Last Saturday to Sunday, Lao Liu participated in an interview with a provincial public institution, combined with his own experience and experience A few suggestions from the candidates of the unit for your reference [I am not like other headline authors, pretending to be profound and long-winded. I just point out the common problems. I hope the candidates will change if there are ones, and add if they don’t. Reluctant]:
1. Personal external image
Be generous in your clothes, and don’t dress too casually. Frequently Asked Questions:
(1) There are many candidates. As soon as you enter the examiner, you will find that the shirts that have just been opened, the new clothes have not been smoothed, and the clothes look very restrained, making you look more like a person. cautious. (It's not against you to wear new clothes and iron them without trouble). Also, it’s obviously a big belly, wearing a thin bodysuit and pants, it’s obviously a little skinny, and it’s not appropriate to dress like a bulging one.
(2) In summer, girls should not dress too thoroughly, such as wearing a white shirt, translucent like tulle, with a black bra inside, which is too garish and does not affect it.
(3) Why do you have to wear a pair of leather shoes, with a shirt and trousers on your upper body, and a pair of sports shoes underneath. How do you look like a civil servant who has already been employed!
(4) Never wear clothes with obvious signs,Suspected of cheating on exams.
2. Personal language and conversation
Speak loudly, cleanly, not sluggishly, speak stubbornly, and make you feel unconfident and unconfident.
(1) Thousands of thousands put an end to the chariots. If you haven’t considered it clearly, spend more time thinking and answering. Don’t think while talking. Trust me, in that high-pressure environment. No matter how good your brain is, it’s not as good as “bad writing”. First, write down what you want to say and draft it on paper. This is a foolproof magic weapon.
(2) The voice must be loud and loud, but there must be no “screaming”. The words were spoken, not shouted. Some candidates, in order to appear loud and loud, even changed their tone of voice, and responded with the confidence of "arguing", making the examiner shudder. There must be a degree of control, a loud voice, that is, don't leave the words in your throat, you must speak out openly, but not by shouting.
(3) To speak Mandarin, this is the most basic thing.
(4) When speaking, don't turn your eyes around or look around. Always take the chief examiner as the center. Other examiners can easily and consciously or unconsciously exchange a glance at the appropriate time, but don't look around the examiner's face like a rattle.
3. The logical aspects of answering questions
must be clear and organized.Don’t be afraid of dullness, be good at using 1, 2, 3, and 4 to list, good at using since, but, on the one hand, on the other hand, need, need, and need, first, second, and again, let the examiner listen to your answer clearly The logic is much stronger than cooking a pot of porridge.
(1) Don't make mistakes of viewpoints and principles. We advocate a dialectical approach to problems, but principles and bottom lines cannot be broken. To make an extreme analogy, Zhang San wants to make money to treat his old father and sell national intelligence to foreign spies. How do you view Zhang San's approach? Don't look at the problem dialectically here, saying that Zhang San's approach has both advantages and disadvantages. Principle issues and the bottom line cannot be broken.
(2) Don't be far-fetched. For example, how do you view the issue of eating and broadcasting on the Internet, you can analyze the phenomenon first, and put forward your own views and opinions, but when you put forward your opinions, you must extend it to a certain degree. For eating and broadcasting, it can be extended to hard work and food conservation. , Core values, network supervision, etc., but if this extends to the global food crisis, it will be a little far away.
(3) Unfamiliar and unintelligible idioms, words, current political hotspots, and specific expressions. Do not use them lightly. If they are used up, they will be like a mouse shit and a pot of porridge.
(4) Examination of questions must be accurate and comprehensive. If you are asked to answer the advantages and disadvantages of something, don't just answer the advantages and forget the disadvantages. Let you answer whether it is white or black, and you should not answer whether it is metal or plastic.
4. Technical level
(1) The relationship between thinking time and answering time must be handled correctly, a total of 10 minutes, if you take 8 minutes to think, it is definitely not appropriate . In this regard, there are differences between people, but there is a basic point to refer to,It means that the thinking time and the answering time are 50-50%. On this basis, you can make overall arrangements according to the speed of your personal mind and the speed of your mouth.
(2) Be sure to listen carefully to the guiding words and prompt words of the chief examiner. Don't think that it's all stylized things, all nonsense, and it's easy to get a big loss if you can't hear it clearly.
5. What kind of pre-exam materials should be prepared
I will just say one thing here. Betting is very difficult. If you want to bet, take the commentator article, half-month talk, and seek truth from the People’s Daily for nearly half a year. Look at the magazine and master some basic concepts. Then, take out the real questions over the years and practice them. The real question changes year by year, but the connotation and routines will not change. If you want to stay in the same line, then you don't need to bet on the treasure. What you answer is the treasure.
Okay, just go ahead and talk about these, if you find it useful, welcome to forward, bookmark, and like. Codewords are not easy, and originality is not easy. If you think it will help you a little bit, please pay attention to it and leave a message. I will be honored.
.
