Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th

2025/10/1504:13:35 news 1836

It was originally a very simple case. From the beginning, we sympathized with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, to the big Vs showing the qualifications of Bao Qingtian of Kaifeng Mansion to the local officials, to Yang Zhi's sympathy for the Liu family, who sold the knife. In just half a month, four historical figures took turns. I think it's time for us to reflect.

Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th - DayDayNews

Qixian Ye Ting’s incident, the Ye family expressed its appeal through public opinion. Under the pressure of public opinion from a group of big Vs and news accounts, the official finally made some details public. The details of were made public, but in exchange for the anti-Ye family, the Ye family was bullied by the Internet and shunned by the local society, which ultimately resulted in the consequences that the Ye family did not want.

Of course, this is not the result that the netizens who initially sympathized with the Ye family wanted to see! This is the main reason why in many cases, even if all the evidence has been closed, the details are not made public. It is also the reason why some mainstream media are afraid that public opinion will guide the outcome of the case and do not intervene in the ongoing cases; However, has also become one of those news influencers and commentators who are raking in traffic. They take advantage of netizens' cognitive deviations about legal principles and the time lag between the official notice and the need to collect evidence. They ask the official three questions and one request. Finally, they come up with a seemingly righteous persona of why the public doesn't buy it. They use traffic to guide public opinion!

Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th - DayDayNews

As a result of the first-instance judgment, one of the Liu family members was sentenced to life imprisonment and the other to 8 years. What the Ye family received was a compensation of 120,000 yuan, and the cyber violence against the Ye family and their deceased father. After the heat has passed, those news influencers who questioned the official and sought the truth have gathered a wave of traffic and are now rushing to catch up with the next wave of traffic; the people who were clamoring for positive energy and fairness and justice have also left one after another; only three broken families are left, and a result that no one wants.

remembers that Ye Ting’s phone recording asked “How should I explain to the netizens?” and she ended up getting a bad explanation. The masters who provided advice to the Ye family from all walks of life eventually became the talk of others after dinner, and this incident will eventually become a negative case of using the Internet to express demands. What I can see is that this is not the result that the Ye family wants. On the contrary, the more trouble there is, the more the government wants to show fairness and justice. 120,000 yuan in compensation, being bullied by the Internet, and being shunned by the local society. In addition to father's treatment and funeral expenses, where should the Ye family go in the future? Examples like

Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th - DayDayNews

often appear in our society. The fairness we pursue: one is legal fairness under various evidences, that is, an indefinite period, an 8-year period, and then a compensation of 120,000, which is fair and without temperature. The other is to combine the needs of the current situation of all parties and the fairness of human morality. Under the official mediation, the Liu family will pay more compensation to strive for a reduced sentence for the Liu family, and at the same time, it will also prevent the Ye family from losing a pillar in their future life and becoming poorer. These two kinds of fairness are sometimes contradictory. You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you pay more, the penalty will be lighter. If you want the penalty to be lighter, you should pay more. I believe rational people support the latter.

In the past year or so, there must have been lawyers and relevant personnel who have told the Ye family that both parties should make concessions. Maybe someone told the Ye family, "Don't make a fuss. It will be judged in the end, and it won't be good for anyone in the family." However, some people mistook this kind of mediation as the official being bribed by the Liu family and went to the Ye family to say good things, or that the Ye family threatened them and protected the suspects. So they continue to make trouble, want to win more, and push the matter online for public scrutiny. But how many of those so-called news influencers can look at this issue rationally? It is just a tool for them to gain traffic in the name of justice. The result is that under the supervision of public opinion, it will eventually turn into what the public thinks is fair and just, but this has no flexibility and cannot make you open your mouth. The Ye family has obviously lost an opportunity to fight for more compensation.But I think this case will eventually return to fairness and justice from a human standpoint, that is, the last mediation from a legal perspective before the second trial!

Although I am also a melon-eater, I feel more strongly about what the Ye family needs most? There are so many children in the family that need to be raised, and the Ye family sisters also have to start a family and start a business. But the family situation is not very good. The death of my father is indeed very sad, and it also caused the Ye family to lose a huge source of income. I hope that the Ye family will receive more compensation. At the same time, the Liu family is the same. The family is not rich either. One life is indefinite and the other is eight years. This result is very regrettable. I hope that under the supervision of Qixian officials, we can do our best to mediate with the Ye family, strive for understanding, and reduce the sentence, so that we can regain our freedom as soon as possible. After all, we are still young, there are still many days to come, and there are plenty of opportunities!

Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th - DayDayNews

Finally, the question of whether Ye Ting will be convicted of seeking punishment and causing trouble may disappoint some people. We can still believe in Qixian County officials, although this farce has caused many people to bear the pressure of being questioned. But the results came out, and a lot of evidence confirmed Ye Ting's misconduct. But I can also feel that the local officials will definitely watch what happened to the Ye family. In line with the stance of humane care and humanitarian assistance, they should not file a lawsuit against Ye, at least not a criminal lawsuit.

This is not what a lawyer on the Internet said. He contacted the Ye family and then, based on the legal provisions, brazenly said that it was not enough to seek punishment and cause trouble. It's obvious that you just listened to what one family member said and didn't see any official evidence. I also want to tell lawyers like this: Don’t use the official humanitarian concern for the Ye family as your standard for interpreting legal provisions in the future. Not suing doesn’t mean it’s not established. You will only lead your fans into the ditch.

Originally a very simple case, we began to sympathize with Diao'e's injustice, triggering unfounded and worrying reflections, then the big Vs showed the qualifications of Kaifeng Mansion Bao Qingtian to the local officials, and then Yang Zhi, the knife seller, sympathized with th - DayDayNews

also hopes that what netizens can really learn from this case? We must believe in the official fairness and justice in the end, which is based on the ruthlessness of the law and the care of humanity. We don’t want the Ye family to be hurt three times again after losing their father and being bullied by the Internet because of the inaccurate content of their essays. If we blindly use public opinion and demand that the authorities uphold the fairness and justice of the law, Ye Ting will inevitably face criminal penalties for provoking trouble. If that really happens, what will happen to the future of so many children in the Ye family? There will be severe restrictions on entering politics, going to school, joining the army, and taking civil service examinations! I hope that the Qixian County officials will stand on the side of humane support and not prosecute the Ye family or give a simple civil penalty as a token. This is what a rational person wants to see. I believe this is also the original intention of all officials to exercise credibility !

news Category Latest News