A fan overwhelmed the Internet to claim to "anti-network violence", but it has always been thunder and not raining. Instead, Xu Min's anti-network violence lawsuits have been arranged one after another.

Anti-error "Xu Min steals children" is a frame-up of public opinion, and anti-error "Xu Min's online violence" is also a frame-up of public opinion. Du spent two days to sue Xu Min for online violence, but no case was filed yet. A fan overwhelmed the Internet claiming to "anti-network violence" and has always been thunder and not raining. Instead, Xu Min's anti-network violence lawsuits have been arranged one after another.

Maybe there are always some people who want to "what I say is what I say", but we always believe that now is no longer the era for some people to "what I say is what I say".

Countless facts have proved that there is no way out for "thieves shouting to catch thieves", and "we are not afraid of being in a straight body but not being afraid of being in a wrong way" is the confidence. It is impossible to lead any rhythm by relying on the crime of wanting to be added or by framed by public opinion. Nowadays, netizens also have the wisdom of their own independent judgment, and it is not so easy to lead the wrong way.

Even if you use a magnifying glass, you can't find any reason for "Xu Min's Internet Breaking".

1. Xu Min did not make any violent remarks online and offline. has issued a brief statement and raised 11 questions, but Xu Min has hardly written a short essay about 28, has not commented on or told any plot of 28 on any video platform or offline public, let alone "network violence". Those who say "online violence" with their eyes closed, have you ever seen Xu Min's words, even a picture? Compared to some people who often write short essays and do live broadcasts, Xu Min's words and deeds on the Internet can be said to be as low as possible. He didn’t even speak online. At what time and through what channels did Xu Min carry out the “network violence”?

2. Reasonable doubt is Xu Min's legitimate right, and Xu Min did not name accusing who secretly changed the child. The child I have worked hard to raise for 28 years is not the biological child. The child of my own child has inexplicably become the child of someone else's family. Anyone else must find out the truth and investigate the responsible person. On the issue of wrong change and stolen change, Xu Min only doubted that "it was impossible to change wrongly without artificiality". He never pointed out the name and said who changed the child (a party instead pointed out the name and publicly said that "Xu Min stole our 9-point child"). Moreover, the analysis of "mism can't be achieved without artificial intelligence" was not made by Xu Min, but by Li Sheng lawyers. The pharmacy also expressed similar meaning before lawyer Li.

Step back and say that even if Xu Min said this, it has nothing to do with "network violence". Because it was just expressing doubts, not pointing to anyone, it was someone who took the role by himself and thought Xu Min was just talking about her. Just like someone said that his 300 taels of silver had been stolen, you quickly say, "A Er did not steal it next door." No one said you, you think you are talking about you, what kind of "network violence" is this? On the contrary, why you are so sensitive may need to explain the reasons.

3. Netizens' spontaneous and conscious discussions and doubts were not organized by Xu Min, and no one could organize them. is based on the attention to public events and the many suspicious points of the 28 incidents. Netizens across the country consciously speak out, question, express their positions, and support them. It is not inappropriate in itself, and it is not within the controllable scope of Xu Min. In fact, there is no evidence to prove that "Xu Min organizes hundreds of millions of people to breach online", and Xu Min cannot have such ability - to organize hundreds of millions of people to breach online, it is necessary to have strong financial and human support, and a strong command center and organizational system. Even ten bins cannot do it, let alone Xu Min, who is a mere wage earner, has a high debt, has no place to live, and is busy chasing the truth every day. Therefore, all the remarks that "netizens across the country questioned a certain party" were counted on Xu Min's head. He thought with his toes and thought that it was a crime to be accused of, and he was talking lies with his eyes open.

. Relatively speaking, most of the netizens who support Xu Min’s speeches are gentle, well-known, and objective (there is no rule out that a few fake supporters have some extreme remarks), while netizens who support a certain party often speak sharply, speak nonsense, and speak ill of malice. There is almost no lower limit on rumor, slander, threats and insults of Xu Min and his family. Various information on supporting Du Qun and sub-venues are flooding the entire network. Du even provided direct financial support to some loyal fans. Under this circumstance, Xu Min did not sue Du for "organizing cyber violence", but Du instead sued Xu Min for "organizing cyber violence". This is really outrageous.Unfortunately, now is not an era of speaking with the right to speak "whoever sues is right", but everything has to be spoken with evidence.

4. Netizens spontaneously rushed to the venue to support Xu Min is a legal act, and it is not Xu Min's organization. During the two meetings of , many netizens spontaneously rushed to the venue to support Xu Ma. Compared to the supporters of a certain party who can sit in the branch venue and blow the air conditioner, Xu Ma's supporters are standing in the venue in the wind and rain, waiting quickly. It neither impacted the venue nor hindered traffic, nor affected order, otherwise it would have been stopped by J.

In addition to expressing gratitude to supporters, Xu Ma did not lead them to the roadshow, nor did she pay them a salary and travel fee. At best, it only responded to the ancient saying of "Get the truth and help more", reflecting Xu Ma's personality charm. What kind of "network violence" is this?

So, if someone insists on saying Xu Min is brutal, please provide evidence. If there is no evidence, just touching your upper and lower lips, please shut up immediately. If you have no evidence and you have to falsely accuse Xu Min of online violence everywhere, Xu Min’s team may ask you to collect tickets.

The Internet is not a lawless place, and freedom of speech is not without boundaries. Everyone must be responsible for their words and deeds, which is the basic principle and the bottom line of being a human being. Anyone who is not in a position of law or violates the law will definitely pay the price.

Copyright Statement: The author Ruoshui Sanqian is a national second-level psychological counselor in , and a senior educator. This article is an original article from Ruoshui Sanqian and is exclusively authorized to be released for the first time in Toutiao. Netizens are welcome to forward. Reproduction may not be made without consent.

Wish Xu Ma's family get rid of the haze and return to the track of happiness as soon as possible