For example, a Japanese teacher talks about grammar on the blackboard. This is ability. However, even if you are not a Japanese teacher and don’t know much about teaching Japanese, you can still conduct business negotiations with Japanese people. This is called strength. I once met the person in charge of the Japanese branch of a company who came to Japan from China. I heard that he had no experience studying in Japan, but when doing business work with Japan, he found that he was better than most international students... I think this kind of talent He is a person who has both ability and potential/strength.
Another example is that a teacher who guides international students in their studies teaches how to write essays and research proposals. This is called ability. It can also be said that they have the qualifications of an excellent critic. However, the actual essay, The range of knowledge involved in setting the questions is very wide. Suppose that all the short papers from the Dongda past question bank in recent years are put on the table and put into practical use. How many real questions can be written in the science/liberal subjects and what are they written? degree? This kind of on-the-spot performance and speaking of truth are completely different concepts. No matter how good your commenting/critical skills are, most people will not dare to try them if they are not capable. To be honest, I also have a few explanations of Dongda’s actual past questions in my video. Although I looked up some information online, I am not sure how well I can write in the actual exam. Even if I am allowed to use a computer to look up information, it is not easy to write well in the limited time, but at least it is very good. Know clearly the actual depth of a person's strength.
Another example is the letter of reasons for tutoring. This is relatively simple. In a sense, ordinary senior international students can write it. The problem is that the content of the letter of reasons for tutoring seems to be the same, but whether it is reliable or not will be included in the interview procedures. It will really be confirmed~ In other words, how reliable the content of this part is depends on whether the content corresponds to/links to the questions that are asked every year in the actual interview. This must be fully combined with the actual level of the student, not The ambiguous/abstract/advanced content is a question-and-answer QA simulation training form (as shown in the picture). When tutoring middle school students to ask about the specific meaning of any point in the statement of reasons for aspirations, it must be able to be understood/accepted by the students. , because the actual interview answers should not take more than 2 to 3 minutes. Generally, questions can be asked in about 30 seconds, and the places there are also about 2 seconds. In other words, answers must be targeted, and the use of simple and clear/easy to understand Only in this way can we see the depth of actual ability.
