Why do many parents not support "double reduction"?
is clearly fighting for more childhood freedom for students and for the good of their children, but why don’t parents support it?
is very simple. The problem parents think about is the immediate problem. If the academic burden is reduced and extracurricular training is limited, then the child's grades will decline and parents will be anxious.
Because the child's grades have declined, he cannot enter a good high school when he is diversion in the middle school entrance examination, and he cannot enter a good university when he is dividing in the college entrance examination, and there are no many opportunities in his life.
From this perspective, parents certainly do not support "double reduction".
But in fact, the parents' pattern is too low.
subject training may be cancelled next year? Some parents panicked that the double reduction of
is still being implemented step by step, but subject training cannot be completely eliminated in a short period of time. At present, strict regulations have been made for teachers in school, prohibiting teachers from running cram schools outside the school. Once discovered, there will be fines, which will affect career development and revoke the teacher qualification certificate.
Any tutoring for the purpose of collecting tutoring fees is illegal and relevant regulations.
At present, off-campus subject training has not been completely eliminated, but it is clearly stipulated that children cannot take up holiday time, and large-scale control has been achieved.
online subject training will be completely eliminated next year, and children will be given a clean and relaxed educational environment.
After seeing this news, many parents' reactions were: If the subject training is really completely cancelled, what should the child do in the exam? Who will be responsible if the child fails to go to school?
Parents only look at the current children's entrance examinations, because they really have no time to take care of the future. In the eyes of parents, if the entrance examinations cannot be completed smoothly and cannot enter a good school, then the future is empty talk.
"Since the test scores are finally divided and layered, don't restrict others from studying hard!" This is a common voice.
In fact, there is a concept here that has been stolen. The policy does not restrict reading, but only restricts extracurricular training. If the child is willing to improve, he can of course study hard at home, which is all voluntary.
Why do we have to implement "double reduction"?
If a child can only rely on extracurricular training to complete his grades, can he really become better and better after graduating from college?
is really not like this. Those who can quickly adapt to the workplace after graduating from college, find a position in the workplace, or continue to further their studies and achieve success after graduating from college, are often those with strong autonomy, and students with strong autonomy do not need to maintain their grades through tutoring from high school.
tutoring can improve grades in a short time. Practicing questions is a repetitive action. If you read too much, your grades will improve in a short time. This is inevitable, but what happens later? After college, when no one comes to urge you to do the questions repeatedly, and the questions cannot solve any practical problems, the disadvantages will arise.
" add extracurricular training to achieve a short-term improvement in grades" what is created is not talent . These people are only suitable for exams, not for innovation and in-depth research, and are not the talents we need. There may be individual cases, but generally speaking, improving academic performance through training classes will not play any role in improving children's personal abilities.
In fact, the policy is very obvious now. It is necessary to use such policies to put pressure on parents, pay more attention to the cultivation of children's quality, focus on improving children's independence and self-reliance, and focus on improving children's thinking and innovation abilities. is the most beneficial to children's long-term development.
In the long run, "double reduction" is very helpful for purifying the educational environment
When there is no policy intervention, the educational environment will continue to be completed. Although the college entrance examination is to select talents, success or failure is judged by the results. In order to improve the children's grades, parents can only get more and more exams.
spends a lot of money to make up for the children, participate in extracurricular training, improve their children's grades, make themselves breathless and make them breathless.
When others do this, when the environment is like this, many parents have to follow the trend to do this, because many people believe that spending money to class may not necessarily result, but if you don’t spend money to class, there will definitely be no result.
This is also one of the reasons why some children have become more and more vulnerable in recent years. They have been under tremendous pressure at a young age and cannot breathe. What they can feel is suffocation and despair.
With the support of the "double reduction" policy, it clears out external obstacles, purifies the school atmosphere, brings the educational environment back to its original appearance, and gives children a relatively relaxed childhood, which can save many unfortunate children.
Parents may still be worried about the question of "If you can't make up for classes, your grades will drop, what should you do?" In fact, if you change the angle, you can feel relieved. In three years of high school, you have added tutoring and improved your academic performance in a short period of time. However, after college, children bottomed out and completely let themselves go, and they still cannot find the direction with real talents and knowledge. Isn't the result the same?
What's more, even without extracurricular tutoring, children may not be able to do it. As long as the children are independent and hard enough, they still have a bright future.
