A very important object stipulated in the last twenty articles is called "over-epidemic prevention". Does "over-epidemic prevention" exist? Exist, such as a county town that suddenly gave you three days of silence without the epidemic, such as a place where you suddenly had a nucleic acid screen the next day when the nucleic acid company was established yesterday, such as a place where you suddenly had a large nucleic acid screen, such as a place where you were randomly assigned red codes.
But in most cases, the problem of excessive epidemic prevention does not actually exist, it is a strategic upgrade carried out by the government to clear the zero. From 2020 to 2021, we have never heard of the discussion of "over-epidemic prevention", which is that it has only begun to increase since Omickron. What is the reason? Is the government trying to block it? More because the scope of blockade caused by the strong contagion of Omickron had to be expanded, so that the society was too difficult.
Does the government want to block it casually? I don’t expect that for most governments, blockade means huge resource consumption and economic losses, which will ultimately destroy the fiscal and tax base and lead to huge problems. The entire nucleic acid testing -transport-isolation system has also greatly aggravated the workload of grassroots units, especially the problem of insufficient staff caused by large-scale blockade is becoming more and more serious. These are huge tests.
so it can not be blocked, and the government does not want to block it at all in most cases. No government thinks that it is okay and can't get along with money. So, the bigger the city, the less you want it. In most cases, "over-epidemic prevention" is actually a false proposition.
Some people say, why is it so messy now? Because indeed, many people are being tossed very hard, especially under the super long lockdown, there is no income, and such an impact is indeed endless. Similarly, local government resources under the super-long lockdown have been exhausted and cannot control them. Many areas that originally had rules have become unstructured because there is no resources to support them. We have seen some nucleic acid results have problems. The key is not the nucleic acid itself, but the failure of the previous effective control methods. This is a very typical systemic crisis, and these are the core backgrounds for the introduction of the Twenty Articles.
Many people have forgotten that the government and the people are on the same boat, and not many people want to block the ban at will.
However, the ultra-long lockdown is essentially a systemic crisis after insufficient resources, rather than the so-called "over-epidemic prevention", which is a manifestation of no additional resources to deal with new cases. Now that the epidemic is everywhere, there is no longer enough mobility in the country to complete support. Without the central government's decision, there is indeed no place to dare to let go of the flow when hundreds of new additions are added.
However, if the epidemic has not reached such a level, then there is still plenty of effort to exterminate the epidemic. The optimal strategy is still to discover and exterminate it in the early stage.
From the cities that have been reopened, the impact of the Omickron epidemic on the medical system is still very serious. There are many hospitals in Shijiazhuang that have to stop treatment, and the scale of medical and nursing infection is not low. Lanzhou, which has just been released, is also stepping up preparations for ordinary hospitals to receive positive diagnosis. Even some nurses in the late stage of pregnancy have to go on duty, and new ordinary patients are basically not allowed to receive treatment. Is this really optimistic?
Some people say what has been done for three years of the epidemic. China's medical resources have expanded a lot in the three years of the epidemic, but this is still far from enough. The core is still short of people. It can be imagined that if a critical care physician and nurse are trained in three years, you should first ask yourself if you dare to let them decide your destiny.
So, I personally despise those intellectuals who work from home without affecting their income, but often promote legal publicity to community staff and think they are "pleading for the people". Typically, it is Beijing where intellectuals gather. The Beijing Municipal Government should want to expand the scope of lockdown to reduce the growth of infection, so as to give new cabins time to build. However, this was boycotted by many "just" citizens last weekend. Yes, you are following laws and regulations, but the freedom you get from your behavior is aggravating the tension of medical resources, increasing the burden on front-line personnel, and may even kill some elderly people, basic patients, and chronic patients who were already saved.
is essentially selfishness covered by knowledge. Their smugness is just an overflow of ignorance.
If you have no income due to prevention and control, then I support you to unblock as much as possible. It is not easy to make money and no one wants to lose food. But if you can work from home, your income will not affect it, just don’t want to be blocked, I think this cannot be considered a hard work, you should help those front-line personnel bear it. Only by sharing the burden can we achieve reasonable social results.
Think about doctors who are repeatedly infected with high-intensity work, nurses who have to take risks with their big belly, service staff and volunteers who clean the toilets of thousands of people, workers who are racing against time to build the cabin, staff who are conducting the epidemic investigation day and night, staff who are coordinating and dispatching the transfer late at night, and volunteers who are repeatedly going up and downstairs. What are you pretending to be a middle class who stays at home for a week?
Put away your cheap emotions and cooperate more.
