G7 leaders’ summit has ended, but in the joint statement, the G7 group once again made irresponsible remarks against China. The G7 group pointed out in a formal joint statement that China, as an important pole of global governance, should be highly consistent with Western countries to jointly put pressure on Russia and initiate sanctions on Russia, so as to force Russia to stop its special military activities in Ukraine Take action and make your own contribution to human peace.
First of all, the G7 leaders’ summit issued a joint statement, repeatedly making trouble for China and sowing discord between China and Russia. There are obviously deep-seated reasons.
is the first. This is the practice of "sitting on traffic" at the G7 leaders' summit, and it has now become the norm. From the Trump period to the Biden period and the current G7 leaders’ summit, we can find that China has become one of the everlasting topics in the G7 leaders’ summit. From the Trump period to Biden At the G7 leaders’ summit during this period, all themes always revolved around China. Although the main target of this G7 leaders' summit is Russia, Western countries have exhausted all measures to impose sanctions on Russia. Therefore, at the G7 leaders' summit, sanctions against Russia were actually passed over and the discussion was focused instead. An increasingly powerful China. The G7 leaders’ summit can no longer ignore or avoid the reality of China’s growing strength. Under such circumstances, “taking advantage of China’s traffic” will naturally become the main topic of the “rich club”.
Second, the joint statement issued by the G7 leaders’ summit always forces China to put pressure on Russia. The most direct purpose is to sow discord between China and Russia. Although the G7 leaders' summit clearly saw that it was impossible to bring China into line with the Western world and impose sanctions on Russia, it still urged China to put pressure on Russia at this important venue to achieve two major goals. On the one hand, it creates international public opinion to smear China; on the other hand, regardless of whether China will impose sanctions on Russia, the G7 group hopes to sow the seeds of suspicion between China and Russia. Mix sand and drive nails in between.
Third, the G7 leaders always talk about China at their summits because only by establishing China as its main competitor can the existence value of the G7 group be highlighted and its internal unity demonstrated. The two-day G7 leaders' summit produced many jokes on stage and behind the scenes, and the internal discord and rifts were clearly displayed. British Prime Minister Johnson suggested in an almost vulgar manner that the participating leaders take off their coats for a photo and compare their chest muscles with Putin . Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida was also criticized by Japanese netizens for a photo. French President Macron always maintained a more serious expression in the face of British Prime Minister Johnson's criticism. US President Biden repeatedly stated that he would take action $600 billion to compete with China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
A series of details undoubtedly show that although the G7 group still has an economic aggregate and political influence that cannot be underestimated, times have changed. The great global geopolitical turmoil and the rise of global politics caused by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine made the G7 Group, the "rich club", feel for the first time at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century that it could never regain the glory of its leaders. . Therefore, the joint statement of the G7 leaders' summit focused on China, just to show the outside world that although the G7 group faces many challenges, it remains rock solid internally.
Secondly, the joint statement formed at the G7 leaders’ summit made groundless accusations against China, and China should also respond.
First, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should criticize this. At yesterday's press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, spokesperson Zhao Lijian's attitude was very clear. China has always maintained a clear position on the Ukrainian issue. Its main position is to promote peace and talks rather than add fuel to the fire. China has no selfish motives on the Ukrainian issue. Or geopolitical ambitions. The Ukraine issue has triggered continued geopolitical turmoil and directly harmed peace in the European region. Europe is not only unwilling to promote peace negotiations, but instead follows the United States and adds fuel to the fire. President Zelensky proposed that he hope to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict in November 2022, but the G7 group simply ignored it, which only shows that the G7 group is extremely hypocritical.Therefore, it is enough to refute the joint statement of the G7 group and there is no need to take it seriously.
Secondly, the G7 leaders' summit formed this official statement to make trouble for China, which is nothing more than paving the way for public opinion for the upcoming NATO Madrid summit. This NATO summit is unusual. Leaders from Japan, Australia, South Korea and other countries will also attend the summit. This is the first time that NATO has invited several countries in Asia to participate in the meeting. As allies of the United States, these countries have traveled thousands of miles to Madrid. Their purpose is not to talk about peace, but to form broader ties with NATO. This will counter China and thus establish a strategic posture favorable to the United States around China. It can be said that everyone’s ambition is well known. Under such circumstances, it seems logical for the G7 leaders’ summit to focus on China.
Finally, for China, the focus of diplomacy remains on NATO, and China’s attitude towards NATO has been very clear.
First, as a military confrontation group during the Cold War, NATO's historical mission has been completed at the end of the Cold War .
Second, if the European region wants to achieve permanent peace, it should promote NATO's self-reform and rediscover its historical position. NATO should become a cooperative organization that cooperates extensively and adheres to multilateral security, rather than a military confrontation group.
Third, China has even issued a warning, resolutely opposing NATO's globalization and NATO's disruption of Asia.
Based on the above analysis, since we cannot oppose or stop the G7 group's practice of "siphoning off Chinese traffic", we might as well treat it like a fly. Although it disturbs people's peace, it cannot stop China's actions.
