01
There is something like this recently that makes people feel quite puzzled. I can't vomit coconuts.
The thing is like this: There is a hot post on Xiao’s book, which caused overwhelming discussion.
, the author of Douban's 9.4-distracted work " Living ", was also "lightning avoided".
Poster said that he was almost angry to death after reading " Brothers " written by Yu Hua because the plot was too abusive.
"What a perfect man", "dream girl", "weak angel", "lightning protection"...
, which is generally only used to describe Jinjiang online literature, is a bit out of the way with Yu Hua's serious literature. In the comment section of
, someone suggested that Yu Hua mark the lightning point in the future, such as: "Living" is not a double place, 1v1 in the later period, be careful when you have a knife.
Some people find it unreasonable: "Yu Hua has thought about 10,086 points of being criticized, but he has never thought about this angle."
Some people can't help but whine: "Save literature!!!"
In this era, more and more people often exclaim after reading some classic works: Destroy the three views! Lightning protection!
interprets characters one-sidedly and superficially, labels the works as simple, black or white, and then criticizes the author from the moral high ground.
For example, "The Moon and Sixpence", isn't it just a story of a scumbag who abandons his wife and children and even takes away his love? It's just a big thunder!
For example, Du Fu is not a vivid "ancient public intellectual". The things written "have no artistic conception, basically complaining", and are not good things, and later generations praised them too highly.
For example, "Jane Eyre", isn't it just a female protagonist's counterattack + a wife-chasing her uncle's story in the crematorium? The heroine is a little bit romantic and avoids lightning.
I read a post before, summarizing famous works in the form of online articles, which made me laugh.
"I became the master of the three thousand disciples admiring", guess what book it is? It is "The Analects of Confucius".
"There will always be a villain who wants to steal my master" is "Journey to the West".
"After the Sick Beauty was taken back to the Wealthy Family", it is " Dream of Red Mansions ".
"After the third marriage, I fell in love with my mortal enemy", it is "Gone with Gone".
"After White Moonlight got married, I became a billionaire" is "The Great Gatsby".
"I sent him a suicide note after running away from the ball", it is "Letter from a strange woman".
"Japan Neptune, Marrying a Substitute for Xiaoma" is " The Story of Genji "...
It seems that all classic works can be interpreted in the form of online writing, and are labeled as bloody and eye-catching, but they have eliminated the profound meaning of the original work.
02
There is also a group of "three-view parties" who like to transform into moral judges and judge characters in literary and artistic works.
They only like to read "Shuangjie (both men and women are pure from feelings to bodies), 1v1, HE, sweet pets", and use this set of logic of online literature to examine serious literature.
For example, when watching "Dream of Red Mansions", the quarrel in the barrage was quarreled. The passionate Jia Baoyu was criticized as a "central air conditioner" and a "scumbag";
, and his dislike of official career and fame and fortune was also nitpicked to be "not motivated, don't know if you have to pursue economic independence to protect girls?"
sentimental, arrogant and fragile Lin Daiyu was scolded for "science" for dozens of episodes;
steady, dignified, gentle and sensible Xue Baochai has become "green tea" and "scheming Girl".
The heroic epic movie "Titanic" not only contains love that follows life and death, but also the soul redemption by chance, as well as the despicable and noble human nature in the face of disaster.
In the eyes of the "Three Views Party", this becomes a simple "affective" story.
only has the bloody plot of "I gave my fiancee 100,000 yuan gift, but she did such a miserable thing with other men."
Watch "Madame Bovary ", they only saw "a vain white noble lady who gave X a thousand miles away".
, but the reason is that the background of the times was the period when capitalism flourished, and the heroine could not accept the cruel gap between reality and fantasy.
Watch "Thunderstorm", they only saw "destroying the three views" and "teaching bad children", but they could not see that this was a tragedy of an era, reflecting a microcosm of society at that time.
, the group of "three views" seem to feel that their three views are very positive. They always like to stand from their own perspective, label the characters in serious literature, criticize "destroying the three views", and believe that they should be banned.
But the world is really not black or white, nor flat, and there has never been a so-called absolutely "correct" view.
Just like Hugo said something very reasonable: "Erity is next to beauty, deformity is close to beauty, ugly monsters are hidden behind the sublime, evil and good coexist, darkness and light share. "
Those long-standing literary works can generally show magnificent epic scrolls, or profound and complex human nature.
Don’t always use the logic of reading sweet pampered online articles to read serious literature, fantasizing about giving the ancients ideological and moral lessons, okay?
03
In this algorithm era, many people actually fell into the " information cocoon " effect without knowing it.
Wang Xiaobo wrote such a story.
There is a country called " Khwarezm ". The king gave the following rule:
Any messenger who brings him good news will be promoted;
Any messenger who brings him bad news will be sent to feed the tiger.
The king naively thought that rewarding people who bring good news can encourage the arrival of good news;
punishing people who bring bad news can eliminate bad news.
Over time, in order not to save lives, the messengers made up all kinds of good news, so that the king could only hear the good news.
The "information cocoon" effect proposed by Harvard University professor is similar to this story:
"If a person only focuses on the field he chooses, or only focuses on things that make him happy and comfortable.
Over time, he will be like a silkworm, shackle himself in the self-woven cocoon, thus losing the ability to look at things in full. "
Those who are used to reading "double clean, HE" online literature and feel that classic literature is "destroying the three views" everywhere and needing to "avoid lightning" are actually trapped in the information cocoon.
is always immersed in the small world in one's eyes and refuses to come out, which will only lead to a person being more closed, self-conscious, ignorant, paranoid, and arrogant.
Just like Cai Kangyong said: "If you only read books that suit your taste, then you will always only know what you already know.
If you want to get something you have never gotten, then you have to do something you have never done."
Reading is actually a process of opening your horizons and eliminating narrowness and prejudice, rather than a process of painting books as a prison and trapping yourself.
Don’t be busy criticizing the three views of the characters in serious literature, and be busy warning other readers to "avoid lightning". This world is much more complicated than you think.
04
1 suggestions are, if possible, first read classic literature, and then read those popular online articles, which will make your reading threshold higher and the process smoother.
Blogger "Your Majesty the Ice Snake" once mentioned a sequelae that will lead to failure to develop the reading habit.
She said that she first read "Dream of Red Mansions", "Les Miserables", "Anna Karenina", and "Three Words and Two Shoots".
If you get used to these things and read online articles, the biggest problem may be that you have a high level of appreciation and can't stand those wrong sentences and procrastination writing methods, so you are more picky about online articles.
But if you do not touch classics, you should first come into contact with online books. If you are used to reading , jailf-watching , then read "Dream of Red Mansions", most of them cannot be read.
I am used to reading Long Aotian, and when I watch "Anna Karenina" again, I can't see anything except cuckold.
Why should we read more classics and first?
The so-called classic is a book that is still valuable to the present and future after being screened and eliminated by time.
A classic work often contains something close to the essence of things, which will give you different inspiration every time you read it.
Studying classics can help you get rid of the mediocrity and unfreedom of your mind and save you from the vulgar daily life.
When you read wildly and grow hard in various fields, and when your knowledge density becomes higher and higher and your vision becomes wider, you will see a different world and broader.
encouraged together.
Author: Xiaoyazi, a writer in the field of personal growth, the entire article read more than 100 million , accompany you to upgrade your cognition every day.
