IAEA, that is, International Atomic Energy Agency . It was a "institution that opposes nuclear proliferation and peacefully uses nuclear energy" prepared in 1954 under the request of the UN General Assembly . It was established and held in 1957 and officially started operation. Now there are 116 members. IAEA is also the most authoritative organization in the international community to use nuclear energy peacefully. Such as Iran's nuclear use, Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge, and Australia's introduction of nuclear submarine are all under its monitoring.
After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict this year, IAEA began to monitor some nuclear power plants in Ukraine and recently issued a resolution. In response, the Russian side refuted that IAEA was unprofessional and had become a political tool . The next day, at the IAEA Council, China called on the Director-General to "fulfil his duties and responsibilities."
Comprehensive reference information, Observer Network reports, after monitoring civil nuclear facilities in Ukraine for a period of time, the IAEA recently issued a "Nuclear Resolution on Russia and Ukraine", which also aroused strong dissatisfaction with Moscow . The Russian delegation to Vienna issued a document refuting the relevant IAEA report. The Russian side pointed out that the IAEA's "Russia-Ukraine-related nuclear resolution" is unprofessional, has "false errors" and "exceed the scope of responsibility of the institution", which fully demonstrates that the IAEA has now become a "political tool" and its investigation work and related resolutions have been "politicized".
On the same day, at the IAEA Council in November, the Chinese representative opposed the IAEA's use of the budget for nuclear proliferation activities such as the cooperation between the US, UK and Australia nuclear submarines, and called on the Director-General of IAEA to "fulfil his duties". Any guarantee supervision arrangement agreement reached with the United States, Britain and Australia will be invalid.
In September last year, the United States, Britain and Australia reached an AUKUS military alliance aimed at curbing China and promised to provide Australia with eight nuclear submarines. This move was strongly opposed by Australia's neighbors and ASEAN countries at that time. New Zealand , which is also an ally of the United States, even made harsh words to Australia.
Australia is a nuclear-free country. The provision of nuclear materials or nuclear weapons to it is a complete "nuclear proliferation" act. IAEA should have firmly opposed it, but Director-General Grossi negotiated with the three countries behind the scenes and attempted to force a "supervision plan" to legalize the nuclear proliferation actions of the United States, Britain and Australia under the "supervision" of IAEA.
Not only did China not agree to this, but other member states also disagree. They unanimously hope that Grossi can handle this matter transparently and truly fulfill the responsibilities of the IAEA. In fact, when it comes to Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant preparing to discharge nuclear wastewater into the ocean, IAEA has not come up with a practical and reliable solution, but is just being a "microphone" in the United States. In the supervision of Iran's nuclear facilities, I also played myself as the "client" of Western countries .
This time, the reason why Russia is dissatisfied with the resolution issued by the IAEA is that on the one hand, IAEA "called for Russia to leave the Zaporo thermonuclear power plant "; on the other hand, IAEA announced that the agency "has not found traces of the dirty bomb in Ukraine." Director-General Grossi said that in the three areas of Ukraine provided by Russia, there was "no undeclared nuclear activity" at all.
Russian side said that IAEA "overwhelmed", which means that IAEA requires Russia to evacuate from the Zaporo thermonuclear power plant. First, the IAEA is not qualified to require the Russian army to evacuate from a certain place; second, Zaporoze has been incorporated into the Russian Federation through a "referendum". IAEA requires the Russian army to evacuate from nuclear power plants, which is equivalent to asking Russia to give up its "territory", which is of course unacceptable to Russia. No wonder Moscow accused IAEA of its resolution "over its own responsibilities", which IAEA regarded itself as the "United Nations".
The Russian side said that IAEA was "unprofessional", which means that IAEA announced that "no traces of dirty bombs were found in Ukraine." You should know that just a while ago, Russia repeatedly stated that the Kiev regime was preparing to launch a "dirty bomb attack" in its territory and "framed" the consequences of this on Russia. In order to prevent the Ukrainian government from succeeding in its conspiracy, Russia also exposed this problem to the United Nations.However, while Western countries expressed their "disbelief", they accused Russia of "the thief shouting to catch the thief" in an attempt to "escalate the situation in Ukraine."
At this time, IAEA actually stated that there were no traces of "dirty bombs" in Ukraine. Isn't that saying that Russia is "lying", and does it confirm the accusations of the United States and Europe against Russia? Therefore, Russia said that the IAEA's investigation was "unprofessional" and the conclusions were "not in line with the facts". Of course, the Russian side also accused the IAEA of becoming a "political tool", which means that the IAEA has no independence at all, and is just an institution controlled by the United States and the West, so its conclusion is naturally "unfair." In fact, this is also reflected in "Japanese wastewater" and "Iranian nuclear supervision". It is not really the Russian side wrongly accusing the IAEA.
