During this period, the topic of "school charges" has become a hot topic on the Internet. The charging items that schools have followed have made parents miserable. There is no most bizarre fee, only more bizarre. A middle school in Daqing, Heilongjiang charges students 20 yuan of "leaf fee", which has refreshed everyone's perception.
By this season, the climate in the Northeast region is already very cold and dry, the earth is bleak, and the plants and trees are withering. In order to protect the vegetation of schools from damage and retain a hint of green on campus, it has become a problem facing various schools.
At this time, parents of a private middle school in Zhaozhou, Daqing received an announcement in the class group that made them confused. The general idea was that the school required each student to bring 3 sacks of leaves back to school after school to keep the school's vegetation warm and prevent the cold. However, considering that many students are inconvenient to collect, they can go to the school's "Uncle Xu" to buy it, and each person charges 20 yuan.
It is understood that the practice of charging 20 yuan for the "leaf fee" in the fall semester has been implemented in this school for several years, and it is only charged to each class of first-year students, and does not require it.
Maybe the relevant personnel think that this is already the "old tradition" of the school, and this year it will definitely be able to collect the "leaves fee" smoothly, but some parents don't believe in this evil and directly publicize the relevant information to let netizens see that there is such a charging item, which has caused heated discussion among netizens. After
triggered public opinion, the local education bureau quickly launched an investigation and responded: saying that this matter was the behavior of one officer in the school, that is, "Uncle Xu" in the group announcement, and "Uncle Xu" is not a school staff member.
At present, the school has ordered "Uncle Xu" to explain in the group and report criticism and handling.
But netizens obviously did not buy into this explanation and questioned: Since this "Uncle Xu" is not a school staff member, how could he have the authority to send notification information in the school's official work group? How could other teachers and school staff in other groups ignore it? Moreover, this "leaf fee" has been collected for so many years. Do school administrators have no idea at all? Doesn't the school supervise? Is this "Uncle Xu" "taking the blame"?
Many people also complained about the "sexy operation" of their children's school: they have set up a new access control, and the school collects "access control fees", making the school look like they enter a 5A scenic spot; the water dispenser has to swipe the card, and every time they call water, they have to be deducted; there are also dishwashing fees and blowing head fees... In short, you can't imagine that there is no school that dares not collect.
I have to say that in the field of "carrying children to make them", some schools and teachers really grasp it tightly. Although the teaching quality is not very good, plundering parents' money to make them absolutely IQ online, and never miss any opportunity to pluck their hair by. Because their children's studies are controlled by schools and teachers, most of the time, parents often dare not speak out even though they know that they are "random charges", and they can only submit. No wonder there is a saying: children's money is the best to make.
The campus should have been pure and full of bookish fragrance, but it was made up of by some managers and teachers, and the school’s credibility in the hearts of students and parents was overdrawn in their eyes, becoming one of the causes of increasingly sharp conflicts between home and school.
Regarding the behavior and phenomena of "random charges" by schools and teachers, the relevant departments have repeatedly banned the behavior and phenomena of "random charges" and established relevant systems to inspect related issues. However, judging from the frequent exposure of "random charges" during this period, it is still far from enough. A stricter and more complete system must be established so that students and parents dare to say no to "random charges" and dare to report them. Once verified, the relevant responsible persons must pay a heavier price.
