people all want to be superior people, but how many people can really get what they want? If you cannot become a superior person by relying on your own abilities, using others to become an accessory to the superior person may be the ultimate choice of many women, and then your wife will become a personal superior by virtue of your husband. This is the case with the heroine in this movie.
heroine is a beautiful, charming, kind and loving person. Her dream is to set up a foundation to help the hard-working people at the bottom of society. Look, how great and noble ideals, but dreams are full, but reality is very skinny. She is not able to do what she dreams of, or she can never do this by relying on herself alone.
At this time, the heroine showed a more noble quality. Her ability was limited, but she had beauty and "wisdom". If she used these innate advantages, would she be able to fulfill her dream?
Indeed, she was rightly thought, it was all capital to succeed, so on that sunny and sunny day, she became the wife of the rich.
The rich man has a natural "domineering" and he is full of disdain for people at the bottom of society. Therefore, he just put his preferences into his position and set up a foundation. However, in this institution, the heroine is just a nominal consultant and cannot participate in any decision-making. From this we can see that although he married the heroine, from the bottom of his heart, he still had a little bit of the arrogance of a rich man, and even contempt, believing that the heroine is incapable of ability and qualification.
Although the couple each have their own thoughts, they can be regarded as having their own needs. The relationship is not particularly deep, but it is also called respecting each other as guests. One day, they thought about the world of two people and not being disturbed by others, so they came to a villa in a remote suburb for vacation. However, the arrival of an uninvited guest changed their previous peaceful and calm life.
Since there is no one living in this villa, a man wanted to try what it would be like to live in a rich man's house. So when he came to this villa, he unexpectedly met a rich couple who came here. In desperation, the man had to tie the two of them up and became a kidnapper.
But his purpose is not to kidnap others, so he doesn't even know how to get the money or negotiate with Fuhua. At this time, the rich man showed his arrogance and attitude of looking down on the lower-class people in society, and was not afraid of this "killer" at all, showing a disdainful expression. However, after all, they are rich people, and they are afraid that if the man is angry and embarrassed, they will attack them, so they cooperate very much to give advice to the man and think about spending money to eliminate disasters.
When this kind of plot appears in the film, people can't help but wonder if the thriller type played in the film introduction is wrong? Is this a comedy? The kidnapped arranged for the kidnappers to run away fees, and even taught him what to do? For example, keep him as a hostage and let his wife go out to get the money.
However, the introduction is indeed not to deceive me. Through the strange interaction between the three, everyone's inner world was analyzed bit by bit.
On the surface, the kidnapper is a person with absolute control, but his shabby appearance and dull methods are scoffed by the rich.
The rich man is an elite, and it is true, so he looks down on his wife and the kidnapper even more. Although he became a hostage to the kidnapper, he was always the one who led the kidnapper. His words and deeds remind the heroine at all times that everything you have is given by me, and you are nothing.
Although the heroine has become a rich wife, she feels extremely uncomfortable. She is just a nominal person in the charity organization, in name but not in reality. When each person takes the needs of her needs is unbalanced, problems will follow.
So the ending is not in the audience's imagination, but a reversal. This reversal is not done well, and it is even a bit tough, which is a bit difficult to understand. However, it is reasonable.
The ending is that the heroine kills the kidnappers and the rich, and gains freedom and money. She no longer has to look at the rich man's face, no longer has to hide behind her, she can do nothing, she can make decisions, and at the same time, she has become the best.An ending like
may make some extreme feminist worshippers cheer, but have you ever thought that she killed two people? Sure enough, the most poisonous thing is the woman's heart. Maybe someone will make excuses for her to say she is oppressed. And I just want to use one shot in the film to respond to this statement: the heroine of tells the robbers how she looked before she became a rich man. She was also a poor person, just like a kidnapper, who wanted to gain sympathy with this, and at the end of the day she said she missed her poverty and freedom. The robber told her: No, you are not the victim! lively irony!
Is the kidnapper damn? It shouldn't be that he just wanted to feel what the life of a rich man is like.
Does the rich man die? Not to mention, although his attitude towards the poor is sarcastic, contemptuous, and arrogant.
But neither sins to death.
On the contrary, the heroine uses other people's wealth to do good. Isn't this thief like this? But if you look good, you won’t continue to criticize you. If you want to criticize, you have to bear it.
Many people on the Internet say this is a Hitchcock thriller. In fact, it’s just a Hitchcock style edge. It’s more like an black humor film, talking about a social problem caused by the gap between the rich and the poor! Most of the hatred of the rich are caused by the contempt and arrogance of the rich.
killers jealous of the golden house, and the rich have money to possess Yan Ruyu. In the end, they found that both the golden house and Yan Ruyu were deadly!
