vivos15
Screen: 6.62-inch racing screen
120Hz refresh rate
resolution: 2400x1080 pixels
System software: OrlalnOS OCean
processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
front camera: 32 megapixel
rear camera: 64 megapixel optical anti-shake ultra-photosensitive camera + 8 million ultra-wide angle + 2 million macro camera
battery: 4500 capacity
charger: 66w flash charge
s15
Advantages: 5G dual-mode full network access, dual-sIM dual standby, the processor is also good with Snapdragon 870, it is also good to play games and watch movies, the camera rear camera has clearer optical anti-shake, the full scene NFC, z-axis linear motor, combined with charging 66w flash charging, can reach 50% in 18 minutes, Antutu runs 770,000+ is quite good!
vivos15pro
Screen: 6.56-inch Samsung E5 curved screen
120Hz refresh rate
resolution: 2376x1080 pixels
System version: OrlalnOS OCean-based Android 12
CPU: Dimensity 8100 independent display chip pro
front camera: 32 million autofocus
rear camera: 50 million pixels Sony customized lMX766V + 12 million pixels ultra-wide-angle macro camera + 2 million pixels black and white camera
battery: 4500 mAh
charger: 80W dual-core flash charge
vivos15pro
Native advantages: the camera is clearer and visible, the processor is paired with the flagship core Dimensity 8100 independent display chip, the dual-core synergy performance is stronger, and it is a strong e-sports mobile phone. The charger is paired with 80W dual-core flash charge, and it can reach 70% in 18 minutes. .Antutu test score can also be 830,000 +
Other features: x-axis linear motor, closed stereo dual speakers, stronger dynamic, and one-card NFC in all scenes.
Personal opinion: The two disadvantages are not infrared, the advantages are 5G full network connection, the vivos15pro is better and better, both dual-slot dual standby mobile phone , with large memory, fast speed, sensitive reaction, high appearance, clear photos, high pixels, fast charging speed, and powerful flash charging. What do you think? If you have any good suggestions, please leave a message. The comparison of the two models is for reference only. Is it cost-effective?
