Nationalizes platform economy such as Didi , Taobao, Ant , Tencent , Meituan , etc., and most people understand and support the viewpoint of national security and people's livelihood. Of course, it is foreseeable that there are still many people who do not understand or support it. Those who do not understand are mostly lacking in learning and thinking, while those who do not support must dig deep into the ideological roots and positions behind them. Here I will specifically refute and discuss with unsupported people for everyone to discuss.
1, please don’t care about the logic of time and reverse the historical concepts of “new” and “old”. corresponds to nationalization and privatization. So, which is "new" or "old"?
1, privatization began in the ancient slave society. Private was born in the late primitive society, due to the development of productivity, especially the emergence of metal tools and the emergence of surplus products, which promoted the emergence of large division of labor in social labor and the emergence of individual production. Because of the large division of labor in society, the leaders who exchange surplus products on behalf of clans or tribes can use public service and take the surplus products obtained from the exchange for themselves; while the emergence of individual production, that is, the emergence of individual labor and individual operations, gradually transforms means of production and productive products into personal private property. This is the origin of privatization and private ownership, and it has existed for at least 8,000 years.
2, nationalization began with the October Revolution in the modern era. The Soviet Union used revolutionary means to change the capitalist private ownership in the industry, making it a process of socialist ownership . The nationalization of industrial enterprises began at the end of 1917 and was basically completed in the late 1920s. By 1938, before World War II, the Soviet Union's industrial output value became the second industrial power behind the United States, with a global share of 17.6%, surpassing Germany and becoming the first industrial power in Europe. According to some data, from 1926 to 1936, the average annual growth rate of the Soviet Union reached 28.4%. It can be seen that nationalization promoted the great economic development of the Soviet Union, and the speed was amazing.
From the above, one was born 80 centuries ago and the other was born 1 century ago. It is clear at a glance which is new and which is old. We must stand at the height of human history, rather than be limited to the 30 years of China's specific time and space to determine the new or old.
2, please don’t have the “double standards” to talk about things, bitch talks about Tao Te Ching . Rather than saying that nationalization involves economic system, it involves national security. Some people think they have the right to speak, and wantonly detain nationalization as a result of the old path, attacking the viewpoint of nationalization. Little do we know that Western countries have never hesitated to implement nationalization when it comes to national security. But these opposing people deliberately ignore it, and they learn very well in double standards.
Home-branded Capitalist countryUK experienced two "nationalization" climaxes in the last century from 1945 to 1951 and 1974 to 1975. In addition to nationalizing Bank of England , many departments such as railways, coal mines, inland shipping, which were on the verge of bankruptcy were also nationalized. At present, state-owned industrial and transportation enterprises have become an important part of the UK economy, accounting for 11.1% of the GDP of and 20% of the total domestic fixed capital investment. State-owned enterprises account for 100% of the proportion of coal mining, electricity, railways, postal, telecommunications, gas and other departments; most of the shipbuilding, aircraft manufacturing and steel industry, 2/5 of automobile manufacturing, and 1/4 of oil production are also controlled by state-owned enterprises.
Even today in the 21st century, the West will not block the path of nationalization. Just as the Russian-Ukrainian conflict caused a sharp rise in electricity, oil and gas prices in European countries, many European countries are discussing and studying measures to nationalize power grids and oil and gas companies to curb energy prices. For example, the French Prime Minister announced on July 6 that France plans to fully nationalize French power company , and said that this move can ensure France's energy security when the energy crisis occurs in Europe. Other European countries are also introducing similar measures. German Le Monde recently reported that the German Bundestag passed a revised new version of the draft energy security law in May, and according to regulations, the country can take over energy companies in a state of emergency.
Why can Russia withstand the crazy sanctions of the United States and EU ? It is closely related to the fact that after Putin took office through nationalization, it has taken back control from the oligarch . Otherwise, if Russia's oil and gas companies are still under control by pro-Western oligarchs today, Russia may face the secondary disintegration after the collapse of , the Soviet Union, and the collapse of .
The above facts show that nationalization is more about the need for national security, has nothing to do with social systems, and has nothing to do with ideological . But those who oppose nationalization dare not talk about national security, because after talking, they can’t find the lines. They had to take the hat of "taking the old path", but they never mentioned the nationalization in Western history and the current situation, and they dared not accuse them of following the old path. They were completely a bitch talking about the Tao Te Ching, and they learned the ability of "double standards" smoothly!
3, please don’t generalize or criticize. Some of those who oppose the word and reason, throw the issue that domestic oil prices are not cheap, in order to prove that state-owned monopoly is equal to low efficiency and high prices. This is a generalization of the matter, a leaf blocks the eyes and cannot see Mount Tai.
1. The state-owned economy not only has oil and gas, but also includes electricity, water, railways, postal and other areas of people's livelihood. my country's terminal prices in electricity prices, water prices, parity passenger transport, postal and other industries are generally affordable, and some have not changed for decades, supporting the industrial economy and fulfilling people's lives. In contrast, in the Western European countries, power companies, , have not been nationalized, took the opportunity to raise prices in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and the living electricity prices of residents increased by more than 10 times year-on-year, which made people miserable.
2. Even if China's oil prices exceed some people's expectations, they will gradually adjust to the appropriate level with the realization of oil and gas strategic goals, the improvement of refining and processing technology, and the strengthening of management. In other words, the current domestic oil prices are conducive to the accumulation of necessary capital by the "two barrels of oil" to develop overseas oil fields, build refining and chemical bases, improve refining technology, and improve supply guarantee capabilities. At the same time, with the implementation of anti-corruption and the adjustment of excessive income of some state-owned enterprise employees in the income distribution reform, it will generally lead to cost reduction and efficiency improvement. In addition, maintaining appropriate relatively high oil prices will be conducive to the development of new energy vehicles and serve the national industrial transformation and upgrading strategy.
3, in the face of national security, the price is not up to date. Huawei 's telecommunications equipment products are both advanced and cheap? Why do the United States and Europe prefer to use backward equipment from Western companies at high prices rather than exclude Huawei? Regarding this, those who oppose nationalization with high oil prices may also be speechless.
Therefore, those who oppose nationalization use oil prices to argue about the role of the state-owned economy, their views are really lacking in height, and they are generalized by a side, unscientific and incomplete, and are not worth refuting at all.
