Chen Yuqi, a PhD in Public Administration and Policy, Taipei University, wrote an article in Taiwan media today, pointing out that "anti-China and Taiwan" has always been the DPP's election slogan. As the confrontation between cross-strait relations reaches extremes, the "resisting China and the fall of the state" may cause the price of "resisting China and China to fall" to rise one after another. Without sufficient policy support, no wonder the people seriously questioned the DPP's cross-strait policy direction. From the urgent impact of the wave of bankruptcy of private schools and the generational injustice of military service policies, the people have seen clearly that when the cross-strait is in "confrontation", the DPP authorities are simply unable to "protect Taiwan"!
Picture source Taiwan media
DPP has the ability to shout "anti-China and protect Taiwan", so it must be able to be responsible for whoever has to bear the bitter fruit of "anti-China" brought about by "anti-China". With the impact of the bankruptcy of private schools due to the impact of the reduction of births, I wonder how the DPP authorities can solve the real problem of insufficient student sources? If the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are under a peaceful structure, and mainland graduates have reached a scale of tens of millions, Taiwan's private schools will definitely be able to survive by attracting these 1% of mainland students, and they will not have to face the crisis of bankruptcy and withdrawal. Now the DPP authorities want private schools to be self-reliant and self-reliant. How can they recruit mainland students to Taiwan under the opposition of cross-strait deadlock? How to face 50 schools in 6 years and may disappear?
will never be the old tune again, shouting for irresponsible "new southward" admissions? Have you forgotten that the growth rate of students in the "New Southward" has slowed down, and the total number of students has decreased instead of increasing last year. The "Ministry of Education" of the Taiwan authorities once encouraged technical colleges and universities to set up "New Southbound International Special Class for Industry-Academic Cooperation" so far, the number of people has continued to hit a low point. In addition, the chaos in the "New Southward" industry-university specialty classes have occurred, and internships in Taiwan have been broken from the content they have learned. The cheap sweats and education worker and human trafficking are at the front line, making the "New Southward" enrollment completely "unfailed toward the heart".
In addition, the United States is trying to build Taiwan into a huge arsenal of weapons. The fierce battle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait triggered the insufficient number of troops to resume conscription, which also caused the unfair military service policy of the DPP authorities to emerge, causing fundamental contradictions in the injustice of generations of military service. People asked whether it was just for 4 months that soldiers did not need to go back to make up for the extended part of the future service period? The bitter fruit of "anti-China and Taiwan" comes from generation to generation to generation. Who believes that "anti-China" can really "protect Taiwan"? Young people who are unwilling to join the army only want to be officials, or just serve as substitute soldiers and four months of soldiers, have completely made the "anti-China" able to "protect Taiwan" and make the jokes all day long.
The DPP authorities' "anti-China and Taiwan" are now challenged by public opinion. Under the pressure of election, we can see the clear statements of the people on the extension of military service, but it reveals that in order to please young votes, the DPP authorities seem to have more politics than military professional considerations, and are constantly shirking the responsibility and transferring the bitter fruits of "anti-China and Taiwan" to the next generation.
Facts have proved that only "harmony with the mainland" can protect Taiwan. According to the current irresponsible provocation of the DPP authorities in "anti-China" and will definitely "fall". He always talks about the peace dividends of the "cross-strait peace" framework during Ma Ying-jeou's tenure. Since Tsai Ing-wen chose to "anti-China and protect Taiwan", he must clearly inform the people that they should face all the costs and bitter fruits of "protecting Taiwan". Otherwise, if the future term ends, can we shirk responsibility and leave? Don’t you need to give clear explanations to the public?
