After the meeting between the Chinese and US heads of state, the tensions between China and the United States caused by the Taiwan issue have been phased. Although it seems that the Sino-US relations have not deteriorated for the time being, the US military's attitude towards China is becoming increasingly provocative. There is no doubt that the US military has not changed its containment policy towards China, which makes people worry that Sino-US relations will still face great uncertainty in the future.
First thing: US Secretary of Defense Austin speaks out that the United States does not allow China's values to formulate guidelines for the 21st century!
December 5, according to domestic media citing Voice of America, US Secretary of Defense Austin said on Saturday at the Reagan Defense Forum that the United States is at a critical moment of "confrontation" China, and the United States needs military force to ensure that the global norms for the 21st century are formulated by the values of the United States, not Beijing.
Austin claims that “in our imperfect world, deterrence does come from strength.” The next few years will determine our competitive conditions with the People’s Republic of China. These conditions will shape the future of security in Europe. ” These conditions will determine whether our descendants inherit an open world with rules and rights.
Austin pointed out that China is the only country with both the will and increasingly capable of reshaping the regional and international order to meet its preferences. Therefore, I want to make it clear: we will not let this happen.
It is obvious that the speech of the US Secretary of Defense Austin on China is very direct, that is, the United States does not accept the emergence of a global landscape dominated by China.
And Austin also made no secret of the fact that military forces will be the most important deterrent force for the United States to achieve its goals, and the country targeted by this deterrent force is China.
Austin also showed that the United States also showed that military forces will be the most important deterrent force for the United States to achieve its goals, and the country targeted by this deterrent force is China.
Austin also showed the United States The bottom line of the country is that the United States cannot give up global dominance, nor will it allow such countries to appear.
For Austin's speech, it is obvious that it is a freshener for us, which means that the United States' containment of China and suppression policy will basically not change. The calmness now is more like accumulating potential energy for a more intense game.
Of course, we have no illusions about the United States. The United States adopts the containment policy for China . It is impossible for us to persuade the United States to change its position through words. The only way we can work is to prove to the United States that we have enough strength and that the United States' containment policy will inevitably fail.
This also fully reminds us that the game between countries, strength is the basis, and strength has the right to speak. There is no falsehood, and the only principle that the United States believes in is the principle of strength.
There is nothing to be afraid of Austin's words. There has never been a smooth and smooth road to the rise of a great power, but China will move forward, and the Chinese people will move forward.
The second thing: The Canadian Foreign Minister made a provocation, claiming that he will send more warships through Taiwan Strait !
December 5, according to the Russian Satellite News Agency,! On December 5, according to the Russian Satellite News Agency, Canadian Foreign Minister Jolie declared in an interview with the British " Financial Times " that Canada plans to send more warships through the Taiwan Sea The strait needs to ensure that the Taiwan Strait remains the status of the "international strait".
Qiaoli said without any concealment that Canada will play a greater defensive role in the Indo-Pacific region. We need to ensure that the problem of the "Taiwan Strait" is clear, and it is still a " International strait ". On the Taiwan Strait issue, we will continue to implement an order based on international rules.
Qiaoli explained that this is why a Canadian frigate crosses the Taiwan Strait with the US military this summer, and we hope that more frigates will pass through the strait.
Whether it is the Taiwan issue or foreign warships passing through the Taiwan Strait, this is undoubtedly a very sensitive issue. The Canadian Foreign Minister openly stated that he would send more warships through the Taiwan Strait, which is obviously trying to cause trouble.
Objectively speaking, there is actually no fundamental contradiction between China and Canada, but Canada is making a fuss about the Taiwan issue, which actually only shows one thing, that is, Canada's diplomatic strategy looks more like a vassal of the United States.
Previously, we have publicly stated that the Taiwan Strait is not an international waters. We have full jurisdiction over the Taiwan Strait. Any foreign ship passing through the Taiwan Strait must comply with China's management regulations, that is, report in advance, and is harmlessly passed through .
Although the Canadian Foreign Minister pleads provocatively, we have to see what specific measures Canada will take in the future. If Canada passes through the Taiwan Strait in a provocative way, I am afraid that our bomber , warships, and roadbed anti-ship missile are not vegetarians either.
To be honest, we still hope that Canada will not make such a provocative move. Mainland China already has enough military means to deal with all provocations. There is no need for Canada to deteriorate China-Canada relations on the one hand, and to insult itself on the other hand.
Today is different from the past. The era when one or two foreign ships want to shock the Chinese people is over, and it is a permanent past.
The third thing: The French president is criticized, and the voice of rationality in Europe is declining!
December 5, according to domestic media reports, on December 4 local time, French President Macron hinted that in the future negotiations to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, "Russia needs to be secured" and believes that this is part of the European peace process.
Unexpectedly, as soon as Macron said this, he was strongly criticized by the Baltic countries. Latvia Deputy Prime Minister Attis Pabricks said: "The idea that the idea that the West can end the Russian-Ukraine conflict by providing security to Russia to the West is falling into the trap of the narrative of Putin , that is, the West and Ukraine are responsible for the conflict, and Russia is the innocent victim."
Lithuania Former Foreign Minister Linas Linkvicus claimed on Twitter: "If Russia does not attack, annex or occupy neighboring countries, it has all security guarantees. If anyone wants to create a new security architecture that allows terrorist countries to continue their intimidation methods, they should think twice."
wants to say that Macron's speech is also for peace and stability in Europe. Moreover, Europe has suffered the most serious damage since the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. As a neighbor that cannot be moved away, can Europe completely exclude Russia?
If Europe excludes Russia, then the hostility between Europe and Russia will continue. When the hostility accumulates, it is very likely to cause new conflicts. If Europe wants to exclude Russia and obtain security, this is essentially a mine-burning for future conflicts.
Macron's speech is a rational and pragmatic voice after understanding the overall situation. But now the Baltic countries stand up to oppose it. Obviously, the Baltic does not want to normalize relations with Russia.
As the saying goes, enemies should be resolved rather than formed. On the European land, Britain and France were once a feudal feud, and Germany and France were once a feudal feud. Aren’t these feudal countries now in peace and can cooperate in all aspects?
Europe and Russia do have historical hatred, but now new hatred has been added. But, there should be an end to this. If Europe cannot properly handle its relations with Russia, future turmoil in Europe will be inevitable.
Macron was criticized, in fact, which means that the road to reconciliation between Russia and Europe is very long, and the voice of rationality in Europe is already very weak.
(End of this article)
Statement: The picture is from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it!
