A doctor believes that COVID-19 is a marathon knockout race, and most people will survive, but no one can guarantee that they are not the one who was eliminated. He calls on those with conditions to protect themselves as much as possible and strive to enter later. Is this really the case?
He listed the following sequelae that may be caused by the new crown. These possibilities are mainly based on some current research conclusions. In fact, these conclusions are all possibilities. So far, the virus is still constantly mutating and evolving, and scientists still have limited understanding of the true picture of the new crown.
1. You can catch Covid multiple times. (The new coronavirus can be infected many times)
2. Reinfections are common, not rare. (Repeated infection is a common phenomenon, not an isolated case)
3. Breakthrough infections are common. (The new coronavirus can kill you months after you recover. (The new coronavirus can kill you months after you recover.)
5.lt can cause brain damaqe. (The new coronavirus can cause brain damage)
6. It can cause blood clots and heart attacks.(The new crown can cause blood clots, causing heart disease and damage)
7. It doesn't spare children.(It won't let the child go)
8. Vaccines help, but only some.( vaccine has effect, but limited)
9.Masks work.(Masks are effective)I think this is a conclusion with certain scientific connotations. The epidemic has lasted for three years. At present, most regions abroad have already ended and have completely abandoned the epidemic prevention policy. We are still adhering to the people-oriented epidemic prevention concept. If we want to end in the future, it is correct to protect ourselves and strive to end later before fully understanding the harm and sequelae of the new crown.
First point: Is there any evidence for the sequelae of the new crown?
There are many different opinions on the sequelae of the new crown, and scientists have not made any conclusions. Some people say that everything needs to be based on evidence and cannot be heard from. This is true. However, speaking evidence in the face of unknown things requires the test of samples and time.
The mainstream view of scientists is: There is no evidence that the new crown will lead to a series of sequelae. But again, there is no evidence that the new crown will not cause sequelae. It is always right to be vigilant in the face of unknown things, otherwise why should we spend so much effort to guard against it?
About the destructive nature of the new crown. In fact, there is no clear definite theory. Some say it is the large flu, and the pain will pass in a few days; some say it is the small AIDS that destroys the immune system and lung function. But the new coronavirus does have repeated infections, which may cause the immune system to collapse and lead to organ failure. There have been cases in foreign countries.
Second point: Is herd immunity reliable?
The answer must be unreliable. The new coronavirus is still mutating and has been proven to be reinfected. Just imagine, if you get infected every three or four months, will your immune system still have time to continue to repair?
"Thousands of sails pass by the sunken boat, and thousands of trees are springing in front of the sick tree." The new coronavirus will eventually disappear, and there can only be two directions of disappearance. One is that it mutates irreversibly into an ordinary virus with weak pathogenicity and will no longer be strengthened. The second is to develop highly targeted drugs or vaccines.
Third point: Is the new crown a natural product or a test product?
Currently the mainstream view is a natural product, but Russian research believes that it may be a product of the laboratory. This may always be a secret.
Three years have passed. Where did the new crown come from? This question is still unknown. There is no clear evidence to prove it. The following statements are all guesses:
Some people say: The probability of the new crown virus coming from nature is one in 300 million.
There are also studies that believe that there is a gene fragment in the new coronavirus that is almost impossible to produce in nature. The United States was testing the new crown vaccine as early as June 2019. As for Barrick's invention, Fort Decreck continues to research, etc., it is only speculation at present.The key question of
is: Is it an infection event or a chain of condoms? Is the so-called herd immunity over or beginning?
Will the high infectivity of the new coronavirus change the genetic gene ? No research can tell us whether this is a physical problem of one generation or a physical problem of several generations.
American disease control expert Fauci said that it (the new crown) will find each of us, so taking every precautionary measures, trying to avoid infection and delay infection is something that we the general public can do.
can only last until the end, and those who are ahead are stepping stones. Everyone must be the first person responsible for their own health.
If everyone can't escape, then take good protection and enter as late as possible.
is late, the mask is valid.
Do a good job in personal hygiene protection and reduce the frequency of infection.
In short, it is correct to listen to the country's right. The country's research in this regard is comprehensive, and the strategies formulated are most in line with the fundamental interests of the broad masses of people.
People's Daily Zhongyin: Work together to resolutely build a solid barrier to epidemic prevention and control.
State Council Joint Prevention and Control Mechanism Press Conference: Implement prevention and control measures in detail and effectively deal with the epidemic.
Follow the country's footsteps. When it comes to vaccination, precise prevention and control, precise prevention and control are precise prevention and control. Every country's epidemic prevention strategy is a decision made through scientific research. It is better to respect science than to hear.
