In a country with a strong army, other branches of the service are not much weaker. But there are exceptions to this. What many people don’t understand the most is why the Indian Army is not good at combat effectiveness?

The Army is the basic military strength of a country, so the Army is also the foundation of a country's strength.

The army is powerful, and other branches of the other services are not much weaker.

But countries that do not have the army can basically not work, and the ultimate result is the weakness of national strength.

So the rise of our country actually started with the army, which has the current powerful navy and air force.

But there are exceptions to this. What many people don’t understand the most is why Indian Army is not effective in combat? You may not have imagined it.

After India was founded, it actually inherited the army foundation of the British Empire .

Moreover, the Indian Army is huge in scale, with 1.3 million regular troops. With the reserve service, the entire army is more than 2 million, with a huge scale.

, and long-term purchase of advanced tanks , advanced tanks from Russia, Germany, and the West, armored vehicles, guns and ammunition, missiles , etc.

It can be said that just on the surface, it is very powerful.

After the actual war, we can actually see that the Indian Army has very weak combat effectiveness.

not only does civil war, but foreign war is even more so.

The Indian Army alone cannot beat Pakistan .

The Indian Army fought against the surrounding neighboring countries, and basically all failed.

Even the army of Nepal could not defeat it, and in 1962, he fought against our army.

was even more miserable, extremely miserable, and almost no strength could be seen.

So I am deeply impressed worldwide, that is the Indian navy, the air force is fine, the army is very weak.

Many people don’t understand why the Indian Army is not good at combat effectiveness?

actually has two main reasons, the most fundamental reason is the problem of military composition.

We know that in order for the army to have combat effectiveness, we must be united, united, and have the heart of dying.

In the end, morale is high and the more you fight, the more courageous you become.

This is true for our country's army, but the Indian army and officers are all high caste groups.

Soldiers are all untouchables, and officers look down on soldiers, and soldiers hate officers.

So in the war, they basically have their own ulterior motives, and it's okay if they win. Once

fails, it will scatter. No one will spare his life. How can this be effective!

The second is a training problem, the army requires long-term training.

But the Indian Army is all fat, from this we can see that its training is very poor and its physical fitness is poor.

Therefore, it is difficult to run long distances and have the will to fight.

This is also the main reason. Therefore, it is difficult to improve the combat effectiveness of the Indian Army and it is too weak.

What do you think of this? Welcome to leave a message, welcome to consult, and discuss with the editor.

Welcome to follow [Revealing the Truth of History], and update you with fresh historical information every day and see everything in the world without going out!

References: "Modern and Contemporary History of the World".