According to the Russian Satellite News Agency, the United States recently released a new version of the national security strategy document, which claimed that The United States will be committed to reducing the risk of nuclear war in and will upgrade the nuclear strike against forces to maintain the United States' nuclear deterrence capabilities.
According to reports, the document stated straight to the point that by 2030, the United States needs to deter two nuclear powers at the same time, both of which have modern nuclear power. To ensure a strong response to the threats faced, the United States will upgrade its Trinity nuclear strike capabilities and its nuclear infrastructure.
The world's number one military power openly declares that it will upgrade and transform its nuclear power, which undoubtedly adds more unstable factors to this already turbulent world. However, the United States still wants to seize the moral high ground and claim that it is to reduce the risk of nuclear war.
US national security strategy document claims that the United States does not seek conflict or a new Cold War and does not want competition among countries to intensify the degree of world division. The document emphasizes that the United States has always supported the free choice of countries, which is in the interests of everyone.
Simply put, this long and rumored document mainly expresses two contradictory views. First, the United States hopes to strengthen its nuclear advantages over other countries. Second, the United States hopes to make countries believe that they are completely out of kindness through wonderful words.
It can be said that this document fully reflects the hypocritical face of the United States. However, no matter from any perspective, the strategic intentions of the United States revealed in the document are difficult to achieve. Because the comprehensive strength of the United States today, the appeal of ideology , and the current international community reality can no longer support the ambitions of the United States.
First of all, the United States attempted to suppress two nuclear powers at once, and this goal was completely beyond the scope that the United States could bear. Even during the Cold War when the United States was still strong, the United States did not take action against all its opponents at the same time. The United States chose to unite with its secondary opponents at that time to suppress its main opponents. Through this strategy, the United States won the Cold War and reached the top of the world.
Over the years, former US Presidents Obama and Trump have wanted to copy past successes. As a result, these two people have disclosed their strategic intentions to the outside world, but they were labeled as "Russia" by American public opinion and eventually had to choose to give up.
After Biden came to power, he also realized that American independent is difficult to support and must find a strong helper. In June 2021, at the "Public Visit" held at Switzerland , Biden attempted to persuade Putin to suppress the development of Asia, but ended up feeling disappointed. Biden's failure made the United States give up its fight for Russia. The outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in February 2022 completely lost the possibility of cooperation between the United States and Russia.
Secondly, the ideology of the United States has declined and can no longer call on the international community to implement its strategic concepts. This time, White House publicly released the national security strategy document, spending a lot of time explaining how its nuclear strategy is in the interests of everyone. The United States' move is nothing more than to make countries believe in sweet words and stand on the same side as the United States.
If it were in the past, this approach in the United States was quite effective. Once upon a time, an initiative by the White House in the United States could easily arouse response from many countries around the world. The instigation of the US media can cause turmoil from , North Africa, and then to the Middle East.
It’s a pity that in the past two years, in order to maintain its hegemony, the United States has increasingly explicitly destroyed the international order, allowing everyone to see the true face of " American Democracy ". Now, the United States has made various wonderful rhetorics again, which is difficult for other countries to impress.
Finally, hegemonic thinking can no longer cope with the current international situation. Although the United States has always stated that it will not seek conflict or a new Cold War, the United States' operating ideas still follow the past model.
The United States has not changed, but the world has changed a lot. The situation of the international community's "one super dominance" has been completely broken, and the world is entering a period of increasingly diversified development.Even the once-immortal Western world has become increasingly loose, causing the United States to lose many powerful helpers.
Nowadays, the United States is still trying to control the international order with absolute strength, which is difficult to achieve again. In essence, the new version of the national security strategy document released by the United States this time is completely a product of the last century and is incompatible with the international atmosphere of this era.
This reflects that there are still many old antiques and interest groups in the United States that hold old ideas, and this force must still have a strong influence in the American politics, so this document can be pushed to the international community.
However, as the old forces in this world struggle desperately, a new world will also rise. Although it has suffered various unexpected impacts, the performance of , the developing country of , represented by Asian countries, this year is still far better than that of Western countries.
As the international influence of developing countries gradually increases, the international order will become more fair. Then, the phenomenon of "starting from strength and status" in the past issuing orders to other countries will definitely disappear completely.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-