According to Observer.com , the US, Japan and the Philippines recently held a "High-level Meeting of the US, Japan and the Philippines Army" for defense cooperation at the Asahigakuen station in Japan, and reached a consensus on strengthening military cooperation between the three countries and agreed to hold the same meeting every year. After the meeting, the Minister of the Three Kingdoms Military Minister summarized the meeting.
Japanese Self-Defense Force Ground Chief of Staff Keihide Yoshida said that the three countries do not allow any party to unilaterally change the status quo with their strength, and resolutely safeguard the international order based on the rule of law.
U.S. Pacific Army Commander Flynn claimed that the three countries showed unity with each other through this historic meeting, but considering the current security environment, the training and preparation of multilateral between the three countries is very important.
Flynn
Philippine Army Commander Brauna sang a counter-tongue in front of the representatives of the United States and Japan, saying that he would respond to the current challenges and problems. The three countries will further strengthen cooperation, but the meeting is not targeted at specific countries.
is obvious. Although Keihi Yoshida did not specify it, the object he called "not unilaterally changing the status quo" is likely to be China, because on the one hand, Japan regards China as a long-term "security threat", and on the other hand, it has hyped similar topics with other countries many times before and asked China to "do not change the status quo of the Taiwan Strait."
And based on the actual situation, on the issue of the Taiwan Strait, Japan has also made extremely provocative remarks such as "If there is something wrong with the Taiwan Strait, Japan will have something wrong", which greatly increases the possibility of Yoshida Keihide attacking China.
Hagida Hikari
Not only that, Japan recently sent the president of government investigation Hagida Hikari to visit Taiwan, China. Its openly claimed at the so-called "Taiwan-Japan Exchange Forum" that Taiwan is an important "partner" of Japan. In order to deal with the "threat" of China and North Korea, Japan urgently needs to increase military expenditures and immediately develop its own defense capabilities. It must think twice to deter the "invaders".
Hagida Koichi not only ignored China's warning to intervene in Taiwan, but also reiterated the argument that "if there is something wrong with the Taiwan Strait, Japan is something wrong" and attempted to increase his own military strength, which further confirms that Keihi Yoshida's words are targeting China.
As for Flynn's remarks, they simply express two meanings: There are risks in the security of in the Asia-Pacific region, and the security work in the region is not ideal, and the United States needs to strengthen its existence in the Asia-Pacific region.
U.S. Navy warship
It is obvious from Flynn's point of view that he has regarded the Asia-Pacific region as his own property, so he is confident that he wants to increase his military presence in the region to deal with what he believes is "security risk" - China.
However, in fact, the United States is just a member of the eastern part of the Asia-Pacific region and is not qualified to interfere in the affairs of the Western Pacific, especially in provoking disputes under the name of maintaining regional security and stability. This greatly undermines the peace and stability of the entire Asia-Pacific region, so the United States is a security threat to the Asia-Pacific region.
Compared with the remarks of the United States and Japan, Brauna's remarks are obviously very friendly, especially not targeting specific countries. After all, we must know that the purpose of the United States, Japan and Latin America and the Philippines to discuss matters related to strengthening military cooperation is to try to unite them to deal with the so-called "China threat."
The United States advocates the "China threat theory"
In order to achieve this goal, both the United States and Japan have taken a series of preparatory measures. For example, the United States plans to set up a new military base in the Philippines, and Japan has also symbolically dispatched two fighter jets to the Philippines recently.
However, Brauner's remarks "not targeting specific countries" clearly do not want to support the actions of the United States and Japan against China, but the compromise plan made by the pressure of the United States is because the Philippines is currently maintaining a neutral position and does not want to "select side positions" between China and the United States. Therefore, even if it cannot refuse the US's win over, it must show that it has no targeting China.
And it is worth mentioning that shortly after serving as the Philippine President in Marcos , military cooperation was reached between China and the Philippines. With the changes in the international situation and the political legacy left by Duterte , China is of great significance to the Philippines at present.
Macos
You should know that in the current situation where the economies of all countries are in serious crisis, cooperating with China is obviously a good way to stabilize its own economy. Especially when there is already a suspension of cooperation between China and the Philippines, the Philippines will inevitably seek to resume cooperation.
Moreover, as a country that maintains a neutral position and has long seen the true face of the United States, the Philippines cannot see the intention of Latin America to jump into the fire pit in the confrontation. This is why the Philippines will clearly refuse to target a certain country in order to avoid becoming a victim of the United States' provocation of China.
In short, the US and Japan’s attempts are nothing more than a relationship with suppressing China. But what the US and Japan need to know is that not all countries cannot see the true face of provoking trouble. If the United States still insists on creating risks in the Asia-Pacific region, it will inevitably be jointly opposed by countries in the region that truly seek to maintain peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, and the United States’ own plan to control the Asia-Pacific region will also be completely lost.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-