According to the US media "New York Times", five days ago, US State Department spokesperson Price suddenly announced that Deputy Secretary of State Sherman had met with Chinese Ambassador to the United States Qin Gang the day before. This was the first meeting between the two sid

According to the US media " The New York Times ", five days ago US State Department spokesperson Price suddenly announced that Deputy Secretary of State Sherman had met with the Chinese Ambassador to the United States Qin Gang the day before. This was the first time since Pelosi The two sides met for the first time since the visit; not only that, Price specifically said that the United States is now "continuing to seek open and constructive communication channels to resolve differences with China, and also maintain communication with China." The line is open." This is very different from the tough stance released by the US official and Pentagon not long ago. Many Chinese netizens are very confused about "what is the United States doing?"

Some analysts believe that there are undoubtedly only two possibilities for this move by the US officials. The first is that after provoking China, they immediately want to smooth out the impact and seek to cool down China to avoid further deterioration of Sino-US relations. In short, they have achieved all their goals and have not "suffered". The second possibility is to present a stance of "sincerely seeking to cool down" externally, and at the same time ask China to cancel or reduce its actions in the Taiwan Strait region; if future goals are not achieved, there will be reason to accuse China of "aggressiveness" from the high ground of public opinion. "In short, there will be no change in their set of policies behind the scenes and their basic line of inciting disputes across the Taiwan Strait.

html On the 25th, the "New York Times" disclosed a new piece of news: social media Facebook , Instagram and other social media platforms controlled by American companies have carried out an "account deletion operation", permanently deleting a number of accounts involved in malicious attacks and rumors. Clear. According to the description of the US media, these banned accounts were designed to promote American views, values ​​and goals, while attacking countries such as Russia, China and Iran . And most of the accounts often pretend to be news media or use false identities to write news and conspiracy theories with fictitious facts; the United States also high-profile propaganda said: Twitter and Meta and other companies carried out the first operation to eliminate pro-American influence, indicating that they are pursuing One step closer to the road of "objective facts".

However, including the New York Times and other media that reported this matter, American online platforms are full of articles that attack similar values, spread rumors, smear and exaggerate facts, and draw anti-China conclusions. Many bloggers even use this for their own purposes. Student, all articles and videos are negative attacks on China, Russia and other countries, and they still exist in a very high-profile manner; a person familiar with the matter said that most of the posts and tweets from the accounts that were cleared this time only received " A small amount of likes or retweets, more than 81% of which have less than 1,000 followers.

The conclusion is that everyone knows that the public opinion platforms owned by the United States are to some extent controlled by the government. The high-profile actions of the United States may be to demonstrate its "fair stance" and show an attitude of "fighting counterfeiting" on the Internet, as a sideways confirmation. The news they publish that distorts the facts is actually "real". Another possibility is that most of the rumors fabricated by these accounts are very clumsy. In fact, they cannot be used to smear China, Russia and other countries. IQ account.”