Can you believe that AI artificial intelligence actually killed humans? 29 scientists in Japanese laboratory were killed by four robots, and it is said that there were whistleblowers and informants who testified. Is this a rumor or is it true? Who should be responsible for the 29 people killed?
robot
"AI murder" incident
Everyone knows that Japan has always been controlled by the United States, so it cannot do anything nuclear weapon , but in the study of AI artificial intelligence robots, Japan has always been ahead of the world.
But how big is the ambition of the Japanese? No one knows whether the intelligent robot studied will be used for combat . After all, even if it is available, it is definitely highly confidential.
So when the news that 29 scientists in Japanese laboratory were killed by 4 robots was spread, many people still believed it, and of course more people expressed disbelief.
What's more, the person who broke the news was an American. Just 4 years ago, an American woman named Linda Moldon Howe mentioned the AI murder in a Japanese laboratory in a speech in Los Angeles.
Linda Moulton Howie
Anyway, it has a nose and eyes. According to this American woman, the Japanese military has been secretly researching it. can be used for combat intelligent AI robot .
has even successfully developed 4 units and stored them in a secret experimental base. As a result, one day, the four robots suddenly ran away, like they were caught in a demon, killing the scientists present in a crazy way, which eventually led to the brutal killing of 29 Japanese scientists. The base immediately sounded an alarm afterwards. The Japanese military immediately blocked the scene. The robot was made by humans. Although it has steel helmets and armor, it does not have the IQ of humans after all.
Intelligent AI robot that can be used for combat
Soon four robots were subdued by the Japanese military. In order to prevent accidents from happening again, they forced two of them, , to stop their actions .
has a man who was too cruel and was directly pulled to decompose and destroy by , while the last robot was very strange. Just when scientists decided to destroy it, this robot's magical achieved self-recovery .
If this is just an accident caused by a problem with the program, it is okay, but if it is really the autonomous behavior of the robot, it will be very terrible, which means that the robot may no longer be controlled by humans.
AI robot
However, no matter how you hear this, is it really possible to kill people in AI? Who is the American woman who broke the news in ? How credible is her words?
Later, someone dug up the information about this American woman and found that the video content and messages posted on the website founded by her were all about "Alien Life" and UFO.
can be said to be a fan of alien creatures. She also claims to have won awards on the research of "Alien Life" many times and has participated in many speeches on this content.
But this behavior itself is questionable, because the meetings she said were all civil organizations without any official organization endorsement.
Artificial intelligence
So the woman's remarks are worthy of question marks, and the informant in Howie's words are also questionable. According to what she said, this news was learned from a retired Marine Corps and a person with an .
But this so-called informant did not witness the AI killing with his own eyes, and it was also heard from others. When someone asked about the name of the informant and the approximate range of the secret base, Howie vaguely stated that it was inconvenient to disclose .
. Whether this matter is true or false, it has to worry about a question: Will AI intelligent robots really kill people? If this incident in the Japanese laboratory is true, then who should be responsible for the 29 scientists who died tragically?
Artificial intelligence
Who is responsible for killing people if artificial intelligence loses control?
29 scientists in Japanese laboratory were killed by four robots. If this matter is true, who should bear the responsibility? First of all, whether AI individuals are human is a very controversial issue. At present, some countries have recognized the legal identity of robots, but it should be noted that the identity here does not refer to possession, but the same identity as humans.
How to hold people accountable if AI kills people? Judging from the current situation, no country in the world has any relevant legislation. once Hawking has expressed concerns about artificial intelligence.
He believes that one day it would be terrible to let robots have human wisdom and thinking and the ability to think independently.
Artificial intelligence
Now with the development of human beings, AI AI artificial intelligence has spread all around us , such as our common home sweeping robots, robot "feeders" in restaurants, and robot "chefs" in the Beijing Winter Olympics , and robot "chefs" in the canteen, etc.
They are all of AI artificial intelligence, and in many cases it really makes our lives much more convenient. For example, robot assistants appearing in major banks can help solve customer problems when artificial intelligence is busy.
However, when one day, these robots suddenly went crazy and killed people, who should the families of the deceased seek to make sense? The laws in human society are established only for human behavioral norms.
means that only restricts and serves humans . If the current laws stipulate, robots are not a real "person", but just an "item".
Robot
If it is this logic, if the "item" makes a mistake or even leads to the murder, the first thing to look for is the "person" who invents and manufactures the item, that is, the developer and manufacturer of .
This is like your pet dog. If you bite a person or bite the other person’s pet to death, the first person the other party is to find must be you who keeps this pet dog.
Of course, the situation of artificial intelligence killing is different. There are two main problems involved, that is, which type of killing is AI intelligent robot? The first type is AI subjective killing that leads to human death .
Robots on the battlefield
The second type is that AI subjects are unwilling to kill people, but are controlled by people or accidentally caused human death . There is no legislation for AI artificial intelligence now.
So when AI is not an independent individual, a murder occurs, the existing law will determine that this is an active behavior of the developer, and the developer needs to be responsible for it.
If the AI is infected with a virus or an accident causes human death, the developer should bear joint and several liability, and the main responsibility must be traced back.
Now it seems that both Hawking and Musk have concerns about the prospects of artificial intelligence, which is not unreasonable. 29 people in Japanese labs were killed by robots. Although the truth remains to be investigated, it is worth our thinking. , not to mention that AI can indeed be used to kill people .
robot
AI intelligence horror
robots killed 29 people in Japanese laboratory? The truth and falsehood of the story are different, but it is certain that AI can really be used to kill people. No wonder Hawking thought that the artificial intelligence of the super neural network may be the last invention of human beings, because it means that human beings will eventually be destroyed by robots .Many people think this is alarmist because these situations will only happen in science fiction movies, but on the battlefield in Libya two years ago, humans had the first case in history, AI robots' autonomous murder , and it is the first robot murder that has been clearly recorded since human history.
suicide drone produced in Türkiye
At that time, a suicide drone produced in Türkiye suddenly walked away and shot and killed a soldier. Someone may stand up and oppose it. Since
is a suicide drone, it is originally used to kill people, but it should be known that even a drone used to kill people can eventually kill people.
is controlled by someone at the back and issued instructions to complete it. This is true for all machines. requires "people" to intervene and control .
But this drone in Turkey was an autonomous behavior that took place after thinking about it "self" without the control of any military personnel.
suicide drone produced in Turkey
This is very terrifying. Our in-depth research on artificial intelligence is to enable them to be realized and then used to create after self-learning. However, this machine is learning how to kill in . Isn’t this scary?
Just imagine, if a robot has the awareness of killing people and can even realize communication between machines, what will the world become?
When they had the idea of dominating the earth, the only thing that welcomed humans was the demise , and it was also very scary to apply AI to the battlefield in large quantities.
An Gulf War in the United States, , allowed the world to see the power of information warfare and the power of technology. So someone suggested that in the future, if robots are all fighting robots against robots, wouldn’t it reduce a large number of human casualties?
Gulf War
From this perspective, it is a good thing to put AI into the war, but what about the actual situation? The biggest difference between humans and robots is that robots lack complex and changeable emotions of humans. Robots do not have joy, anger, sorrow, and happiness, and do not have compassion and compassion.
So they are put into the battlefield in large quantities. They will not respect human life, will not think about their rationality, and will only kill the target person according to the procedure, even if the other party is just a child in a cradle or a pregnant mother.
because they do not understand sympathy, they will cause more innocent people to suffer. , which is the most terrifying killing of life, is the most terrifying . What's more important is that if these high-IQ robots fall into the hands of terrorists, they are likely to become their tools for killing.
Artificial intelligence
And it is the kind of top killing master. Even the most powerful special forces at that time, they may not be the opponent of these AI intelligent robots.
So the 29 scientists in Japanese laboratory were killed by 4 robots, whether true or false, is thought-provoking. In the future, how should we develop and apply AI artificial intelligence? This is indeed a question worth thinking about.
