This article was first published as "strategy". The author authorized to push
local time. On December 3, local time, when Musk attended the Twitter space voice conference, he once again made it clear that " has no idea of suicide. If I commit suicide, it is not true, but I was killed by someone. ." In combination with the continuous disclosure of eye-catching news such as "Twitter deleted posts for Biden for Little " to the public in the form of live text broadcasts on December 2, the news that " Musk said he would not commit suicide " has spread across major platforms around the world.
Has Musk received a death threat? With the past style of the ruling team that is consistent with Clinton + Biden + Obama , Musk's statement is not groundless. Those who have some secrets, whether it is Epstein , Benghazi ambassador Stevens, or virtual currency , who have died continuously recently, they are all inseparable from the U.S. Democratic Party in power.
Therefore, Musk made such a revelation and putting himself in a protective cover of public opinion, which may not be alarmist, or he has actually received a death warning.
This is not the first time Musk has applied for public opinion protection. On May 9th local time, Musk tweeted for no reason, " If I die mysteriously, then I am very happy to know you. "
So what is the reason why Musk is warned of death? Many people take it for granted that it was the revelation of the Biden Jr. scandal, offending the Democratic Party, who is good at conspiring to assassinate. Therefore, we happily watched Musk and Wang Dong join together to watch the drama of American infighting. However, I want to pour a bucket of cold water on everyone. If there is a doubt, at least one: the timing of is wrong!
Musk completed the Twitter acquisition on October 27 local time, and fired the next day to control the actual operation of Twitter. It is said that the three giants of the "Indian Gang" that are one-sided in politics, namely CEO Parag Agra Var , Chief Financial Officer Ned Siegel, and Vijaya Gard, head of legal affairs and policy. The US midterm elections will only begin on November 8, and during this period, Musk and the US Republican will operate for 10 days.
, but Musk broke the news and chose to go to the US midterm elections after almost settled. Based on the currently released news about Biden Jr. and the emails from the US Democratic Party interfering in controlling the media, it can be said that if is operated before the midterm elections, the "red wave" of the US Republican Party is likely to be realized.
But if it is for the 2024 US presidential election, it is used too early according to the past logic. This kind of killer weapon is usually released one year later or in the first half of 2024, and will definitely have the greatest impact on the Democratic Party. But Musk chose a time point with the least impact on American politics. How political is it?
is so politically conscious, and it is also a symbol of the American technology god-making movement. The richest man in the world. If the Biden authorities really threaten Musk for this reason, then the political life of the Biden authorities will definitely end. What exactly caused Musk to be warned of death? Who warned Musk?
Before answering these two questions, let's take a look at the reasons why Musk hyped the Biden Jr.'s scandal at this point in time. It is not difficult to see from the above that Musk chose a relatively clever time point, which is a time node with the least impact on the political ecology of the United States. To avoid politics, then calculations are mostly economic benefits. Therefore, analyzing the reasons for Musk's hype, we still have to return to the essence: Musk is a businessman, pursuing profit !
44 billion US dollars, although in terms of Musk's wealth, it's just a piece of cake; but the 44 billion yuan that took out real money still made Musk feel worried.Moreover, after the acquisition, a group of Democratic investors and competitors, Waige Musk, withdrew their advertising investment from Twitter. This is difficult for Musk, who has always been smart, to do a loss-making deal of US$44 billion such a large amount.
So it needs heavy information to keep Twitter's continuous exposure and attractiveness, so that the withdrawn companies will regret it. If you are interested in doing statistics, you will find that since Musk released the acquisition of Twitter, the number of times Musk and Twitter have been on the hot search headlines has increased significantly.
Take the recent example. unblocked Trump , Trump's fans soared, Twitter layoffs, Twitter and Apple threats, and the top 2 have almost been on the headlines of major media and online platforms around the world every time. , you said, is there any trick to promote Twitter more efficiently than this?
is simply a fucking global platform! Two data indicators for social media are examined: -day downloads and daily active users, and Twitter has both increased significantly recently. 's average daily downloads in November increased by 28% compared with last month, and compared with September this year, the number of downloads increased by 46%; on November 6, daily active users reached a new Twitter record of 245.4 million.
2 month data will generally be postponed. However, with the , which is full of eye-catching elements such as Biden, , which is full of eye-catching elements such as , palace fighting, game of throne, war conspiracy, money transactions, etc., will definitely attract a large number of people who are obsessed with melons to tweet. Recently, the Chinese public opinion field has suddenly spread that Musk may contain Chinese descent, which is actually a signal that Musk may sell Twitter to China.
You said that if Musk's Twitter opened up the Chinese market, would those advertisers who have recently "behaved politically correct" and withdrawn orders regret it to death? In fact, Chinese social media also needs to be more careful. The hype is false and has Musk's Chinese origin, but it is just to make wedding dresses for your competitors . Think about Zalberg . In order to enter the Chinese market, that guy went to Beijing to make various shows, showing his love with his daughter-in-law of a yellow race and saying "love China". , when you see that Chinese law does not allow extraterritorial power, you immediately changed your face and became an anti-China pioneer.
Shouldn’t Musk receive death threats when doing business with such a conscious mind? The problem is also: Musk has extraordinary exposure and cross-border creation of an ecosystem.
November Before the US midterm elections , Musk publicly called for following tradition and voting for the Republican Party.
On November 28, Musk threatened Apple that if Twitter is removed from the app store, it will create its own phone. Afterwards, Apple admitted defeat and launched the Twitter app again.
On December 3, Musk launched a poll on Twitter of "Whether to pardon Assange and Snowden ", and the survey results showed that 80.5% of people supported pardons. This will undoubtedly put tremendous pressure on the US Democratic authorities who insist on extraditioning Assange and chasing Snowden. Assange's wiki decrypted, and the 2016 revelations were one of the important reasons why Hillary Clinton won the election in .
The three things mentioned above in the past only show that Musk has a huge influence and has almost interfered in the direction of many areas of US business, internal affairs, diplomacy and other affairs.
is so high-profile. In our traditional perception, no one will be so desperate and confront the state machine. There is only one ending: there is no place to die. But Musk did it and continued to succeed.
Why does it come here?
Let's take a look at the industrial ecosystem under Musk's name: Falcon Rocket , Dragon Spaceship , Starlink system, PayPal payment system (for sale), virtual currency, Tesla car , Tesla robot, brain control chip and Twitter, etc.
From the perspective of power, Musk has laid out space rights, air rights (he has repeatedly advised the US Air Force to use independent drone to fight China), financial system, land rights (Tesla industry can easily transform into land war robots), biological rights (brain control chips) and information rights (network software and hardware and media) , etc.
Musk collects intelligence information through Tesla cars, transmits information through Starlink, publishes information through Twitter, through Falcon and Tesla operations, and controls through brain control chips......
It can be said that if it continues to develop, the enterprise group under Musk will become a huge force with force, economy, finance, intelligence information, intelligence information, and public opinion. Originally, a violent control system can be completed by a country and at least a relatively developed and middle-aged country. Musk has the ability to complete it alone.
For example, autonomous robots are further applied on a large scale (which has caused controversy recently. San Francisco Police Department allows the deployment of robot police to kill people), then Musk will be able to quickly arm a large number of air and land combat robot warriors, and Musk may be able to form an army by one; for example, the Starlink system combination brain control chip is the satellite + brain control chip in Resident Evil to control the scene of the protagonist Alice; plus the control of the information platform of Twitter....
As technology and social forms accelerate changes, do you say that enterprises and individuals with such great power will still succumb to national rules? The answer is obviously no, maybe the rules themselves are set by them.
The vassal states and military governors in history, and the warlords of China and foreign countries in modern history, all of them became local emperors, either established themselves as kings, or challenged the authority of the central government and caused the country to fall apart after their strength expanded. With the large number of applications of armed robots, especially intelligent autonomous unmanned armed robots, it will surely give manufacturing companies the opportunity to form an army and an armed group. It is natural for such powerful individuals and enterprises to have different thoughts.
You should know that the most important reason why a country is a country is that it has violent institutions. When enterprises have such capabilities, it will be inevitable to challenge and break the traditional national social power structure.
In fact, even if there are no violent agencies, those companies that have obtained huge economic power through various means are also challenging state power after inflation. Such as the famous Bund bombing incident, and the phenomenon that many companies think they are "too big to fail" kidnap local or even national policies.
When the violent machine is not unique to national organizations, this challenge will only be more prominent and violent.
As for the United States, its state power will no longer be exclusive to traditional financial chaebols. Musk, a new industrial armed capital force of non-old families, will get a share of it.
Musk's above unruly behavior is itself a natural reaction after his own strength is expanded. Weili belongs to itself, and may not have reached the level of individuals fighting against national violent institutions alone, but enterprise-level organizations have already had such signs with the development of artificial intelligence and information technology.
Musk's behavior actually challenged the entire traditional power system, and offended the entire Wall Street financial chaebol power circle, that is, the entire establishment, not just the Biden administration and the US Democratic Party.
Therefore, if you send a notice of death to Musk, you will be a new consensus among the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States. even under the current circumstances, because Musk offended the Democratic Party more ruthlessly, the big guy behind the scenes is even stronger about Musk getting rid of it and getting it quicker. Musk will naturally blame Biden for any accident.This situation gives Republicans the assassination, which not only eliminates the hidden dangers of institutional power, but also frames the Democratic Party.
So it is not ruled out that the US Republican Party is more likely to assassinate Musk.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-