In the past two days, Russia has continuously issued nuclear threats to the West. I see some people saying that " nuclear weapon must not be used", especially through the spread of some big names, it is very popular. This topic is very interesting. First of all, I must make it clear that I only talk about this matter, and there is no support for whom I oppose.
nuclear weapons have been used on the battlefield. This is an indisputable fact, that is, they are used on Japan, one of the culprits in World War II , so it is definitely inaccurate to say that "nuclear weapons must not be used". Some might say that using nuclear weapons to deal with fascism is just an exception and has never been used since then.
OK, nuclear weapons have indeed not been used since then, but if they really "absolutely cannot be used", then why did the United States and the Soviet Union, and later Russia, have to research and produce so many low-equivalent tactical nuclear weapons, , and new low-pollution nuclear weapons. In theory, nuclear weapons of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, or even tens of millions of tons are enough.
After all, these countries develop low-equivalent and low-pollution nuclear weapons to solve the moral problem of using nuclear weapons and prepare to put them into the battlefield.
says, "nuclear weapons must not be used." It is just a ecstasy that the United States has instilled into the world after the Cold War after the United States' national strength reached an unmatched level. Before this, the two empires of the United States and the Soviet Union had used nuclear weapons to threaten their opponents and the people of third world countries, and China had suffered a lot. Resist U.S. aggression and aid Korea , China and the Soviet Union turn against each other, they are repeatedly threatening us.
says that "nuclear weapons must not be used" are mostly countries that have no say in this field. During the Cold War, Europe was at the center of , the United States and the Soviet Union fought for , and they were afraid of both sides' use of nuclear weapons. Of course, they had to make this point loudly, while the United States and the Soviet Union never avoided their firm determination and will to use nuclear weapons.
In addition, imperialism, hegemony uses nuclear threats to achieve the effect of using nuclear weapons. This is the main reason why they do not use nuclear weapons, not because they really think that "nuclear weapons must not be used." Think about it, if they think that the nuclear threat cannot achieve the purpose of safeguarding and realizing their core interests, will they use nuclear weapons?
Russia's threat to use nuclear weapons is not the threat of the world to nuclear war . The strategic imbalance of major powers is the threat of the world to nuclear war. It is precisely because after the Cold War, American imperialism and its accomplices continued to unscrupulously strategically squeeze other countries, especially global such as China and Russia, that the possibility of nuclear weapons being used is becoming increasingly greater.
We should admit this. The creation of nuclear weapons, especially small-equivalent and low-pollution nuclear weapons, is developed, is for use, not really just for viewing. It’s just that the threshold for use is higher and the conditions are more complicated. But no matter how high the threshold is, it is also a weapon, a weapon to realize national interests and safeguard national security.
Return to the current situation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Due to the in-depth intervention of the United States and NATO , if Russia confirms that its strategic and political security is seriously threatened, the possibility of using nuclear weapons will be greatly increased. For Russia, as long as the benefits brought by using nuclear weapons are greater than that of not using nuclear weapons, they have the urge to use nuclear weapons.
is still the same as before. Because the United States, which has no checks and balances, abuses its power and status to squeeze Russia, if Russia thinks that it has been forced into a corner and only by using nuclear weapons can the core interests of the country be safeguarded, they will definitely use nuclear weapons resolutely. Russia is not a nuclear country like India and Pakistan. If he really wants to use nuclear weapons to destroy it, what can the world do?
Don’t use simple morality to view the world. The morality you think is often not true morality, but others hope that you think that is morality. So, if you really want to "never use nuclear weapons", you should never force a great power to the point where there is nothing else but use nuclear weapons.
At present, many people are exaggerating the so-called "nuclear weapons must not be used", and I am afraid they are exaggerating the Russian threat theory more.
