According to foreign media reports, Iran recently arrested 19 Europeans involved in the riots . These people came from Germany, France, Italy, and Poland and other countries. According to the Iranian Intelligence Department, these people were arrested by "during the riots, behind the scenes," . The news of
has once again added fire to the already deadlocked relationship between Iran and the West. In fact, the origin of this round of tensions between Iran and the United States can be traced back to the progress of negotiations on nuclear agreements between the United States and Iran before the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
Simply put, after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, in order to alleviate the global energy crisis, the United States began to contact Iran again on the Iran nuclear agreement negotiations under the strong promotion of EU . At the beginning, the negotiations between the two sides made relatively large progress.
EU representative once said that more than 95% of the negotiations on Iran nuclear issue have been completed. During that time, the Western network was filled with the supply gap left by European and American sanctions on Russian oil once the negotiations of the Iran nuclear agreement are completed and the United States will liberate sanctions and embargo on Iranian oil, which can fill the supply gap left by European and American sanctions on Russian oil and stabilize oil prices.
But then, no one expected that the remaining 5% differences were never agreed upon by the United States and Iran. In fact, it was mainly because the United States insisted on putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on the list of foreign terrorist organizations. The two sides had a great disagreement on this matter and could not reach an agreement at all. The deeper logic of this matter is actually the competition between the United States and Iran for the influence of Middle East . The United States has listed Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a list of foreign terrorist organizations, in fact, in order to facilitate the fight against Iran-backed armed forces in the Middle East , protect its interests in oil-producing countries, and prevent Iran's influence from expanding to the entire Middle East.
No matter what, there is no negotiation between Iran and the United States on this issue, so the so-called relaxation of oil sanctions on Iran and the replacement of Russia's market share is actually ruined. Then Russian President Putin seized the opportunity and quickly signed a US$40 billion oil cooperation development agreement with Iran.
On one side is the US’s blank check, on the one hand is the visible benefits given by Russia, on the other hand is the US’s attitude of giving alms, on the other hand, Russia regards Iran as a friend, and how to choose is clear at a glance.
Iran completely turned to Russia, which naturally aroused the United States' anger and anger. Therefore, using some social incidents in Iran, it is not surprising that the United States and the West incited public opinion in Iran and launched a "color revolution" openly. After all, this is always the "special skill" of the United States and the United States.
U.S. Secretary of State Blinken even publicly supports the Iranian masses who created riots, saying, "The Iranian people will not be isolated and helpless, and are in the dark. The United States will provide help to the Iranian people and let the Iranian people better confront the Iranian government's surveillance and censorship practices."
In the past two years, due to China's international appeal, more and more countries have begun to oppose the United States' planning of the "color revolution" and the United States' interference in the internal affairs of other countries. In order to alleviate public pressure, this White House administration has even made public statements many times, claiming that the United States does not seek to subvert the regimes of other countries through the means of "color revolution".
Although everyone knows that this is a false promise, at least on the surface, the United States is not very brave to publicly support the "color revolution" of other countries. This time there was a riot in Iran, Blinken, as the US Secretary of State, publicly stood up to support .
This is obviously aimed at some actions that have been closely collaborated between Iran and Russia in recent times, giving Iran a little "color". Iran is also a regional power, and for so long, I am not afraid of the United States at all, so takes both sides .
directly used missile and drones to attack in Iraq . Of course, it was nominally carried out for the purpose of "counter-terrorism". directly arrested 9 Europeans involved in the riots in China , which was obviously a counterattack against Europe and the United States.
This is easy to understand when fighting against Kurdish armed forces, because Kurdish armed forces are supported by the United States. But it was clearly the United States planning a "color revolution" behind the scenes, why did Iran arrest nine Europeans?
There is a little mystery here. On the one hand, it is the integration of European and American culture. These Europeans may have really participated in some recent protests in Iran and deliberately created riots. On the other hand, it is also because due to the long-term deterioration of US-Iran relations, in fact, the communication channels between Iran and the United States are blocked.
Whether it is the EU leading the way during the negotiations on the Iran nuclear agreement, or the arrest of nine Europeans now, is actually one purpose, that is, to express its position to the United States through the EU, and at the same time put pressure on the EU to let the EU influence the United States.
is different from the United States. In terms of energy, the EU wants to strengthen cooperation with Iran and seek others, so naturally the attitude will be better. Similarly, no matter what the United States really thinks, it has to make some concessions appropriately when facing the EU, the most important ally. Otherwise, the United States will support the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, but put the EU on fire, completely disregarding the EU's interests and insisting on turning against Iran again. Wouldn't it force the EU to rebel?
From this perspective, Iran's strategic direction is at least correct, but it is actually hard to say whether this strategy can work. Because the United States has always ignored the life and death of the EU, and even now undermines Russia-EU relations, and even the relations between the EU and Iran, it is done on purpose, with the purpose of continuing to hold the EU hostage in order to export a large amount of oil to the EU.
If the relationship with Iran is really alleviated, leading to an increase in Iran's energy exports and solving the EU's problems, how can the United States export energy to the EU at high prices? Therefore, although Iran's move has been pondered for several years, from the reality, it may be difficult to achieve the desired results.
