Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping as the core has attached great importance to the cause of elderly care and cared for the elderly in particular. With the approval of the Party Central Committee, the safe construction coordination group will organize a six-month special campaign to combat and rectify pension fraud nationwide. The scope of the crackdown on this special operation is various crimes that infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly through deceptive means in the name of "oldering care" and infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of providing "oldering care services", investing in "oldering projects", selling "oldering products", claiming "housing housing to elderly care", handling "pension insurance", and carrying out "oldering assistance". In order to effectively promote the special campaign to combat and rectify pension fraud in accordance with the law, the Supreme People's Court of released 6 typical cases of pension fraud crimes, further clarifying the manifestations of six key crimes in key crimes, exposing the "routines" means and their harms of pension fraud, helping the elderly improve their legal awareness and ability to recognize and prevent fraud, and squeeze the "scam space" to the greatest extent. These cases fully reflect the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, demonstrate the attitude and position of the people's courts to severely punish the crime of pension fraud in accordance with the law, and demonstrate the responsibility and responsibility of the people's courts to take practical actions to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly, promote the healthy development of the elderly industry, and maintain the security and stability of the political and social environment.
People's Court focuses on cracking down on
Six types of pension fraud crimes
directory
1. Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong fundraising fraud case
——Illegal fundraising crimes in the name of providing "oldership services"
2. Lu Peng illegally absorbs public deposits case
—Implementing illegal fundraising crimes in the name of investing in "pension projects"
3. Xu Zheng and others fraud case
—Implementing fraud crimes in the name of selling "pension products"
4. Shen Yiping Fundraising fraud , Gu Naixiang illegally Absorbing public deposit case
—Illegal fundraising crime under the name of claiming "house pension"
5. Li Xiaolei fraud case
—Illegal fraud crime under the name of "pension insurance"
6. Li Jiantao fraud case
—Illegal fraud crime under the name of "pension assistance"
case 1
Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong fundraising fraud case
——Illegal fundraising crime under the name of providing "oldership services"
1. Basic case
Defendant Xiao Kaijun, male, Han nationality, was born on November 1, 1981.
The defendant Chen Rong, male, Han nationality, was born on January 6, 1971.
In June 2016, the defendants Xiao Kaijun, Chen Rong and Cai Xin (sentenced) conspired to carry out illegal fundraising in the name of carrying out elderly care services. They successively established Zigong Yishouyuan Elderly Care Service Co., Ltd. and Sichuan Guiran Elderly Care Service Co., Ltd., and set up branches or business outlets in Zigong City , Neijiang City , Panzhihua City and other places. The three of them knew that the company had no financing qualifications and the "oldering base" could not be completed and used, but they arranged for the financing team to use telephone calls, send flyers, promotion meetings, word-of-mouth transmissions, etc. in the name of elderly care services, supplemented by giving gifts and visiting the "oldering base", to publicly raise funds in Zigong City and other places, promised to pay 1%-3% of the fixed income per month, enjoy the priority residence rights and discounts of the elderly care base, and return the principal after the expiration, and signed a "Pre-deposit Consumption Agreement" and "Pre-deposit Consumption Contract" with the fundraising participants, collect pre-deposit consumption funds, and absorbed a total of more than 5.62 million yuan from 189 elderly people. The financing team received a commission of 45%-50% from the fundraising funds. In addition to being used for the company's operations, the rest were shared by Xiao Kaijun, Chen Rong and Cai Xin.
2. Judgment results
This case was first instanced by the Ziliujing District People's Court of Zigong City, Sichuan Province, and the second instance of the Zigong Intermediate People's Court of Sichuan Province.
The court held that the defendants Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong colluded with others to illegally raise funds through fraud for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount was particularly huge. Their actions constituted the crime of fundraising fraud. Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong play a major role in joint crimes. They are the main culprits and should be punished according to all crimes they participate in or organize or command. After being arrested, the two confessed their main criminal facts truthfully and could be given a lighter punishment according to law. Based on this, Xiao Kaijun was sentenced to thirteen years in prison and a fine of RMB 200,000 for the crime of fundraising fraud; Chen Rong was sentenced to twelve years and six months in prison and a fine of RMB 200,000; Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong were ordered to refund the financial losses of the fundraising participants.
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of providing "oldership services". This type of crime is mainly manifested in fraudulent elderly people's money in the name of pre-sale of elderly care beds, fictitious elderly care service projects, etc. through the use of membership cards, promise services significantly exceeding the bed supply capacity, and prepaying elderly care service fees. The defendants Xiao Kaijun and Chen Rong took advantage of the elderly's mentality of seeking pension security, promised high interest returns, enjoying priority bed residence rights, and discounts on moving in, to lure the elderly to large amounts of pre-deposit consumption investment and implement illegal fundraising. The second defendant knew that the "pension base" could not be built and used, so he used 45%-50% of the fundraising funds to pay commissions for the financing team and divided the spoils in proportion. The fundraising funds were not used to invest in the construction of the "pension base", which had obvious illegal possession purposes. The first and second instance courts convicted and punished the two defendants for the crime of fundraising fraud, which is based on the law. The people's court reminds the elderly to choose elderly care service institutions with formal qualifications. If criminals find illegal fundraising by using "oldership services", they should not listen, believe, or participate, and provide clues to relevant departments in a timely manner. At the same time, relevant departments should standardize access to the elderly care service industry, strengthen industry supervision, ensure the healthy development of the elderly care service industry, and create a good environment for the elderly to enjoy a happy old age.
3 Case 2
Lu Peng illegally absorbs public deposit case
——Implement illegal fundraising crime in the name of investing in "pension projects"
1. Basic case
Defendant Lu Peng, male, Han nationality, was born on January 13, 1993.
In April 2016, the defendants Lu Peng and Lu Guangming (handled in another case) registered and established Leping Sunshan Elderly Business Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Sunshan Elderly Company"), and Lu Peng is the legal representative of . From August 2016 to November 2017, Lu Peng borrowed the name of Sunshan Elderly Company without the approval of the relevant departments, and borrowed the name of Sunshan Elderly Company through public publicity and payment of fees by issuing leaflets and holding promotion meetings. He also promised to return principal and interest through high-value welfare consumption cards, currency, etc., and illegally absorbed more than 1.65 million yuan from 51 elderly people. The funds absorbed were used by Lu Peng and Lu Guangming for consumption expenditure, withdrawal or divert them for other purposes. After the incident, the remaining funds in the account of the company involved, the entrusted other companies to custody funds and the discount transfer fee for items in the elderly apartment were refunded to the fundraising participants.
2. Judgment result
This case was first instanced by Leping City People's Court of Jiangxi Province and second instance of Jingdezhen Intermediate People's Court of Jiangxi Province.
The court held that the defendant Lu Peng violated the provisions of the national financial management laws and publicly promoted the public through issuing leaflets and holding promotion meetings. He also promised to repay the principal and interest within a certain period of time, absorb funds from unspecified elderly people in the society, and the amount was huge. His behavior constituted the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits in . Lu Peng truthfully confessed his crime and was willing to accept punishment, so he could be given a lighter punishment. Some of the stolen money was returned after the incident, which can be considered as the sentencing circumstances at the discretion. According to this, Lu Peng was sentenced to four years in prison and a fine of RMB 50,000 for illegally absorbing public deposits in accordance with the law; he continued to recover the illegal gains that Lu Peng had not yet fully refunded, and refunded the fund-raising participants.
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of investing in "pension projects". This type of crime is mainly manifested in the grounds of opening a nursing home, purchasing a nursing home, and investing in a health base, and using regular after-sales rebates and high dividends as bait to lure the elderly into participating in investment. Opening "oldering projects" such as nursing homes and elderly apartments is related to the happy life of the elderly in their later years. The country has introduced policies to support it. However, the supervision of some "oldering projects" is still lagging behind. Criminals use the guise of investing in elderly apartments and investing in health bases to lure the elderly to invest and defraud the elderly of money. The defendant Lu Peng used the guise of promising high welfare consumption cards, currency, etc. to tempt the elderly to invest in the "Pension Apartment" project of the Sun Mountain Elderly Company, and implemented illegal fundraising, which eventually caused the "Pension Money" of 51 elderly people to suffer losses. Some elderly people are often upset because their basic lives cannot be guaranteed, which induces various diseases, greatly destroys physical and mental health, destroying family harmony and social stability. In response to the industry regulatory loopholes and risks found, the People's Court sent judicial recommendations to the local market supervision and management departments, suggesting strengthening the processing of business licenses and supervision of daily business activities of enterprises, and effectively promoting industry source governance. The People's Court reminds the elderly to be cautious in investing in high-rebate projects, communicate and discuss with their children more, and when investing in "pension projects", they should "three views and one boycott": one should see whether the "pension projects" are registered and filed, two should see whether the "pension projects" are real and legal, and three should see whether the income of the "pension projects" complies with market laws; resist the temptation of high profits, refuse illegal fundraising, and hold tightly on the "purse".
Cases 3
Fraud case
——Fraud crime under the name of selling "pension products"
1. Basic case
Defendant Xu Zheng, male, Han nationality, was born on October 21, 1981.
The defendant Zhou Jinpeng, male, Han nationality, was born on May 8, 1988.
(omitted identity of other defendants)
In early 2018, the defendants Xu Zheng and Zhou Jinpeng purchased Fuqianhui Culture Communication Co., Ltd. with others. Xu Zheng and Zhou Jinpeng arranged 14 people including Shen Yanjuan to sell so-called commemorative coins (seals), jade, calligraphy and painting works and other "collections" in the company, distribute flyers for advertising, and give small gifts to attract unspecified people to the company. After the company was falsely promoted, the company was falsely promoted. It is an authorized seller of a state-owned enterprise. It lied that it can enjoy state subsidies when purchasing "collections", and it is a fact that "collections" are limited supply, scarce in the market, high value and short-term appreciation space, and after the "collections" appreciate, it provides a way to help sales and achieve profitability, conceals the actual value of "collections" such as commemorative coins (seals), jade, calligraphy and painting works, and deceives the victims to purchase "collections" such as commemorative coins (seals), jade, calligraphy and painting works, and issues false "national unified collection tickets for collections" to the victims. As of the time of the incident, Xu Zheng and others defrauded 46 victims (most of them are elderly people) of more than 3.79 million yuan.
2. Judgment results
This case was first instanced by the People's Court of New Taipei District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, and the Second instance of the People's Court of Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province.
The court held that the defendants Xu Zheng, Zhou Jinpeng and others defrauded others of their property by fabricating facts and concealing the truth for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount was particularly huge, and their actions constituted the crime of fraud. Xu Zheng and Zhou Jinpeng play a major role in joint crimes. They are the main culprits and should be punished according to all the crimes they participate in. Zhou Jinpeng truthfully confessed his crime and could be given a lighter punishment. Based on this, Xu Zheng was sentenced to twelve years in prison and a fine of RMB 200,000 for fraud in accordance with the law; Zhou Jinpeng was sentenced to ten years and six months in prison and a fine of RMB 150,000.(Other judgments omitted)
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of selling "oldering products". This type of crime is mainly manifested in providing free or low-priced tourism, emotional care, false propaganda and other means, and adopting free distribution of gifts, commodity repurchase, storage and sales, consumption rebates, conference marketing, health lectures, etc. to lure the elderly to purchase inflated health products, food, medicine, medical devices, collectibles or counterfeit and shoddy products. The scale of my country's elderly population is growing and has entered a moderately aging society. Criminals target large-scale elderly groups to commit pension fraud. The defendants Xu Zheng and others lied that the company was an authorized seller of a state-owned enterprise, gaining the trust of the elderly, grasping the characteristics of the weak identification and identification ability of the elderly, advocating that the collections have a large room for appreciation and investment in and rich profits have made the elderly believe that investment in collectibles can provide pension security and eliminate pension worries, and luring the elderly to buy cheap wholesale collections at high prices, and defraud money. The People's Court reminds the elderly to be calm in their investment and consumption, tighten their awareness of prevention, do not believe in telephone, Internet, and TV sales, and identify formal collection and investment channels. In particular, they should be careful of so-called "high rebates" and "high-price rebates" and other publicity, prevent them from falling into the routine of scammers, and protect their "pension money".
case four
Shen Yiping fundraising fraud, Gu Naixiang illegally absorbs public deposit case
——Illegal fundraising crime in the name of claiming "house pension"
1. Basic case
Defendant Shen Yiping, male, Han nationality, born on March 9, 1967.
The defendant Gu Naixiang, male, Han nationality, was born on July 25, 1958.
From January 2015 to November 2017, the defendant Shen Yiping successively established and acquired Shanghai Liyu Financial Services Information Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Liyu Company") and Shanghai Canhong Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Canhong Company"). Under the guise of investing in and operating projects such as German Milashan Milk Powder and Changqingfa Company, and under the bait of promising high interest returns, he raised funds from the public through loans. In the second half of 2016, Shen Yiping launched the "House-based Pension" project, inducing investment customers to mortgage the real estate to a micro-loan company to obtain the mortgage payment, and then transfer the mortgage payment to Canhong Company. In order to obtain the benefits, the defendant Gu Naixiang knew that Shen Yiping absorbed funds from the public through Liyu Company and Canhong Company, and lured and helped elderly customers to mortgage the real estate to the microfinance company to obtain the mortgage, and then lent the mortgage to Shen Yiping. As of the incident, Shen Yiping absorbed a total of more than 298 million yuan of funds, causing more than 168 million yuan of economic losses to the fundraising participants. Gu Naixiang participated in the mortgage of 17 real estate units, helping Shen Yiping absorb 54.5 million yuan of funds, and the total amount was not redeemed was more than 50.06 million yuan. After Gu Naixiang surrendered, his family members refunded more than 29.54 million yuan.
2. Judgment result
The defendant Shen Yiping fundraising fraud case was first tried by the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court. After the verdict was announced, there was no appeal or appeal to within the statutory period, and the original judgment had taken legal effect. The case of the defendant Gu Naixiang's illegal absorption of public deposits was first instanced by the People's Court of Jing'an District, Shanghai, and the Second Intermediate People's Court of Shanghai.
The court held that the defendant Shen Yiping formed a gang with others for the purpose of illegal possession and illegally raised funds through fraud, with a particularly huge amount, and his behavior constituted the crime of fundraising fraud. The defendant Gu Naixiang violated the provisions of the national financial management laws and illegally absorbed public deposits, with a huge amount, and his behavior constituted the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. Gu Naixiang plays a secondary role in joint crimes and is an accomplice and should be given a lighter punishment. Although Gu Naixiang surrendered voluntarily, he failed to truthfully confess his crime and did not constitute surrender. Gu Naixiang's family withdrew more than 29.54 million yuan, and Gu Naixiang can be given a lighter punishment.According to this, Shen Yiping was sentenced to life imprisonment for the crime of fundraising fraud in accordance with the law, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all his personal property; the illegal gains were recovered, and the insufficient part was ordered to continue to refund the compensation. Gu Naixiang was sentenced to three years and four months in prison for illegally absorbing public deposits and fined RMB 50,000; Gu Naixiang was ordered to return the illegal gains and return them to the fundraising participants in proportion to the frozen funds.
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of claiming "house pension in the elderly". This type of crime is mainly manifested in the excuse of similar tactics such as "house book is useless at home", "not delaying self-occupation or renting" to lure the elderly into signing a loan contract or related agreement for real estate mortgage guarantee , and use the funds obtained from the mortgaged house to purchase the so-called financial products they recommend, and illegally occupy the house of the elderly through litigation, arbitration, notarization and other means. "Using housing to support the elderly" has attracted widespread attention from the society as a feasible way to solve the problem of population aging and alleviate the pressure on social and family pension. However, many criminals have created "oldering panic" under the banner of national policies, taking advantage of the elderly's poor financial awareness, maliciously set up traps, and use "housing to support the elderly" to carry out illegal fundraising. The defendants Shen Yiping and Gu Naixiang induce the elderly to mortgage the house to obtain funds, and then purchase the so-called high-yield financial product . In the end, due to the broken capital chain of the financial management company, the house was exercised with the mortgage , and the elderly ended up "both money and houses". Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the people's court convicted and punished Shen Yiping and Gu Naixiang for the crime of fundraising fraud and illegal absorption of public deposits, which fully reflects the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, and the punishment is the crime. The People's Court reminds the elderly to enhance their awareness of financial risk prevention, and do not blindly be tempted by high returns when investing and managing finances. At the same time, children should also care about and take care of the elderly. The country, society, family and individuals should connect to maximize the "scam space" of criminals, so that pension fraud has nowhere to hide, and protect the elderly's happy old age.
Case 5
Li Xiaolei fraud case
——Fraud crime under the name of "pension insurance"
1. Basic case
Defendant Li Xiaolei, male, Han nationality, was born on September 12, 1988.
The defendant Li Xiaolei was originally a temporary staff member of the township social security department and was later fired. In 2018, Li Xiaolei met Wang Fei (handled in another case). Wang Fei learned that Li Xiaolei had worked in the social security department and made a request to help handle urban employees’ pension insurance. Li Xiaolei knew that he was unable to help others apply for employee pension insurance, but he still lied that he could handle it through affiliation in the company. Through Wang Fei's introduction, he defrauded eight victims, including many elderly people, including more than 1.07 million yuan. Except for a very small number of victims who paid flexible employment insurance for victims to gain the trust of the victims, the rest were used for personal squandering. After the incident, Wang Fei refunded some of the victims' financial losses.
2. Judgment result
This case was first instanced by the Qingzhou People's Court of Shandong Province. After the verdict was announced, there was no appeal or appeal within the statutory period, and the original judgment had taken legal effect.
The court held that the defendant Li Xiaolei used fictitious facts and concealed the truth to defraud others of property for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount was particularly huge. His behavior constituted the crime of fraud and should be punished. Li Xiaolei truthfully confesses the main criminal facts and can be given a lighter punishment; if he pleads guilty in court, he can be given a lenient punishment. Some victims' losses have been recovered and may be given a lighter punishment at their discretion. Based on this, Li Xiaolei was sentenced to eleven years in prison and a fine of RMB 100,000 for fraud in accordance with the law; Li Xiaolei was ordered to continue to compensate the victims for their economic losses.
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of "pension insurance". This type of crime is mainly manifested as lying that he knows staff from the Social Security Bureau and other departments or pretends to be staff from banks and insurance institutions. He can handle "early retirement" and "pension insurance" and defrauds the elderly of insurance premiums, material fees, benefits, etc. Basic pension insurance for employees is an important system that conforms to my country's national conditions, ensures the healthy and sustainable development of the social insurance system and realizes "old-age care". Some criminals take advantage of the fact that the elderly do not understand the relevant policies and regulations, and commit fraud crimes against the elderly in the name of having related agencies and illegal handling of "pension insurance". In this case, the victim should have consulted the local human resources and social security department to understand the relevant policies and conditions for handling urban employees' pension insurance, but he believed that "finding relationships" was more smooth and saving money, and handed over the insurance premium to the defendant, which eventually led to the consequences of being cheated and the personal pension insurance cut off. During the trial, the people's court found that relevant departments had weak links in pension insurance policy publicity and business handling, and successively sent judicial recommendations to relevant local departments, and suggested increasing the publicity of social security policy and strengthening and improving the management of social insurance payment agency business. The people's court reminds the elderly to understand the national and local policies and regulations through relevant departments, websites, communities, village committees, etc. when applying for pension and medical insurance, and go to relevant departments to handle the matter in accordance with the procedures and regulations. Do not easily believe that others can handle pension insurance on behalf of others and hand over the expenses to others; those who know that they do not meet the conditions for processing should not attempt to handle the matter in violation of regulations through "finding relationships" and "going back doors". Do not believe lies such as saving money through acquaintances, so as to avoid giving criminals an opportunity.
Case 6
Li Jiantao fraud case
——Fraud crime under the name of "pension assistance"
1. Basic case
Defendant Li Jiantao, male, Han nationality, was born on August 17, 1972.
From the end of February to October 2017, the defendant Li Jiantao relied on Beijing Tiankangtong Jianke and Cerebrovascular Disease Research Institute Co., Ltd., where he served as the legal representative, and formed a relatively fixed criminal organization with Yang Lin, Jia Wenshan, Wang Wei, Zhang Mei, Su Xiurong and others (all handled separately) as the fraud. In Shijingshan District, Beijing, Fengtai District, and other places, he lured the elderly to participate in the "Health Lecture". The activity of "Standard, Free Health Consultation " lied that Jia Wenshan, Zhang Mei, and Su Xiurong were experts in well-known hospitals such as the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army of China, the General Hospital of the Air Force, the Beijing Hospital , and the Peking Union Medical College Hospital . They defrauded the victims of trust and sold the health products "Babang Brand Tianyuan Capsules" and "Babang Brand Ginkgo Dange Capsules" at low prices as special drugs to the victims at high prices by taking on-site medical treatment and prescribing medicines. Yang Lin, Jia Wenshan, Wang Wei and others defrauded 937,400 yuan from 124 victims including Zhai Baocai through the above methods. Li Jiantao's family refunded 400,000 yuan on their behalf.
2. Judgment results
This case was first instanced by the Shijingshan District People's Court of Beijing, and Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing second instance.
The court held that the defendant Li Jiantao colluded with others to defraud multiple victims of property by fabricating facts and concealing the truth, with a particularly huge amount. His behavior constituted the crime of fraud and should be punished in accordance with the law. Li Jiantao, together with more than ten people including Yang Lin, Jia Wenshan, Wang Wei, Zhang Mei, etc., formed a relatively fixed criminal organization to commit crimes, which is a criminal group. Li Jiantao is the primary member of organizing and leading a criminal group and should be punished for all crimes committed by the group. Li Jiantao and others who defraud the elderly of their property shall be punished with a heavier punishment at the discretion of their liability; Li Jiantao voluntarily returns part of the stolen money and may be punished with a lighter punishment at the discretion of their liability.Based on this, Li Jiantao was sentenced to twelve years in prison, deprived of political rights for two years, and fined RMB 120,000; RMB 400,000 seized in the case was returned to each victim in proportion; Li Jiantao was ordered to continue to refund the economic losses of each victim.
3. Typical meaning
This case is a typical criminal case that infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly in the name of "superior care assistance". This type of crime is mainly manifested in gaining the trust of the elderly through the form of voluntary diagnosis and treatment, psychological care, live broadcast of care, charitable donations, volunteer services, and organization of cultural activities, and committing fraud against the elderly. The defendants Li Jiantao and others set up a company to commit crimes, purchased health care products at low prices on the Internet, recruited a large number of salesmen, and used free medical consultations, voluntary diagnosis and treatment to attract the elderly to attend the lecture. They pretended to be famous doctors from the well-known tertiary hospital to "take pulses" and "see medical treatment" for the elderly during the lecture. They disguised themselves as learning the physical condition and condition records of the elderly who were learned in advance through homework and chatting, disguised them as learning through "take pulses". After gaining the trust of the elderly, exaggerating their condition and fictitious health care products as special drugs, and sold them to the elderly at a high price to defraud the elderly of money. The criminal group committed the crime for a long time, concealed means, and great social harm. Some elderly people interrupted the normal drugs they had originally taken because they believed the so-called famous doctor's advice, delayed normal treatment, and caused serious consequences. Li Jiantao is the chief elementary member of the criminal group. The criminal group committed crimes against the elderly. The People's Court punished Li Jiantao severely according to all the crimes committed by the criminal group, which fully reflects the spirit of severely punishing the crime of pension fraud. The people's court reminds the elderly to go to regular hospitals when seeking medical treatment, do not seek medical treatment in a hurry, do not believe in the so-called free lectures and free diagnosis and treatment, and do not buy informal drugs and health products at high prices to avoid being deceived.
Article source: Public account @Supreme People's Court
Cover image source: Visual China
