Welcome to watch and view the connection, I am super awesome.
In the past few days, the words nuclear war and the end of the world have been frequently mentioned. The key words are important figures in the world. They are US President Biden , Russian President Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky.
analyzes this problem from a philosophical perspective. A separate and isolated event is likely to be accidental and unexpected events, but the possibility of events occurring increases with the connection between two and three events.
At present, on the battlefield of Russia and Ukraine, Russia is facing a series of strategic setbacks. Ukraine is advancing to the eastern Ukraine region with the support of weapons from the United States and the West. Russia is struggling to the eastern Ukraine. Russia is in short supply and has to issue the first mobilization order after World War II , preparing to recruit 300,000 reserve soldiers to join the battlefield of Russia and Ukraine.
The scale of the Russian-Ukrainian war is a fact, the Russian war is a failure, and the Ukrainian army's combat effectiveness is a fact.
Faced with the Ukrainian army gradually being armed to the teeth by the United States and the West, Russia is really a bit difficult to resist at the moment. Coupled with the continued increase in economic sanctions against by the United States and the West, the protracted war and attrition war are obviously unfavorable to Russia.
Nowadays, Russia is facing major strategic choices. If you want to win and defend honor, you must give Ukraine and thus the greatest strategic shock to the United States and the West.
is undoubtedly the biggest strategic deterrent to use nuclear weapon .
Faced with the pressing of the United States and the West, Putin once made it clear in his national televised speech that the Russian armed forces will use "all weapons and equipment" and "all military forces" to complete their mission.
The general analysis of news and public opinion at that time was that Putin was laying the foundation for the use of nuclear weapons.
Of course, Western public opinion believes that Putin is suspected of bluffing.
wars have always been a war that is always deceitful, real and fake. Sometimes, "virtual" will evolve into "real", and sometimes, "false" will evolve into "real".
In fact, within the Russian army, the sound of using nuclear weapons to strike Ukraine has never stopped.
On September 22, on the eve of the "referendum" in the four places in eastern Ukraine, Putin emphasized that "it will use all means to protect Russia."
The next day, the vice chairman of the Russian Federation Security Council and former President Medvedev "spoke harsh words" and spoke hard on social media, saying that Russia will use any weapon in its nuclear arsenal, including strategic nuclear weapons, "can be used to defend its territory", including Ukrainian territory that is about to "referendum" into Russia.
The first and second-ranked military power Russia has spoken continuously, emphasizing that it will use "nuclear weapons". What kind of signal does this send to the world, especially the United States and the West?
super awesome analysis is nothing more than two points: the first point is of course a warning, warning the United States and the West to stop unlimited military aid to Ukraine and not go too far; the second point shows that Russia is indeed a bit unable to hold on. As the saying goes, "Two fists cannot match four hands, and a good tiger cannot hold on to a pack of wolves."
If Russia is forced to the edge of a cliff, it can only be killed and use nuclear weapons to seek strategic initiative.
If Putin and Medvedev discuss the use of nuclear weapons from a strategic perspective. Then, the Chechen leader of the Russian Federation, Kadyrov, urged Putin to use nuclear weapons, which represents another voice.
Kadrov's voice is in a sense representing the voice of the Russian middle and senior commander.
Kadrov mentioned that the use of low-equivalent nuclear weapons should be considered completely from a practical perspective.
Super Niu believes that although Kadyrov does not have the power to decide on the use of nuclear weapons, the suggestions of the front-line commander are the best evidence for Russia's current situation.
The Russian army is indeed passive on the battlefield and is in a bad situation.
Let’s take a look at the remarks of Ukrainian President Zelensky about the nuclear war.
Zelensky called on NATO to implement a "pre-emptive strike" against Russia. The pre-emptive strike, as the name implies, is to take the lead in carrying out the attack before Russia implements the nuclear strike against .
Zelensky definitely doesn't mind the big deal. It would be better for NATO and Russia to face each other directly as soon as possible, so that Ukraine will be fine.
Of course, NATO will not be led by Zelensky by the nose, and the sheep will not be let go of the sheep.
As Putin, who was fighting between Russia and Ukraine, Zelensky spoke, and Russia's second-ranked man Medvedev also spoke.
After all, it is normal for both sides to make harsh words sometimes, and the onlookers cannot see the wind and rain.
Let’s take a look at what US President Biden said?
Just on September 28, the US ambassador to Moscow issued a security warning: reminding American citizens not to go to Russia, and urging US citizens located in Russia to leave immediately.
Is the United States going to actively escalate the situation? Will the United States and Russia really have a direct conflict?
If the US-Russia war begins, it will certainly indicate the outbreak of World War or even the start of the nuclear war.
On the evening of the 6th local time in the United States, Biden said at a fundraising event for the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee in New York: Due to losses in Ukraine, Russian officials have discussed the possible use of tactical nuclear weapon . The current risk of apocalypse has reached the highest level since the " Cuban missile crisis " in the early 1960s.
Note that the US president, the world superpower, used the adjective and attribution of "apocalypse".
Biden said, "The person I know very well" - Russian President Putin, who is not kidding when talking about the use of "nuclear, biological or chemical weapons."
is decisive in killing Putin. Former German Prime Minister Merkel also reminds Western countries to "take serious" the speech of Russian President Putin. Western countries should not think Putin's speech was bluffing and refute it from the beginning, but should be taken seriously. The same is true for the super awesome personal opinion. Don’t ignore Putin’s speech. As the leader of a powerful military power, it is by no means just a statement.
The fate of mankind is like a big ship that is shaking and shaking in the turbulent sea. What is the fate of it? It is really an unknown.
Welcome to watch this issue of the viewing link, Super Awesome said goodbye to you.
