Those who say that Mao Zedong's era was poor and backward, miserable and unbearable to look back on are all nonsense with ulterior motives and cannot be refuted!
Was poverty during the Mao Zedong era? There was no poverty during the Maoist era. Poverty and wealth can only be compared to yesterday. Compared with 49 years ago, China's 800 million people, under the leadership of Chairman Mao, united around the party, built a poor and backward agricultural country into an industrial country in just 27 years, and became the sixth largest country in the world. large economies. Is this called poverty? The national economic foundation created during the Mao Zedong era, isn’t that called wealth? That is not only wealth, but also huge wealth that has laid the foundation for China for thousands of years! It is said that we have a demographic dividend due to reform and opening up, but where does that dividend come from? Doesn’t it all come from the Mao Zedong era? Even with today’s land fiscal policy, if land had not been nationalized during Mao Zedong’s era, how would we be able to sell land and develop real estate? How to build roads and high-speed rail that extend in all directions?
If we compare the Mao Zedong era with the present and say we are poor, and use it to attack the Mao Zedong era, it is even more untenable. They are looking at the Mao Zedong era from a static point of view. It is believed that development in the Mao Zedong era can only stay at 40 years ago. The Mao Zedong era used the socialist model to achieve world-renowned achievements in 27 years. If it develops for another 40 years, I think it will definitely not be worse than the United States. The strong development momentum in the later period of the Mao Zedong era has begun to show signs.
Mao Zedong’s era emphasized self-reliance, hard work, and diligence in building the country. At that time, the people suffered a little more and were a little tired because they were seeking eternal happiness for their descendants. As the saying goes, it may be bitter for a while, but it may be sweet forever! The people of that generation were willing to do so. They did not complain about hardships and tiredness. They believed that they were contributing to the construction of the motherland and regarded him as an honor. On the contrary, those who are hostile to the people are shouting that they are miserable. Is this normal?
The kind of attack on the Mao Zedong era on the grounds of suffering is an attack on the struggle outlook of all people in the Mao Zedong era on the basis of the bourgeois hedonistic outlook on life. They are definitely not fighting for the injustice of that generation of people, but are trying to discredit and counterattack.
Is Mao Zedong’s era backward? Mao Zedong’s era was not backward. On the contrary, the Mao Zedong era was the most advanced historical period for all mankind. In Mao Zedong's era, the social system was advanced and there was an incomparably superior socialist system; in Mao Zedong's era, the guiding ideology was advanced, guided by Marxism-Leninism Mao Zedong Thought; in Mao Zedong's era, the party's organization was advanced, with serving the people wholeheartedly as its highest purpose; in Mao Zedong's era, People's spiritual outlook is advanced and they advocate collectivism and communism; in the Mao Zedong era, the people were the most united and cohesive. Or how can we explain that we can defeat the number one imperialism of later generations with backward weapons and equipment? Or, how can we explain that we will build the Red Flag Canal and 86,000 reservoirs without any mechanical equipment? Or how can we successfully develop with two bombs and one star ? Or can we take more than 20 years to go through the path that Western developed countries have gone through for more than 200 years and achieve industrialization?
Such huge historical progress and achievements are turned a blind eye, and instead they are said to be poor and backward, unbearable to look back on, and miserable. Isn't this nonsense and nonsense? Isn't this a smear attack?
Why do some people do this? This can only show that the achievements that the people hope to achieve are not the achievements that some people want, and the happiness that the people pursue is not the happiness that some people want. Their interests are opposed to those of the people. Apart from this explanation, Is there any more suitable explanation?
