This problem is actually no longer a simple medical problem, but a social problem. Under normal logic, if a patient does colonoscopy, in addition to excluding intestinal cancer, he will find polyps and remove the root cause of the precancerous lesion , so he will not get cancer in the future.
So if the polyps can be removed during colonoscopy , at least the patient can take less laxatives and receive less colonoscopy. Isn’t this good? But the problem is not that simple, because there are two problems hidden in the process of removing intestinal polyps .
The first is treatment risks. Doctors will definitely follow up the corresponding safety measures when doing treatment, but after all, it is treatment, and there are always corresponding complications such as bleeding, perforation, etc. If you turn all the responsibility on the doctor, I am afraid you can't afford it.
The second is the cost issue, and treatment will incur treatment costs ranging from hundreds to thousands. In public hospitals, we will definitely charge according to the rules, and there are rarely any random charges, but some patients, no matter how much money we charge, feel that we are allowing them to transition to consumption and have a crisis of trust.
My first medical complaint when I was young was related to this matter. The patient came for a colonoscopy and found a polyp. Since the patient was awake, I asked him if he needed treatment. The patient said it was okay and everything was listened to you. The entire treatment cost was 3,000, which was covered by medical insurance. However, after the treatment, the patient refused to pay and kept complaining. The reason for the complaint was only because his psychological price was 2,000, which of course was invalid. Finally, let’s summarize. During the colonoscopy, the doctor has no obligation to give you any easy treatment. If you hope or the doctor is willing to do treatment for you, please make a statement in advance and express your gratitude and pay for it.
