At this moment, the anti-epidemic experts that we think of first are probably Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong, both of whom are the most famous anti-epidemic experts in China. If it weren't for the 2020 new coronavirus, many people might not know about Academician Zhong Nanshan.

After three years of epidemic attacks, at this moment the general clarion call for attack is finally going to sound.

At this moment, the anti-epidemic experts that we think of first are probably Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong. These two are the most famous anti-epidemic experts in China.

If it weren’t for the 2020 new coronavirus, many people might not know about Academician Zhong Nanshan.

In the past three years, Academician Zhong has been running day and night for the health of the country's 1.4 billion people. No matter how old he is, he will appear wherever he is needed.

It can be said that Mr. Zhong’s contribution is indispensable for China’s victory over the epidemic.

The status of Academician Zhong Nanshan in our minds is no less than that of Yuan Longping. We regard Academician Zhong Nanshan as our national treasure.

Zhang Wenhong had already emerged during the SARS epidemic in 2003 and became the main person in charge of the Shanghai Medical team.

But at that time, his mentor Professor Weng Xinhua was still there, and the focus of the anti-epidemic work was not in Shanghai, but in Guangdong.

Therefore, Zhang Wenhong's reputation is far behind that of Zhong Nanshan.

However, on January 29, Zhang Wenhong became famous because of his "hardcore" words.

For example, regarding the new coronavirus, ask him if there are any special medicines.

He said, "The best specific medicine is to make the patient's immune system . What we do is to help them get through it."

Zhang Wenhong also relied on this sentence, which quickly became popular and attracted a large number of fans.

Therefore, for a long time after this, he, like Zhong Nanshan, became a famous anti-epidemic expert in the country.

However, there are many celebrities, and Zhang Wenhong and Zhong Nanshan also suffered a lot of criticism after they became famous.

Sima Nan sarcastically said: "A certain famous doctor, a heroic man, eloquent, spoke like a fortune teller, made several mistakes in a row, and predicted the second half of the year yesterday..."

After a little research, I found out that the person he was ridiculing was none other than Zhong Nanshan!

Zhong Nanshan is not "fighting alone", Zhang Wenhong is also the one who was bombarded the most by Sima Nan!

Sima Nan seems to have a grudge against Zhang Wenhong, or in other words, he has strong opinions on Shanghai.

In March, Sima Nan started a crazy propaganda. He was very suspicious of the drugs promoted by Zhang Wenhong, and he was also very dissatisfied with the blockade in Shanghai. He was like an old woman looking at her daughter-in-law, and he didn't like everything. How could a "national treasure" like

become Adou in Sima Nan's words?

Recently, Principal Rao Yi publicly criticized Zhang Wenhong and Zhong Nanshan.

He believed that Zhang Wenhong's prediction was "pure rumors" and said: "No one can predict the future development now, and no one can guarantee that the epidemic will be eliminated forever. It happens three times a year, and each time it will happen irregularly."

He was talking about Zhang Wenhong's speech at the 2022 China-US International Microbiology ht Opinions expressed at the ml6 and Infectious Diseases Summit Forum: "We have emerged from this plague, and this situation will not change."

Rao Yi published a blog post of more than 3,000 words on his Weibo on December 19, titled "It is not necessary to show off to the superiors, but it is not appropriate to show off to the inferiors: Representatives from both sides of the epidemic should seek truth from facts."

As you can see from the title, this is a paper specifically targeted at Zhang Wenhong and Zhong Nanshan.

When it came to Lianhua Qingwen , he did not shy away and said straight to the point: "It has been two years and there has been no large-scale phase III, double-blind , randomized controlled clinical trial. Therefore, we still need more double-blind, controlled clinical trials. Clinical experiments were conducted to confirm the efficacy of Lianhua Qingwen. "

In his article, he named it a "fake medicine" and believed that it should not "under the banner of traditional Chinese medicine, damage the reputation of truly effective traditional Chinese medicine and affect truly effective traditional Chinese medicine."

Rao Yi wants to teach China's "experts" a profound lesson, that is: science is a rigorous science, and if you don't understand, don't pretend to be.

Rao Yi is really bold and dares to say anything.

To be honest, I despise this approach. If they can bombard those two doctors in 2020, I think they will be consistent heroes.

Buffett once said:

h. tml0Only when the tide goes out can you discover who is swimming naked.

I don’t want to “deify” doctors in this battle.

Because I know:

The reason why they choose to be doctors is just to help more people.

This battle will probably last for a long time.

But precisely because we have met more good doctors, such as Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong,

we ordinary people have become more confident and brave. Dare.

Let’s take a look at what netizens think of Academician Zhong Nanshan?

Brazilian netizen Nemali: China's anti-epidemic expert is really great. He has saved more lives. It is China's pride to have such an expert. In the process of China's fight against the disease, especially in the early stages of the outbreak, we simply cannot believe that China has such courage to prevent the spread of the epidemic and prevent the people from being infected. We give a thumbs up to China's great experts.

United States Netizen Dasatigue: What I admire most is Zhong Nanshan. China has such a responsible expert. I wish China, especially after China opens up, that China will become even better.

Watching netizens from other countries praise our country’s epidemic prevention measures, I suddenly felt how lucky we are to have been protected by the government for three years.

However, some people are really hypocritical. They have obviously received the protection of others, but they are not grateful at all. Instead, they complain here. Are others uneducated and have no vision?

However, science is science. Rao Yi's words may not necessarily be correct, but this does not mean that he is not qualified to question it.

Academician Zhong Nanshan, Dr. Zhang Wenhong and others have made great contributions in the fight against the epidemic. Their achievements are undeniable, but they will also be doubted.

Reason cannot explain, science requires debate, and only in the conflict of fire and light can valuable ideas emerge.

Therefore, I make a conciliatory proposal to them.

Principal Rao Yi doesn’t need to be sarcastic about this matter, nor does he need to worry too much, let alone firing guns everywhere and making enemies everywhere, especially don’t build the turret in front of Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong’s house, and bombard two medical masters with artillery fire.

For the sake of the lives and health of the people, they poured their blood and sweat into them.

To be honest, I trust doctors more than those so-called scientists.

Many people will say, I am from China; I am proud to be a Chinese, but now, the Internet is full of voices of freedom. What you say about patriotism is just empty talk?

People abroad are envious of our three-year blockade. Only we know how much the country has paid to us in these three years.

hopes that this time, everyone can get through it smoothly.

In addition, Hu Xijin posted the results of his on-the-spot inspection at the Beijing 120 Emergency Center on social platforms. He believed that Beijing is in a state of "everyone is in danger."

But Lao Hu’s remarks also show that he is optimistic about the development prospects of the epidemic.

1. The toxicity and mortality rate of the virus are already very low;

2. Mutual assistance among relatives and friends can alleviate the pressure of temporary drug shortages;

3. Beijing is the "epicenter" nationwide, and this epidemic peak will also mark a turning point in the nationwide epidemic.

In fact, both Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong believe that this is a high-risk infectious disease.

Currently, Chinese students abroad need to know more about the domestic epidemic situation in order to provide an important basis for their return plan.

Those who criticize Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong, and those who advocate them in 2020, are usually the same people.

However, the most rare thing about Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong is that you praise them and they are treating diseases and saving people, but you scold them and they are still treating diseases and saving people.

So, if there is any emergency about the epidemic, would you believe Zhong Nanshan and Zhang Wenhong, or would you believe Sima Nan and Rao Yi?

Or do you hope that Rao Yi, like Sima Nan, will post articles to treat people's illnesses?

The answer is self-evident.

Finally, let’s take Yu Hongmin’s evaluation of Zhang Wenhong to see what kind of people they are?

Do you suggest they reconcile?

Welcome everyone to express your views in the comment area below. Welcome to forward and share so that more people can see your views!