Recently, a case of collective bribery corruption broke out in Taiwan's legislature, including the resignation of the blue and green camp, the current civil representative and their related persons, a total of ten defendants were involved, and were requested by the Taiwan prosecutor to detain the court for corruption. After five days and four nights of search, the Taipei District Court held a record 53-hour detention review court, and this afternoon, a ruling was made on eight people. Among them, the Democratic Progressive Party’s civil representative Su Zhenqing, the Kuomintang’s civil representative Liao Guodong and Chen Chaoming were detained and banned from meeting. The non-party civil representative Zhao Zhengyu paid 1 million yuan ( New Taiwan dollars , the same below) to restrict residence and leave and go abroad. The former Confucian representative Xu Yongming paid 800,000 yuan, and contact with relevant witnesses in this case are prohibited. Another former civilian, Chen Tangshan, was recently ordered by the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office to pay 500,000 yuan in bail.
8 people involved in the case detained all denied the crime in the Voice Detention Review Court. Su Zhenqing argued that it was a loan relationship, Chen Chaoming and others claimed that it was a political donation or donation, and Chen Chaoming also claimed that the money had been declared to the Taiwan supervisory agency in accordance with the law. However, the Taiwan prosecutor believes that the NT$1 million to NT$2 million will be charged when the private representatives attend the public meeting, which is beyond the normal etiquette market, and even receiving political donations during non-election periods is not in compliance with the laws and regulations.
Taiwan public opinion suspects that this may be just that the people's generation cannot represent public opinion normally and has become the tip of the iceberg of the scene of political parties and consortiums!
Just recently, Tsai Ing-wen declared as the party chairman at the Democratic Progressive Party Congress that "not let corrupt scripts come true", and also supported his confidant, Su Jiaquan, Secretary-General of the Tsai Office, saying that the accusation should be made evidence.
Tsai Ing-wen must have thought that the plot changed so quickly, and the Su family's economic plan for the career and economic plan has always followed his own script. This time, the Green Camp private representative Su Zhenqing was suspected of being involved in the bribery case, which severely damaged the image of the DPP. Su Jiaquan, Su Zhenqing's uncle and nephew and his family were exposed in succession of Tang Rong, Indonesian case, Tailiu case and Xiangyin Wax case. Less than 24 hours after Su Jiaquan resigned, Tsai Ing-wen quickly decided that former chairman of the Straits Foundation, Li Dawei, , and urged to replace Su Jiaquan as Secretary-General of the Tsai Office, and held a press conference to speak out about the case of bribery by the civilians.
Although Tsai Ing-wen's words were both harsh, the result was likely to become a joke in the market just like "the script came true". Taiwanese media pointed out that in the fact that the people's generation cannot represent public opinion normally and truly, Tsai Ing-wen is the culprit:
In 2014, Tsai Ing-wen, who has not yet been elected as the leader of Taiwan, pointed out in the name of the chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party that the most important thing about "constitutionalism" is to solve the current problem of the disconnection between Taiwan's legislative body and public opinion. When talking nonsense, they are all wise people. But after she came to power, she let the problem continue to worsen, so that over the past four years, Taiwan’s legislature first became her voice-over, and it was also the “Legislative Bureau” of the Taiwan executive body, and it was a place where the consortium bought the civilians and corrupted their “rules” and functions. In the more than four years since Tsai Ing-wen came to power, there have been repeated evil actions of Taiwan's legislative bodies not "legal" meetings in accordance with the constitution and violating the preparatory and final accounts system. For example, the total budget of the Taiwan authorities in 2020 should have been completed before the end of November 2019 according to regulations to facilitate the implementation of New Year's Day in 2020. However, Tsai Ing-wen insisted that the Taiwan legislature would be allowed to suspend meetings from December 18 to 30, 2019, so that the 2020 total budget was forced to "take tricks" by the new democratic representative after the "full rule" of the Democratic Progressive Party after "fully taking advantage of the temporary meeting, and passed the total budget of 2 trillion yuan (NTD) of more than NT$, setting a "unconstitutional" case for the review of the budget for the change of term of the Taiwan legislature! In the recent exercise of the "Supervision Commission"'s right to agree, there was also a procedure that violated the "voting should be voted after being reviewed by all the civil representatives" in the exercise of the powers of the Taiwan legislative body, and forced to pass the head of the Taiwan supervisory body and the candidates of the "Supervision Commission" that most public opinion did not agree with!
Lin Tengyao, a retired professor of law at Tohoku University in Taiwan, pointed out that on July 13, he was invited to attend the Taiwan legislative body's "Supervisory Committee" meeting to exercise the consent of the "Supervisory Committee" and the eight "Review Committee members" were listed, with only one participating in the whole process. There were no three people in the seats in the audience.
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
""""
"" 1.)"" 1.)"" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" 1.)" Now, if the DPP’s bribery case is still avoided and unwilling to publicly express the Taiwanese people’s apology for not reforming Taiwan’s legislative body in more than four years.
