[Qi Dasheng Discusses the Offline Internet] [Coffee] Good morning, greetings to everyone in Shanghai by shaking Ye Feng’s heart-wrenching [Fist] #Robot#​#Legal#​Intelligent robot applications are becoming more and more common. When we call customer service, many of them are robot

[Qi Dasheng Discusses the offline Internet] [Coffee]

Good morning, greetings to everyone in Shanghai by shaking Ye Feng’s heart-warming [Close Fist]

Intelligent robot applications are becoming more and more common.

When we call customer service, many of them are robots. A little lower-level one means that you recommend the answers set in advance based on your voice keywords. A little higher-level one can directly communicate with human-computer. The welcome robot at the entrance of the mall can send welcome speeches, and can search store information with voice, which can be a little simple to entertain. As for Siri, Xiaoai, Xiaoyi and others on the phone, the intelligence level has reached an unexpected level.

With the popularization of robot technology, some robots that commit crimes may appear. Some may be due to program errors, while others may be intentional. In this case, how to define the criminal subject of ?

Obviously, robots themselves cannot be used as criminal subjects. They are created and have no legal personality. So, who should bear the responsibility for the crime?

If the owner of the robot bears the responsibility for the criminal behavior of the robot, it is sometimes not fair. Someone bought a robot, and the robot committed a crime, but the owner actually did not have the ability to control the robot's behavior.

If the robot manufacturer, the legal person, bears the responsibility for criminal acts, sometimes there seems to be problems, because the corporate legal person cannot fully control the robot's running procedures.

If robot development engineers take responsibility for robot criminal behavior, there is no basis for law. They do not even have a legal status to come to the table during the production and use of robots. Besides, if the developer of a robot needs to take responsibility for the crimes of his works, would God create human stories in Genesis require God to take responsibility for the crimes of human beings?

defines the responsibility for robot criminal behavior, which seems to be a real problem.

[On thesis starting point: The so-called traditional enterprises are to find customers based on products; the so-called Internet enterprises are to encircle people first and then provide products/services according to the needs of these people]