Is Huawei’s statement not rigorous? Who are the people who publish this view? They are all talking about management thinking, equity, and corporate success studies, similar to Chen Chunhua.
interprets the meaning: How can a person who talks about Huawei all day long have nothing to do with Huawei? Don’t be too absolute. We still need to "continue studying Huawei". You are so cruel to ignore Chen Chunhua. Now that the relationship is clear, how can we continue to share our experiences and results of "researching Huawei" with the audience in the future? According to "conscience", "we" have not said anything bad about Huawei so far. Not only have we not said anything bad, but we have also praised it. Your statement is not only imprecise, but also unkind. It breaks the hearts of those of us who "research Huawei" or "continue to study Huawei".
So the question is, as a mature and large company, why would Huawei issue such an "improper" statement? Personal understanding:
Ren Zhengfei drove to pick up a female professor from Peking University despite the objections of senior management; having a fireside chat with Mr. Ren Zhengfei; Huawei military advisor and other hot topics are purely fiction!
Huawei has endured it for a long time. It is polite enough to say that "Huawei has nothing to do with Professor Chen Chunhua. Huawei does not understand her, and she cannot understand Huawei."
This matter will continue to ferment in the future, and more good people (self-media) will point the finger at Huawei. Since "praising" Huawei and "studying Huawei" cannot be achieved, all that is left is "hate"!
#huawei##陈春花##Huawei statement: has no relationship with Professor Chen Chunhua#
