Now, China has once again issued a notice of evacuation, calling on Chinese citizens in Ukraine to transfer and evacuate. There are not many words, but they release unusual signals. To a certain extent, the dangerous moment is really coming, the situation will escalate again, and Russia is likely to do something big.
In fact, in the past few months, the Russian army's offensive has not been very fierce. Some people even think that the action is a bit tender and that this is not the way of fighting in war. However, since Putin changed its generals in the last battle and the current commander of the Aerospace Army General Sergei Sulovikin served as the commander-in-chief of the Russian special military operations, the Russian army has changed its combat style and directly bombarded Kiev to launch a direct strike on the infrastructure. Now China has sent out a signal to evacuate overseas Chinese. It can be foreseeable that the Russian army's offensive will inevitably become more fierce.
However, this is also expected. Although the Russian-Ukraine conflict is bound to be a long-term war, it is important which side that has the advantage. It has to be admitted that Russia did suffer heavy losses some time ago. The "North Stream" natural gas pipeline and the Crimea Bridge were successively bombed. The Ukrainian army also successively won multiple strategic cities. The war has been delayed for a long time, and the morale of the army must have been disintegrated to a certain extent.
So the Russian army needs a big move to stabilize the morale of the army, not to mention that they have already begun to crack down on infrastructure, so there is no need to worry about it. Russia's top priority is to win a battle, reverse the Western public opinion and re-establish the battlefield advantage. Moreover, the West obviously noticed something and unanimously decided to increase assistance to the Ukrainian army and provide more air defense weapons , even the approval speed was much faster.
But does this mean that Europe and the United States will support Ukraine to the end? Macron's statements on were considered to show France's last trump card and were criticized by allies.
In an interview, he said that if Russia uses nuclear weapon to strike against Ukraine, France will not use nuclear weapons to respond. This remark directly breaks the West's always "strategic ambiguity" principle. But this is the case. The attack on Ukraine's mainland will not affect France's core interests, and there is no need to have a direct conflict over this. This is obviously the idea of other Western countries, but it is just for the purpose of deterring Russia and has not made it clear.
. Macron pointed out this point at this critical moment, which was somewhat of a bit of a clear-cut relationship. Perhaps in his opinion, the situation ahead is not optimistic. It also shows that when the situation is really at the point of using nuclear weapons, the first to give up Ukraine is probably these Western countries that have been in a hurry. Of course, some countries may choose to fight back against Ukraine's nuclear weapons and strike the Russian troops on the front line. But after all, Ukraine suffered the worst losses in the end. It is difficult for areas polluted by nuclear radiation and to create value again.
There is no real winner in the face of the war, but the current situation cannot be put on the "brake". It is inevitable that the Russian army will launch a big move, and the future situation will be even more dangerous. Now Western countries are raising fire while leaving a gap for themselves. After all, if you are really afraid that the situation will develop to an uncontrollable stage, it is better to stop rushing, otherwise no one will escape the day when it really gets out of control, especially the American vassals in Europe. (Fish)
