When I was a child, my teacher often told us that what you really proved that you will learn from one example and apply it to others. It sounds easy, just like physics, I understand everything in class, but I get it wrong as soon as I do the questions, which still means I haven't

2025/06/2521:30:36 news 1324

When I was a child, the teacher often told us that what you really prove that you will learn to learn is to learn from one example. It sounds easy, just like physics, I understand everything in class, but I get it wrong as soon as I do the questions, which still means I haven't learned it. It is not easy to learn from one example. Li Jiaozun’s experience in Chaos course can give us some inspiration.

Idiom. It means that you can infer other things by giving an example. A metaphor is good at analogy and to understand the same. From " Analects of Confucius·Shuerpian ".

Li Jiaoshou gave several lessons in chaos, and the most impressed thing was the course on marketing: cracking the password for consumer needs. We often see a variety of marketing activities of merchants, including offline promotions, online discounts, traffic, and value creation. Then the few are truly transformed into growth. Why? Because it is ultimately a matter of demand.

When I was a child, my teacher often told us that what you really proved that you will learn from one example and apply it to others. It sounds easy, just like physics, I understand everything in class, but I get it wrong as soon as I do the questions, which still means I haven't - DayDayNews

solves the needs and starts from these three aspects. The inspiration that Li Jiaoshou's course gave me is that we must first find the essence of things, summarize it into a paradigm, and apply it to others within this paradigm.

and teacher Caitou learned from it and learned from it in the end it also said that he is actually Bacon's induction. Summarize a certain pattern through experience, then find positive cases to strengthen it, find negative cases to verify the boundaries of the usage of the pattern, and use dilemma cases to make this pattern more accurate.

My current understanding of learning from one example is that first of all, you must have solid experience and foundation, and then you must have a system and a paradigm, not just seeing trees but not forests. Then use deduction method to propose a hypothesis based on your experience, and then use the necessary conditions to infer to see if you can achieve the goal you want. If possible, start verification and continuously iterate your ideas during the verification process.

This is very important to learn from one example and apply it to others, which is the boundaries and limitations of the paradigm. Just as Charlie Munger said in , you need to master the basic theories of basic disciplines, and their scope of application is different. Don’t look at the nail and look for a hammer. In different scenarios, we need to apply it in detail based on different paradigms. And this is wisdom.

Learn from one example and it is easy for some people to learn from, because they have already made it clear in their field. As long as they are not bound to their own self-righteousness, they can quickly find the problem and propose different solutions. In the end, all they need to do is to choose the right one among the good solutions. Moreover, people with high-level perspectives have a broader horizon. They can discover the same essence of things from different fields, and thus use the same paradigm to solve problems in different fields.

But it is not easy for me to learn from one example. I found that my current problem is that I am entangled in trivialities and have not summarized these summary to the theoretical level. Practice is practice, and I can only learn from one example, and I cannot learn from it. The summary and rise afterwards still need to be strengthened.
has another problem, is that it is not enough to grasp the essence of things, and cannot see through the appearance of the industry. Sometimes, knowing that these are illusions and still don’t know the solution. This can only be changed through more learning and practice. Sometimes it is like practicing, and you need to understand it. The final problem of
is the hammer effect. Everything is a nail. If you don’t understand the boundaries of each paradigm, it means that you still can’t live a good life after knowing so many principles. The reason is right, but we are wrong. We think that the truth is one. Chaos talks about monism. In fact, deep down I still believe in pluralism . Is the "one" behind

really the correct only "one"? I am skeptical, but in specific scenarios, learning from one example to another can help us solve problems faster and better. This is unquestionable, and we need to improve this ability.

news Category Latest News