People like Zhang Wenhong are indeed very controversial. Now every time there is a video where he appears, there are a lot of comments underneath. I don’t want to see this person. Why are everyone so disgusted with him now. Some netizens at
summed it up. Others may only be attacked by a certain faction, but now Zhang Wenhong is attacked by any faction. Why is this?
Let’s take a look at Zhang Wenhong’s previous views
. As early as February 2020, when the epidemic broke out, he once said, “It is believed that the Wuhan pneumonia virus emerged from Wuhan and was not introduced from abroad.”
. In April 2020, he made it clear that the full name nucleic acid can only represent whether there is an infection now, and there is a risk of false negatives. It is impossible to screen out all infected people.
. In July 2020, he said, "In fact, the epidemic in China is over, and all drugs and vaccines being manufactured now are made for the future."
4. In July 2021, when the epidemic reappeared in some parts of the country, he said that the epidemic would not end in the short term, and it might not end in the long term. We must learn to coexist with the virus.
5. In August 2021, he expressed his opinion that if you get infected after vaccination, you basically don’t need to be hospitalized, which is similar to the situation with influenza.
6. In the last month of 2021, he also said that this will be our last cold winter, and the clouds and fog will eventually clear up and the sun will shine.
7. In March 2022, an epidemic broke out in Shanghai. He also said that if the cold winter has not passed yet, it is better to say that this is a late spring cold.
Later, he stated many times that the new coronavirus is actually not that terrible. Although it will not end in the short term, we need more patience. Just in December 2022, he said that it is a foregone conclusion that we will be out of this epidemic, and this trend will not be reversed. Including many people saying that he once said that 98% of those infected now are asymptomatic infections
Regarding his words, to be honest, there were many swings in the past, so now many people sneer at him,
The lying faction attacked him
The reason why these people attacked him was simply that he had long been calling on everyone to coexist with the virus for a long time. Then these people found various reasons to say that Zhang Wenhong was involved in personal affairs
1 and believed that he had no regard for the lives of the people.
2. He is a lackey of the West, serving as a platform for Pfizer .
3. His suggestion that this is a major flu is completely unfounded. Including Rao Yi and Da v Sima Nan are also criticizing Zhang Wenhong for not being knowledgeable enough. No one in the world today can judge the direction of the epidemic, and no one can rule out that the epidemic will always be with mankind. Three times a year, each time the severity swings irregularly. What Zhang Wenhong said are all rumors.
It stands to reason that it is normal for the liberal faction to attack him and the flat faction to attack him. After all, the views are different. Zhang’s views have always been in favor of liberalization, including what he once said in 2022. The number of people infected every day in the United States is thousands of times that of ours, but people still live a good life. It is precisely because of these views represented by
that many people believe that such viruses are really nothing, and they doubt whether we are too nervous. There is really no need to spend a lot of manpower, material and financial resources like we are now. After all, foreign countries have liberalized the virus earlier than us, and it is not that serious.
But after the epidemic was really relaxed and it hit them, they realized that some things were not as simple as the experts said:
Because after the epidemic was liberalized, everyone was generally infected. One problem he discovered is that as long as people around him are positive, they will have symptoms, and some are quite painful, so his theory that 98% are asymptomatic is a rumor.
Zhang Wenhong brought disaster to the country and the people.
Zhang Wenhong’s death is not enough for the people to be angry.
He was scolded with all kinds of vicious words, and for a while he became the target of public insults.
Is Zhang Wenhong wrong?
Some netizens dug up what Zhang had said before, including his paper. Although he did say a lot of things, which are now proven to be inconsistent with the reality, they were based on the current situation at the time. In fact, you can't tell right from wrong. Especially for
's conclusion of 98% asymptomatic infections, many people say it is fabricated. Looking through his paper, I found that he only said that the proportion of fever was 4%, and the final conclusion given in the original text is: conducted a follow-up study on 33,816 patients and found that the asymptomatic proportion in the risk group was 76.2%, while the asymptomatic proportion in the non-risk group was 78.6%.
Of course, even this 4% statement is unrealistic in the current situation. Many people say that his paper must be fake, but what I want to say is that this paper was researched by more than a dozen people in his team, not by him alone, and the background of the research is based on the analysis of the epidemic situation in Shanghai in the first half of the year. It may not be consistent with the current situation, but you can't just say that he is lying to everyone.
After all, the situation at that time was completely different from the full liberalization now. Moreover, we had just been vaccinated at that time. Experts also said that the optimal protection time of the vaccine is about 6 months, so we don’t know whether the situation at that time and the current situation are also related to this vaccine. In the end, things are developing. We can use the current situation to overturn his previous research, but we cannot slander him as a fraud or a lie.
Including whether we should use Pfizer drugs, some people pointed out that he has personal selfish interests. In fact, I think that as a doctor, treating diseases and saving people is his most essential job. How can it be a mistake to introduce a drug that is beneficial to people's conditions?
The current public opinion is that as long as you recommend Western medicine, you are doing something private and with bad intentions. Do you have to recommend domestic medicine? Besides, Pfizer at least has clinical experience. We support that Western medicine and Chinese medicine are not inconsistent. Whichever one is more effective, we will choose which one. If you think it is not effective, you can refuse to use it, but please give others a chance to choose.
When many people questioned him, many media could not stand it;
A well-known celebrity pointed out that he had a big problem
, the big v, did not give a specific reason. When replying to the netizen's question, he told the truth, that is, his problem is still relatively big. He feels that everyone hates this person. It is not a matter of stance, but that his remarks are not rigorous. In addition, it has been exposed many times that he has personal academic problems.
The last thing I want to say is that although I support any decision made by the country, for doctors like Zhang Wenhong, there are indeed many times where his words are contradictory. I believe he is a purely academic person. Yes, but I don’t want him to speak out often and express his views, because many of what he said later turned out to be inconsistent with the facts, which could easily mislead the public. I have no objections to him. I just feel that talking too much will lead to mistakes, so it’s better to show less publicity and do your job well.
Netizens, what do you think?
