The war in Ukraine is still going on. This war has lasted for several months. Many Western politicians like to use the heat of this war to increase their presence.
Australian Prime Minister Albanese declared in a recent interview with the media that Putin had suffered a "strategic failure" in this war. He also called on China, saying that China should learn from it.
In this regard, Zhao Lijian, spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of my country, said that it is best for relevant politicians not to make irresponsible remarks. Obviously, we are really too lazy to deal with Australia, which has been frequently causing trouble in recent times.
To know whether Putin has a strategic failure, just look at the progress of the Ukrainian war. Just the day before Albanis made this thesis, Russian and Donbas armed forces had completely taken control of the city of Severodonetsk.
Since the outbreak of the war, Russia has occupied more than one-fifth of the territory of Ukraine . The Russian army's offensive is currently unabated and is preparing to launch an attack on the next major Ukrainian city.
Outside public opinion believes that if this trend does not change, Russia may even be able to turn the Dnieper River into the "boundary river" between the two countries.
At the same time, Russia has withstood the economic sanctions imposed by the West. It has made a lot of money from the sharp increase in the prices of oil, natural gas , grain, rare metals and other commodities, and has basically achieved the goal of supporting war with war.
At the same time, Russia also used the natural gas in its hands to form an effective check and balance on EU . It said that Putin suffered a "strategic failure" in the Ukrainian war. I am afraid that Ukrainian President Zelensky would not agree.
Regarding the war situation, Albanese judged that this was his personal freedom, but when he commented on the war, he was deliberately looking for trouble by involving China.
China has no direct relationship with this war. Since the outbreak of the war, China has always maintained a neutral and conciliatory stance, calling for the resolution of disputes through diplomatic and political means.
But even so, China is still wantonly slandered by Western politicians like Albanese. This shows how ridiculous Western political logic is.
Albanese’s demand that China “learn a lesson” is just another platitude.
He just wanted to express two meanings. First, China should not "support" Russia, otherwise it will be isolated and sanctioned by Western countries; second, mainland China should not "take Taiwan away by force."
This is nothing new. It is what Western politicians often say. At the same time, these are also untenable fallacies.
The statement that China is "supportive of Russia" has been circulating in Western countries a few years ago. After the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, it became a hot topic in Western countries. The question is, what does support mean?
Even the United States itself admitted that they have found no strong evidence that China supports Russia.
If buying Russian wheat , oil, natural gas and other commodities during the war is considered to support Russia, then Europe and the United States have also done these things. Can we understand that they are all sending money to Russia?
Albanese and other Western politicians say that China "supports" Russia for one reason: China has not participated in condemning or imposing sanctions on Russia.
But there is still a very long distance between no sanctions and support. We cannot blame China because of the traditional friendly relations between China and Russia.
If having relations with Russia means "supporting", then Albanese himself can speak Chinese. Before taking office, he publicly called on the Australian government to respect China and change its policy towards China many times. Can this also be understood as "supporting" China? ?
In addition, the second meaning of Albanese asking China to "learn lessons" is to compare the Taiwan Strait issue with the Ukraine crisis , implying that if mainland China uses force, it will encounter fierce resistance like Ukraine. At the same time, international Society will also "support the stage."
But anyone with a little basic common sense knows that these two issues are completely different concepts. Ukraine is a sovereign country, and the war in Ukraine is an international conflict.
But the Taiwan Strait issue is entirely our internal issue and has nothing to do with any other country. Those who forcefully compare these two things are typically stupid and bad.
In fact, the reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is the general trend, what the people want, and it is an irreversible historical trend.
Mainland China's strength has been increasing rapidly, and it has enough capabilities to drive out the Western Pacific from the United States, Japan, Australia and other foreign aggressive forces that try to interfere in the Taiwan Strait issue.
Albanese Instead of imagining that China will suffer failure, it is better to take a serious look at its own problems.
China is currently working hard to find alternative channels for Australian iron ore. If China no longer needs Australian iron ore, Australia will really have nothing to eat.
Generally speaking, it is the Western countries themselves that should learn a lesson. This lesson is not to rely on sanctions to defeat a world power.
Since the outbreak of the Ukrainian war, Western countries have launched all-round sanctions against Russia. Even Russian plants, pets, scientists, and artists have become targets of sanctions.
But Russia did not collapse. On the contrary, the EU and the United States themselves were distressed by the inflation of and . China’s economic, military, and anti-risk capabilities are also there.
Western countries have tried their best to defeat Russia. So when facing China, the second largest economy with the most complete industrial system in the world, where do they have the confidence to win in the game with China? It's simply overestimating one's capabilities.
