As the conflict between Russia and Ukraine enters its fifth month, the situation has obviously entered the next stage, that is, NATO is planning to move from behind the scenes to the front. The reason for this change is because the Ukrainian army can no longer hold on. Went down. Since the outbreak of the conflict, the Ukrainian army has been losing positions, from Mariupol to Severodonetsk, and next will be Lisichansk, and even Kiev will not be protected. The Ukrainian army's combat effectiveness is obviously not as good as that of the Russian army, but it has tried its best and paid a heavy price with the death of a large number of soldiers. Now most of its ranks are only new recruits.
The proxy battle led by NATO can only be described as a disastrous defeat, but it not only failed on the battlefield, but also lost miserably outside the battlefield. The original intention was to crush the Russian economy through blockade and suppression, but instead the Russian side became richer and richer as it fought, earning more than 600 billion yuan in energy revenue within 100 days. Looking back at NATO countries, rising prices, energy shortages, inflation are becoming increasingly serious, and they have suffered severe backlash. Under such circumstances, NATO should stop losses in time, but it is still unwilling to do so. Just recently, NATO announced that it would increase the number of rapid reaction force to 300,000, a direct increase of 7 times.
Previously, NATO's quick reaction force only had 40,000 people, but now it has increased its number to 300,000. The purpose of such a large-scale expansion of troops has been very obvious. In addition to the expansion of the quick reaction force, a new round of "army expansion" has also begun within NATO. Prepare for war." First, the United States increased its military expenditure to 857.6 billion U.S. dollars, and then Germany also passed a military expansion plan worth 100 billion euros. The United Kingdom also proposed a plan to create an elite force specifically targeted at Russia. It is not difficult to see that NATO countries have put their military expansion plans on the agenda, and the Russian military's performance in the conflict has indeed made them nervous.
This time it may be Russia's turn to be under pressure. In this conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has single-handedly dealt with the siege of the entire NATO. If the Ukrainian army had not been too stretched, the Russian army might not have been able to advance so smoothly. But the Russian army may face greater pressure next, that is, NATO countries are likely to directly send troops to participate, and the situation will be very different by then. Regardless of their familiarity with equipment or combat effectiveness, the NATO army is superior to the Ukrainian army, especially the US military, which is the biggest enemy facing the Russian army. Once countries choose to take action against Russia, Russia is likely to fall into a situation of fighting alone.
In order to protect its own interests, Russia must also expand its military strength. This will lead to an arms race and a greater crisis. And NATO has once again used actual actions to prove that it is an evil organization. Apart from provoking conflicts and contradictions around the world, it has made no contribution to world peace. But today's situation is obviously different from the past. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which NATO has not directly intervened in, makes it so uncomfortable, let alone fighting directly with Russia? I advise all countries not to think too highly of themselves, especially the United States.
(Text/Xile)
