According to Taiwan media reports, the controversy over the "paper gate" of Taoyuan mayor candidate Lin Zhijian, launched by the Democratic Progressive Party, broke out. The storm has not yet subsided, and the problem of Hsinchu baseball stadium has also caused, igniting the war in Taiwan's political arena. At present, Lin Zhijian is already a super time bomb of the Green Camp. Although the DPP still has no idea of replacing people, the election departments of the Taiwan authorities will not accept candidate registration until the end of next month. Before this, the DPP can still regret it at any time.
Judging from the situation where Lin Zhijian is now at the center of two major storms, most politicians in the green camp are afraid to avoid it, but under the leadership of Tsai Ing-wen, the whole party still has to show a supportive attitude. The DPP not only "determines" that Lin Zhijian's paper is fine, but even begins to turn the tables, insisting that the review of papers by the National Taiwan University Academy of Social Sciences is unfair. This allegation is equivalent to being judged before trial, and it hurts not only the reputation of Taiwan University, the highest institution in Taiwan, but also stands in opposition to public opinion.
In the latest poll on the island, nearly 60% of the willingness to replace illegal candidates is believed to be necessary, and 85% of netizens think that Lin Zhijian's two major storms will have a significant impact on the Taoyuan election. On the issue of "changing toughness", less than 40% of the results believe that the DPP does not need to let Lin Zhijian withdraw from the election, and Lin Zhijian's approval rating also dropped to 16%. There is no longer any taillights of the two opponents, Zhang Shanzheng and Lai Xiangling.
At the same time, Lin Zhijian spent 1.2 billion NT$html during his tenure as mayor of Hsinchu to renovate a low-quality Hsinchu baseball stadium. It had to close in two days after the start of the game and rebuild it. The anger that triggered fans also hit Shen Huihong, the DPP’s Hsinchu mayor candidate, and his poll also ranked last among the candidates, with only 13.6%.
Another key party to Lin Zhijian's "paper gate" incident, Yu Zhenghuang, also recently came out to issue a statement, emphasizing that his paper was completed in accordance with academic standards and there was no plagiarism. This not only slapped Lin Zhijian in the face, but also slapped Chen Mingtong, the instructor who stood up for Lin Zhijian and the current head of the Taiwan security department. The DPP attempted to guide the papers was written by Lin Zhijian first and Yu Zhenghuang first published them.
There are blockbuster similarities in the papers of Yu Zhenghuang and Lin Zhijian. It is not only the word selection is completely consistent, but even the typos are exactly the same. It is not plagiarism. After the "paper gate" was exposed, Lin Zhijian leaned against the DPP's media voice, using various charts and rhetorics to express or imply that he was the original, trying to splash the dirty water of plagiarism at Yu Zhenghuang.
At that time, will Lin Zhijian dare to come forward at the National Taiwan University paper review meeting? Because as soon as Yu Zhenghuang came forward, Lin Zhijian fell down as soon as he asked. What else can I say? Therefore, the DPP can only stick to the excuse of "the review meeting is unfair" and refuses to attend, and may also convene various personnel to discredit the review meeting. Once Lin Zhijian is identified as plagiarism, the DPP will most likely turn out to divert the focus of various political languages.
However, the DPP has put the whole party in its efforts to safeguard an academic corruption, irresponsible, and even useless measures to hold a candidate. Such a moral standard is too insulting the vision and wisdom of Taoyuan citizens. Even Lai Xiangling, the opponent of Lin Zhijian and the candidate for the Taoyuan mayor of the Taiwan People's Party, advised the DPP to save the "right person" even if it was saved, and should defend its true value.
Yu Zhenghuang suddenly issued a statement that obviously disrupted the DPP's plan to bite the ball. Former Democratic Progressive Party Guo Zhengliang suggested to the DPP that he should make a decision on whether to "change the toughest", because the current situation is already surrounded by enemies. If this continues, the DPP election will be "really done". Although the various actions of the Green Camp can consolidate the basic market to a certain extent, they are very unfavorable to winning middle-class voters. Once middle-aged voters develop disgust with the DPP, it is likely that the green camp will suffer from the election situation in other counties and cities at the end of the year and will be defeated. As for whether we should “change the tough one”? No matter how you look at it, Lin Zhijian is already dead!
