The most concerned issue for students now is when the method test will be postponed to .
We might as well push backwards along the time.
Generally speaking, the legal examination will definitely give results 2 years ago. This year's Spring Festival is relatively early. On New Year's Eve on January 21, the latest time for the results to be announced is
in mid-January (it will not be released two days before New Year's Eve, so the rhythm is too tight).
. The subjective test is manual marking, and it is necessary to organize the marking in colleges and universities, which generally takes about 1 month. Considering the winter vacation of colleges and universities, the national exam will almost be completed from early December to mid-year.
So from the perspective of time, the time for taking the test is mainly concentrated in October and November. Then, the factors such as National Day holiday , epidemic prevention and control , Top 20 , , and are included. The examination arrangement is likely to be as follows:
① Around the end of October, an objective test for the postponed area will be conducted, and a subjective test will be conducted nationwide around mid-November.
② At around the end of October, non-deferred areas will conduct subjective tests; in November, the postponed areas will conduct objective tests and subjective tests.
From the perspective of preparation difficulty, if the subjective questions can be tested together, it will naturally be better (after all, one less paper can be produced and one less paper can be read). Moreover, judging from the objective questions and test questions feedback from the students, this year's test questions seem to be limited, which is suspected of combining and reusing the real questions in previous years. In this case, subjective questions are naturally the best one to finish the exam.
To sum up, the exam is more likely to be arranged in the first 1 . What do you think?
Of course, how to arrange it in the end is still to based on announcement of the Ministry of Justice . But students must be clear that no matter how the exam is arranged, there is really not much time left for everyone!
This year's objective questions are very flexible, and subjective questions should not be easy. If you want to pass the exam smoothly at one time, you must adjust your status and actively prepare for the battle. For , especially for candidates in postponed areas, the home-object review is the key to winning!
01
Why do you need to review the subject and the guest?
Judging from the real questions of the legal examination in recent years, comprehensive , case-based , practical are the mainstream examination trends. The legal examination is no longer satisfied with "I ask you and answer", but requires candidates to apply what they have learned, and even learn to activate it.
This point is particularly evident in the objective tests in non-deferred areas this year. The biggest feature of this year's objective test is the reuse of the actual test cases from previous years, especially some objective questions borrow from the subjective test cases from previous years, such as the following question:
case: A company boss A took B to KTV to sing, and during this period there was a conflict with the KTV security guard. B secretly called someone without telling A, calling four people with a gun, calling four people with a gun (A didn't know about it), and five other people who did not hold guns. KTV called out several security guards to gather in the parking lot at the same time. When A left, he found that the KTV was crowded with people. He was a little angry and said, "Beat them" and left. Then B instructed ABCD to shoot at the security guard, ABC shoots at the sky and the earth, D aims at a security guard's key point and shoots the security guard to death on the spot. Are the following statements correct?
A. B constitutes intentional homicide
B.d constitutes intentional homicide
C.abc constitutes intentional homicide
D. A constitutes intentional injury (death)
The answer to the above question is A, B, D
Analysis:
A option is correct, B instructs others to shoot at someone is an instigation of intentional homicide, and finally d beats the person to death, which constitutes intentional homicide. Option B, d. Shooting at a person means that he has intention to kill someone, and finally beat him to death, which constitutes intentional homicide. Option C, abc shoots at the world and indicates that the three of them have no intention to kill, and the shooting is not a harmful act of intentional homicide, and does not constitute intentional homicide. At the same time, the question does not describe that the three of them have no intention to contact D, and do not have to be responsible for D's behavior.In option D, since A does not know that someone is carrying a gun, his instigation behavior is subjectively inferred as intentional injury, but there is also negligence in the death result, and the death result is to deal with the intentional injury, which constitutes intentional injury to cause death. The question of the question
is basically adapted from the subjective topic of the Criminal Law in 2018, which modified a small number of task relationships and the meaning of accomplices, but the overall framework can be said to be exactly the same.
So similar situations may occur in the following objective tests in the subsequent delayed examination area. So, take advantage of the fact that you have done the subjective questions of previous years in advance and become familiar with the case, and you may see "familiar faces" in future exams.
, and this also tells us from the side: objective and subjective questions can no longer be completely separated from reviewing . Because in the objective test, multiple choice questions and indefinite multiple choice questions are the key to winning, and they are essentially solving case problems, which coincides with the focus of the subjective questions.
The current legal examination review is a bit like the judicial examination before the reform. The original judicial examination was to review subjectively and objectively together, and the exam was completed at one time. It was not like now, with objective and subjective questions taking separate exams.
Therefore, the integrated review of the subject and the guest is considered a "tradition". If you want to quickly improve your abilities, solve practical problems, and pass the legal exam smoothly, it is imperative to review the subject and the object in an integrated manner!
02
How should I learn it now?
Xiaolan has always emphasized that everyone has different foundations and different paces of preparation for the exam. They cannot completely copy other people's learning plans. They need to review based on their own actual situation. This is the most targeted and most efficient.
So, Xiaolan gave extension areas , non-extended areas , , , and , and , and , and . The students of World War II , respectively prepared review plans and preparation suggestions. Please "take the seat" and absorb and reuse them based on their own actual situation:
1
For candidates who postponed:
. For candidates who postponed:
suggest completed 3 subjective questions every week, and past real questions cases , it is best to place them on holidays or weekends, leaving a large amount of time for exercises. At the beginning, if you don’t know how to answer the questions, copy the standard answers and try to organize your own language answers. You can practice the real questions repeatedly.
2
For non-deferred candidates,
performs standard case (800-1200 words) writing training, 1-2 s are taught every day, with real questions as the main and predicted cases as supplements. Only when you can't remember some knowledge points at all, listen to the corresponding courseware. Be sure to control the answer time for single subject questions within 40 minutes .
3
For subjective candidates in World War II
If you have been learning knowledge points this year, then based on your own actual situation, you can implement the above plan.
If you haven’t reviewed much so far, then you have to to go through the knowledge point courses again , especially civil litigation. There are certain modifications this year and you need to take a good look. After that, practice case questions.
03
How to prevent points loss during the exam?
Xiaolan shared some exam preparation plans and methods, but if you want to avoid losing points in the exam, you also need to pay attention to some misunderstandings and details.
1
Objective question part
In the objective question part, there are three most likely misunderstandings that are missing points, namely misunderstanding , misunderstanding and confusing . Let’s explain one by one. Candidates in the postponement area should pay attention to
① Misunderstanding
Misunderstanding questions test the concepts and characteristics of the statutory situation of knowledge points . Generally, a case or description will be given and the candidate will be asked to judge which concept should belong. The questioner will often add a lot of invalid information outside the statutory situation.
The most common part of the examination of "principles" in criminal law, civil law, jurisprudence , and other disciplines. This type is easier to deal with in single choices, and some interference items are generally added in multiple choice questions.
② Missing
The omission question tests the memory and memorization of the provisions of the knowledge points and laws. Generally, some rules and regulations will be given to let you judge right or wrong, or list some procedures to ask if your approach is correct. The question-setting person will generally change some terms and nouns to induce you to choose the wrong choice. There are more tests in the two Litigation Law , Administrative Law , Commercial Law , and the Constitution.
In addition, the trend of discipline combination has worsened in recent years, but in fact, this is also a confusing method. Never miss key information just because you are disturbed. Just break it one by one and use the logic of increasing judgment between options to easily deal with it.
③ Confusing
There are two main questions about confusing: One is about display of opinions or mixing some value judgments of life and law, which will cause confusion to you. Fortunately, there are not many questions every year, and they are concentrated in civil law and criminal law. They are basically the most difficult questions in the test paper every year, and few people can do it correctly;
Another type is to assist in judging from the logical relationship of options. There are several questions of this type every year. Once it is identified, you should remind yourself to appropriately apply the legal principles and corresponding theories.
2
Subjective question part
Starting from 2021, the Ministry of Justice has increased the examination of the understanding of the legal provisions in the review of the documents . The most obvious thing is the Criminal Law, which requires candidates to analyze the legal provisions from different angles.
. According to the reliable message , will also give higher scores to the answers that can be used in French language when marking papers. Therefore, the current subjective test cannot be easily dealt with by memorizing knowledge points or templates.
In addition to conducting basic legal analysis, it must also be able to organize standardized language for output, and can also answer the law exam serial numbers in multiple places, so that you can step ahead and pass the test smoothly.
