the eyes of the Sunnis in , it is believed that the caliph should come from the Gulaysh tribe where Muhammad is located.

To put it bluntly, the Sunnis believe that the caliph should be elected by the world, but the Sunnis prefer that the caliph elected by the world are more inclined to come from the Gulaish tribe.

This is the Sunni political view.

is very obviously opposes the separation of church and state , and it is said to be democratic, but it still tends to provide election candidates within the fixed tribe.

plus the latter Caliph’s unruly governance and tyrannical tyrannical do not rebel against this view.

I was a little confused about whether this was democracy or dictatorship.

Look at Shiites again. The differences between Shiites and Sunnis are mainly due to the inheritance disputes of Muhammad in the Islamic system.

Shiites support Mohammed's son-in-law Ali as the orthodox heir.

But these are actually not important, this is an internal controversy. Let's not say much.

But there is a point here, which is the controversy between these two factions. The final result of is nothing more than that you finish singing and I will appear on the stage.

No matter what the result is, the current Iranian people gathering in the current Iranian people will most likely not have any effect on the concern about women's human rights issues.

Unless a third faction appears and it can quickly gain a large amount of public support.

is similar to Türkiye's Kemal after 1923, opening up a new era for Iran to support the separation of church and state.

But at present, can you see the existence of this third faction?

does not have it. Some of them are just chanting slogans of democracy and freedom, but they are actually Sunni supporters.

Then it is obvious that US President Biden's intention to choose to support the Iranian people's rally is.

is not even trying to make Iran realize the so-called Western democracy and freedom.

is simply creating conflicts, hoping to make the Iranian authorities even more confused.

The reason I think so is mainly because even if Iran realizes the so-called Western-style democracy and freedom, for Iran itself, even if this hypothetical political system is established pro-Western, it is still an independent individual.

So in terms of national diplomacy, the first consideration is Iran's own interests, and even to a certain extent forms opposition.

Is this in the interests of the United States?

So only when the conflict intensifies and makes the scene more chaotic is in line with the interests of the United States. You can use the conflict to make profits, or even more serious, rely on this big war money.

However, these are all assumptions of future prospects, and the specificity is unknown.

Based on the information you can see at present, US President Biden chose to support Iranian people's gatherings and create conflicts, which is most in line with the interests of the United States.

is a conflict between Iran and the United States on the nuclear agreement.

Iran really started the development of nuclear energy in 1950.

At this time, the Palavian government of Iran was still an ally with the United States.

But in 1979, the Iranian revolution broke out, the Palevian government stepped down, and then Iran-US relations began to deteriorate.

In 1980, the United States also repeatedly accused Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapon .

was intermittent, but the contradiction has continued to this day.

Just recently, on October 12, 2022, the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization confirmed that a new centrifuge facility was launched in the Natanz nuclear facility .

To put it bluntly, there are new breakthroughs in nuclear energy deployment.

As early as 2017, former US President Trump successively withdrew from the Iran nuclear agreement and blocked Iran's oil exports.

developed to 2021, and the United States and Iran began to restart nuclear agreement negotiations and wanted to rejoin the nuclear agreement, but this negotiations were progressing slowly. As of September 2022, it was simply interrupted.

So from this perspective, US President Biden supports the purpose of Iranian people's gatherings, in fact, is to create conflicts and try every means to destroy Iran's nuclear energy development process.

Otherwise, if Iran's nuclear energy development process is really accelerated, and even meets weaponization standards, the situation in Middle East that the United States has worked hard to create will be completely ruined.

This is what the United States intends.

is under the banner of democracy and freedom, but I can't see any meaning of democracy and freedom in what I do. I only see that the United States interferes in the internal affairs of other people in order to maintain its precarious world hegemony system, exaggerates the nuclear threat , and creates conflicts.

Then now I will ask you a question, if a country wants to interfere in other countries' internal affairs and dares to deliberately provoke trouble and create conflicts within other countries in order to maintain its hegemony.

If you think what you do is the so-called democracy and freedom, then is this world really the world you want to see?

If you still think that this so-called democracy and freedom is the world you want to see.

Does that mean that Türkiye, which is on the verge of national bankruptcy, and small African countries with long-term political turmoil and social order are the so-called democracy and freedom that everyone yearns for?

Some people may say that Western democracy and freedom can also be the same as those of developed Western countries. But by heart, aren’t they eager for the democracy and freedom of these small countries in Africa?

Then why can't these small countries do it?

is very simple, because the current world order is based on a set of Western hegemony . These small African countries are not unable to do it, but once the budding of Western democratic freedom appears, they will be ruthlessly destroyed by this hegemony system.

Even in the current world, the world order of Western hegemony is in danger, but as long as it exists for one day, what small African countries can get is to become the so-called donor of democracy and freedom in the Western world.

They are not unable to choose, but they have no choice.

What's more, including the Western world itself, the Western people's gatherings are shouting democracy and freedom.

, but it was impossible to solve the problem of racial discrimination. Instead, relying on political correctness to quench thirst, can such a system really achieve democracy and freedom?

Or is it that what Western people want is this kind of freedom of speaking. As long as they can speak, nothing else matters?