The American NASA is questioned again. The reason for this time is that A rut is printed on . Recently, an overseas netizen posted on social platforms saying, why did the American lunar rover not leave ruts after driving, while the Chinese lunar rover leaves ruts?
According to the comparison chart of the two, the situation between the two is very obvious. Our lunar rover left two deeper ruts after driving, but the American lunar rover left no trace after driving. What's going on? Because the comparison between the two is very obvious, many netizens have also questioned NASA.
Although this netizen did not directly question NASA, his tone was already very obvious, just a tone with doubts.
Regarding the author's doubts, some netizens said that NASA's lunar rover may not be loaded with much, so the traces of ruts are not obvious. also said that it might be windy at that time, and all ruts disappeared with the wind.
You can see that after passing through several different perspectives, although some traces appeared behind the rover, there were still no ruts on the surface of the moon. What's going on?
In fact, NASA's lunar rover is not without traces of ruts, is a problem of shooting angle . I believe everyone knows that one angle can determine the quality and truth of the photo.
can be seen, this photo seems to be very obvious. When we look into the distance, we will find that NASA's lunar rover does leave some traces of passing. Although it is still not very obvious, you can probably see traces of ruts passing by the moon at . The reason why this netizen questioned may be because of the photo selection problem. In addition, the traces of our lunar rover ruts contrast with NASA's lunar rover photos, so this netizen posted with a questioning attitude.
Because the two are in a comparison, a big shot also reposted the post, but Xue Jian did not post any ideas, just retweeted it.
What do you think about this question?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-